Legal expert Michael Conway on Sunday criticized the Supreme Court’s decision to consider former President Donald Trump‘s immunity claim.
“Unfortunately, I believe this is the wrong question. And the way it is worded runs the risk of delivering the wrong answer,” Conway said.
Conway, in his opinion piece published on Wednesday, pointed out that the court’s question focuses on the extent of a former president’s immunity from criminal prosecution for alleged official acts during their tenure. He argued that this question is overly broad and could lead to a convoluted answer, potentially delaying Trump’s trial and impacting the government’s efforts to hold him accountable.
Conway’s concerns were echoed by Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe, who also criticized the court’s language as overly sweeping and abstract. The court’s decision to include the phrase “conduct alleged to involve official acts” could complicate the issue and potentially lead to a more nuanced answer, allowing for immunity in some circumstances but not in others.
“In that scenario, the court would return the appeal to a lower court to apply its ruling to the facts of the indictment against Trump. That delay would be the final, fatal blow to the government's effort in D.C. to hold Trump accountable in a jury trial before November's election.”
According to Real Clear Politics, at the national level, Trump held 78.7% support among GOP voters, While Haley trailed with 15.3% support.
Read Next: ‘Why Did Saudi Arabia Give Jared Kushner $2 Billion’: House Democrat Targets Donald Trump’s Daughter
This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors.
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
