Whales with a lot of money to spend have taken a noticeably bullish stance on Vistra.
Looking at options history for Vistra (NYSE:VST) we detected 18 trades.
If we consider the specifics of each trade, it is accurate to state that 44% of the investors opened trades with bullish expectations and 38% with bearish.
From the overall spotted trades, 4 are puts, for a total amount of $244,988 and 14, calls, for a total amount of $901,432.
Predicted Price Range
Based on the trading activity, it appears that the significant investors are aiming for a price territory stretching from $100.0 to $170.0 for Vistra over the recent three months.
Insights into Volume & Open Interest
Looking at the volume and open interest is a powerful move while trading options. This data can help you track the liquidity and interest for Vistra's options for a given strike price. Below, we can observe the evolution of the volume and open interest of calls and puts, respectively, for all of Vistra's whale trades within a strike price range from $100.0 to $170.0 in the last 30 days.
Vistra Call and Put Volume: 30-Day Overview
Significant Options Trades Detected:
About Vistra
Current Position of Vistra
- With a trading volume of 1,662,547, the price of VST is down by -0.44%, reaching $163.13.
- Current RSI values indicate that the stock is may be overbought.
- Next earnings report is scheduled for 71 days from now.
What The Experts Say On Vistra
3 market experts have recently issued ratings for this stock, with a consensus target price of $167.33.
Unusual Options Activity Detected: Smart Money on the Move
Options trading presents higher risks and potential rewards. Astute traders manage these risks by continually educating themselves, adapting their strategies, monitoring multiple indicators, and keeping a close eye on market movements. Stay informed about the latest Vistra options trades with real-time alerts from Benzinga Pro.
© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
To add Benzinga News as your preferred source on Google, click here.
