Lessons From The 2016 Election Market Response

By Jesy Beeson
Market participants use futures and options to manage risk around specific events, and volatility more broadly. In 2016, we saw a significant market reaction to the results of the U.S. presidential election, particularly in equity index markets. The surge in market activity on the election news came against the background of a prolonged period of low volatility in many markets.

In the lead-up to the 2020 election, the volatility environment seems to be quite different. The impact of the global pandemic, U.S. economic downturn and the prospects of low interest rates for the foreseeable future have roiled markets since February. Given these circumstances, the election could present a unique event risk to markets.

The results of the U.S. Presidential election in 2016 were delivered throughout the November 9 overnight trading session, and many market participants utilized E-mini S&P 500 futures contracts to manage their risk after the U.S. cash markets closed. As in 2016, the overnight trading capabilities and breadth of products across six asset classes on CME Group’s markets will be available to those seeking to manage their risks around the clock throughout the election. 

2016 U.S. Election

The results of the 2016 U.S. Presidential elections surprised many and defied most probability models, even as polls had tightened in the weeks leading up to the election on Nov. 8, 2016. Markets in general were caught on the back foot, leading to significant movements across equities and rates as results came in the evening of Nov. 8 and into the early morning hours of Nov. 9.

As markets responded to the news, equity futures saw dramatic moves that were largely reversed by the end of the U.S. trading day. This reflected how market participants were digesting the impact of the electoral news and adjusting their expectations of the new administration.

This dynamic response to the results highlights the flexibility and reliability of futures markets for participants seeking to hedge risk against a changing news cycle. E-mini S&P 500 futures saw record volumes and tight bid/ask spreads throughout the trading day, during both U.S. hours and around the clock. Markets reeled in response to the results of the 2016 presidential elections, with E-mini S&P 500 futures prices falling more than 6% before ending the day higher. Volumes were elevated throughout the day as traders worked to protect their exposure. 

The E-mini S&P 500 saw a big drop and quickly recovered following the 2016 Presidential election.

Volatility 2016 v. 2020

The election in 2016 occurred during a very different volatility environment than markets are currently facing. Implied volatility in the E-mini S&P 500 for the months leading up to Nov. 8, 2016 was fairly stable, between 10% – 15%. The same months in 2020 highlight recent changes in overall volatility dynamics, with implied volatility consistently above 20%, and as high as 25%, throughout September and into mid-October. 

Implied volatility is higher in 2020 than in 2016.

Micro Approach

The election in 2016 occurred during a very different volatility environment than markets are currently facing. Implied volatility in the E-mini S&P 500 for the months leading up to Nov. 8, 2016 was fairly stable, between 10% – 15%. The same months in 2020 highlight recent changes in overall volatility dynamics, with implied volatility consistently above 20%, and as high as 25%, throughout September and into mid-October. 

Micro E-mini volume has remained high in 2020.

Managing uncertainty has always been a core function of futures and options markets, and that’s never been truer than in 2020. When it comes to election results, however, we can look to history, volatility levels and available tools to understand the ways markets can respond to expected or unexpected results.

Jesy Beeson, Director of Business Intelligence, CME Group Jesy Beeson is a Director of Business Intelligence at CME Group.

To learn more about futures and options, go to Benzinga’s futures and options education resource.

Posted In: 2016 presidential election2020 presidential electionVolatilityGovernmentNewsFuturesPoliticsMarketsGeneral

Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on Bankrate.com. The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.

All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to improve the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the Bankrate.com rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.

Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.

Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.