Multifactor exchange traded funds are expected to be a future source of growth for the already fast-growing smart beta universe. Data suggest advisors and investors are likely to increase their use of multifactor ETFs in the years ahead. For now, many of the multifactor products on the market are still young, but lack of seasoning should not deter investors.
Next year could be significant for some multifactor ETFs when several members of this group will celebrate their three-year anniversaries — one of the milestones that's widely followed among fund investors.
“In 2018, seven differently constructed multifactor ETFs will hit their three-year anniversary, as asset managers begin offering a rules-based transparent approach that combines some of the attributes that historically provided active managers with outperformance,” CFRA Research Director of ETF & Mutual Fund Research Todd Rosenbluth said in a recent note. “These five attributes, or factors, were quality, momentum, value, low volatility and size.”
A Fine Start
TheGoldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity ETF GSLC turns three next September and is already solidifying itself as one of the dominant names among U.S. large-cap multifactor ETFs. Now home to $2.71 billion in assets under management, GSLC is easily one of the most successful ETFs that debuted in 2015.
GSCL follows the Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Large Cap Equity Index, which “seeks to capture common sources of active equity returns, including value (i.e., the security's price compared to market value), momentum (i.e., performance history), quality (i.e., profitability relative to total assets) and volatility (i.e., consistency of returns),” according to Goldman.
Part of the reason GSLC has lured investors is its low fee. The ETF's annual expense ratio “is 9 basis points, compared to the industry average for smart beta ETFs of 35 basis points."
The iShares Edge MSCI Multifactor USA ETF LRGF, which turns three in April 2018, is a rival to GSLC. Home to $766 million in assets under management, LRGF tracks the MSCI USA Diversified Multiple-Factor Index.
In 2017, the two best performers and biggest asset gatherers of this multifactor group were LRGF and GSLC,” said Rosenbluth. “Both LRGF and GSLC utilize four factors to build their ETFs, with three overlapping ones (quality, value and momentum). LRGF includes size as the fourth factor, while GSLC adds in a low volatility component as the fourth factor.”
LRGF holds 148 stocks and is pricier than GSLC with an annual fee of 0.2 percent. CFRA rates LRGF Marketweight and GSLC Overweight.
© 2022 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on Bankrate.com. The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.
All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to improve the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the Bankrate.com rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.
Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.
Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.