VONG Vs. SCHG ETF: Picking the Growth ETF That Fits 2026 Trends

Investors looking to gain exposure to growth stocks often turn to exchange-traded funds (ETFs) for diversification, cost efficiency, and ease of trading. Among the most popular options are Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NASDAQ:VONG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (NYSE:SCHG). Both ETFs target large-cap growth stocks in the U.S., but they differ in composition, sector concentration, and performance characteristics. Understanding these nuances can help investors choose the ETF best suited to today's market conditions, particularly amid the ongoing sector and asset rotation trends of 2026.

VONG and SCHG: Overview and Composition

Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF tracks the Russell 1000 Growth Index, which includes large-cap U.S. companies exhibiting above-average growth potential. Its portfolio spans approximately 500 holdings, with significant exposure to technology, consumer discretionary, and healthcare sectors. VONG's top holdings include Apple Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT), and Amazon.com Inc. (NASDAQ:AMZN), reflecting a heavy concentration in mega-cap technology names.

Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, on the other hand, tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. SCHG has slightly broader diversification across growth-oriented large-cap stocks, holding around 120 names. While it also has significant technology exposure, its relative weighting to mega-cap tech is lower compared to VONG. This ETF gives investors more exposure to mid-sized growth companies while maintaining solid stakes in market leaders like Alphabet Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) and Nvidia Corp. (NASDAQ:NVDA).

Sector Concentration Differences

The primary distinction between VONG and SCHG lies in sector concentration. VONG's technology weighting hovers near 50% of its total portfolio, making it highly sensitive to the performance of tech giants. In contrast, SCHG's technology allocation is closer to 40%, offering slightly more balance. SCHG also has higher exposure to healthcare and consumer discretionary mid-caps, giving it potential stability if technology experiences short-term volatility.

This difference becomes particularly relevant amid sector rotation trends. In early 2026, investors are increasingly rotating out of high-flying mega-cap technology stocks and into small- and mid-cap growth names, energy, and industrial sectors. VONG's concentrated exposure to mega-cap tech may make it more volatile in the short term, while SCHG's broader diversification could offer a smoother ride.

Performance Comparison

Looking at the past year, both ETFs have delivered strong performance, reflecting a rebound in U.S. growth stocks following the market's adjustment to 2025's inflation and rate fluctuations. As of January 10, 2026, VONG has returned approximately 14.8% year-to-date, while SCHG trails slightly at 13.5%. While VONG has slightly outperformed, this comes with higher sector concentration risk.

Over the past five years, VONG has averaged an annual return of 16.2%, compared with SCHG's 15.6%, illustrating that the two ETFs are closely matched in long-term growth potential. However, VONG tends to exhibit higher volatility, which may not suit investors with a lower risk tolerance or those wary of potential pullbacks in technology stocks.

Expense Ratios and Costs

Liquidity and Trading Considerations

Liquidity is another factor. VONG averages around 300,000 shares traded daily, compared to SCHG's 450,000 shares. Higher liquidity generally translates to tighter bid-ask spreads, making it slightly easier for investors to enter or exit positions in SCHG, particularly for those trading in larger quantities.

Where Today's Market Conditions Favor Each ETF

The choice between VONG and SCHG often hinges on current market conditions and investment goals. In early 2026, several trends are shaping investor preferences:

Practical Takeaways for Investors

For investors deciding between VONG and SCHG today, several practical takeaways emerge:

Choosing the Right Growth Play

Ultimately, the decision between these two ETFs comes down to risk tolerance, investment horizon, and portfolio composition. Both funds are well-positioned to participate in the ongoing growth story of the U.S. equity market, making them essential considerations for investors seeking large-cap growth exposure in 2026.

Benzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

VONG and SCHG: Overview and Composition

Sector Concentration Differences

Performance Comparison

Expense Ratios and Costs

Cost considerations also play a role. VONG carries an expense ratio of 0.04%, while SCHG is slightly lower at 0.03%. Though both are exceptionally low-cost options, the minor difference may matter for long-term investors seeking to minimize drag on returns. Investors should also consider tracking error, which can influence how closely the ETF mirrors its underlying index. Both funds have historically maintained tight tracking relative to their benchmarks.

Liquidity and Trading Considerations

Where Today's Market Conditions Favor Each ETF

The choice between VONG and SCHG often hinges on current market conditions and investment goals. In early 2026, several trends are shaping investor preferences:

Sector Rotation: Investors are moving away from concentrated mega-cap tech toward more diversified growth exposures. SCHG's broader sector balance may provide a hedge against potential tech pullbacks while capturing upside in mid-cap growth names.
Interest Rate Sensitivity: Growth stocks tend to react more sharply to interest rate changes. With expectations of stable to slightly declining rates in 2026, both ETFs remain attractive, but VONG's tech-heavy composition could offer higher potential returns for those willing to accept volatility.
Risk Appetite: Aggressive investors seeking maximum exposure to tech innovation and AI-driven growth may prefer VONG. Conversely, risk-averse investors or those seeking smoother performance amid rotation trends might lean toward SCHG.
Thematic Exposure: SCHG's moderate exposure to sectors like healthcare and consumer discretionary can capitalize on ongoing spending trends and sector momentum outside of tech, potentially offering more stable returns in the near term.

Practical Takeaways for Investors

For investors deciding between VONG and SCHG today, several practical takeaways emerge:

Aggressive Growth Focus: VONG may be the better choice for investors focused on mega-cap technology and willing to tolerate higher volatility for potentially higher gains.
Balanced Exposure: SCHG offers a more balanced growth exposure, combining mega-cap tech with mid-cap growth and other sectors, which may be preferable in a rotation-heavy market.
Cost and Liquidity: Both ETFs are low-cost and liquid, but SCHG's slightly higher daily trading volume could make it marginally more efficient for frequent traders.
Portfolio Fit: Investors should consider how either ETF complements their broader portfolio. Those already holding concentrated tech positions may prefer SCHG for additional diversification, whereas those seeking maximum tech exposure might favor VONG.

Choosing the Right Growth Play

Both Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) remain compelling options for growth-oriented investors in 2026. VONG provides concentrated exposure to the mega-cap technology leaders driving long-term growth, while SCHG offers broader sector diversification and slightly lower volatility. Today's market, characterized by sector rotation and cautious investor sentiment, may tilt the scales slightly in favor of SCHG for those seeking a balanced approach, while aggressive investors confident in continued tech leadership may find VONG more appealing.

Benzinga Disclaimer: This article is from an unpaid external contributor. It does not represent Benzinga’s reporting and has not been edited for content or accuracy.

SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF