+ 2.58
+ 0.78%
+ 2.29
+ 0.66%
+ 2.93
+ 0.7%
+ 1.55
+ 0.91%

Is The Social Media ETF Decoupling From Facebook?

August 17, 2012 3:58 pm
Share to Linkedin Share to Twitter Share to Facebook Share to Print License More

The woes of the oft-criticized Global X Social Media Index ETF (NASDAQ: SOCL) are by now well-known and easy to explain. As the first and still the only ETF devoted exclusively to the social media space, SOCL has broken new ground. Should the sector eventually capture investors’ attention in a positive way, SOCL will have a compelling first mover advantage over any rival funds that may pop up.

However, in recent months, SOCL has faced a series of problems and plenty of them have been related to Facebook’s (NASDAQ: FB) flop as a public company. There was the theory that the Facebook IPO would validate SOCL as a worthy ETF.

Obviously, Facebook’s price action has been less than supportive in terms of driving SOCL higher. Then there have been the subsequent plunges in shares of Groupon (NASDAQ: GRPN) and Zynga (NASDAQ: ZNGA).

In a perverse way, SOCL’s performance since August 1 highlights the advantages of the market cap weighting methodology used by so many ETFs. The base definition is that as a stock’s market value increases, its weight within a cap-weighted also increases. As the stock’s market value declines, its weight within cap-weighted ETFs also drops.

That is exactly what has happened with Facebook and SOCL. When the stock was initially added to the ETF just a few days after the May IPO, it accounted for 8.8 percent of SOCL’s weight. That was good enough to be SOCL’s third-largest holding. On July 25, Facebook was 8.2 percent of SOCL’s overall weight.

Oddly enough, Facebook’s almost 12 percent plunge since the start of August has proven helpful for SOCL. The fund is up two percent since August 1. As of the close of markets on August, Facebook’s weight in SOCL had fallen to 5.7 percent and the stock is now the ETF’s fifth-largest holding.

Adding to the unusual nature of SOCL’s decent run this month is the fact that Groupon (NASDAQ: GRPN) has slipped 31.1 percent. Zynga is actually in the green in August, but SOCL has outpaced that name as well.

The Zynga case might be another example of a stock’s decline helping SOCL. Back on July 25, the stock represented 3.3 percent of the ETF’s weight. As of August 16, SOCL devoted just 1.98 percent of its weight to the maker of online games. Groupon has seen its weight in SOCL pared to less than 1.4 percent.

With smaller slices of SOCL’s pie going to Facebook, Groupon and Zynga, the ETF has been able to add to the weights of higher quality names. For example, Google (NASDAQ: GOOG) and its Russian equivalent Yandex (NASDAQ: YNDX) are now SOCL’s fourth- and seventh-largest holdings, respectively. Since the start of August, Google has soared 6.7 percent while Yandex has surged nearly 10%.

Perhaps that begs the question if Google, Yandex and LinkedIn (NYSE: LNKD) keep climbing, does SOCL really need Facebook at all?

For more on social media and ETFs, click here.

Related Articles

Tesla, Nio Significantly Cut From Baillie Gifford Portfolio, Here's What The Firm Bought Instead In Q1

Investment management firm Baillie Gifford shed significant stake in electric carmakers Tesla Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) and Nio Inc (NYSE: NIO) in the first quarter and bought shares in vaccine maker Moderna Inc read more

Exclusive: Why Citron Research's Andrew Left Says Jumia Could Be Buyout Target

Citron Research's Andrew Left appeared on Benzinga's YouTube show "PreMarket Prep At The Close" Thursday to discuss Jumia Technologies AG (NYSE: JMIA) in an exclusive interview. read more

Jim Cramer: 'FAANG Owns The Future'

Jim Cramer isn't giving up on FAANG stocks, he said Wednesday night on CNBC's "Mad Money." read more

Facebook And Qualcomm Lead The QQQ Higher Thursday

U.S. indices were trading higher Thursday following strong earnings results from Apple and Facebook while investors also weighed comments from President Biden's address to Congress. Also, the Fed announced on Wednesday it would leave interest rates unchanged. read more