iShares Russell 1000 ETF (ARCA:IWB), Trade Ideas

iShares Russell 1000 ETF

Young,People,Waiting,For,Job,Interview,Indoors

Macro Economic Events

Broad U.S. Equity ETFs

Economics

5 Experts On June Jobs Surprise: Data &#39;All But Ensures&#39; Fed Rate Hike, Says 1 Economist

Bear.Shutterstock

Short Ideas

Movers

Tech

Trading Ideas

ETFs

SNOW

UPST

Brace for Impact: These 5 Overvalued Stocks Face Bearish Pressure In Impending Market Reversal

News

Hedge Funds

General

AAPL

ADNT

ALLY

AMCX

AMZN

AXTA

BABA

Brighthouse Financial, Inc. - Common Stock

BLMN

BRK-B

CARS

CELG

CLDR

CNDT

DLTR

FISV

FLMN

GOOG

INST

JACK

LYFT

MDLZ

MRVL

NAVI

NBSE

NFLX

NLSN

NTUS

PRGO

PTON

SIRI

WORK

Q3 13F Roundup: How Buffett, Einhorn, Ackman And Others Adjusted Their Portfolios

The latest data on nonfarm payrolls (NFPs) in June delivered a surprise Friday as the figure came in at 209,000, missing economist expectations of 225,000 jobs. This marks the lowest print since December 2020 and a notable decline from May&#8217;s revised figure of 306,000, signaling a softening of <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/23/07/33146887/june-nonfarm-payrolls-miss-estimates-unemployment-drops-but-wages-rise-investors-" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">employment momentum last month.</a>
The unemployment rate decreased as predicted, reaching 3.6% in June and remaining only 0.2 percentage points above a five-decade low.
Salary growth rose unexpectedly, as average hourly wages showed a 0.4% month-over-month increase, surpassing expectations of 0.3%, while annual wage growth stood at 4.4%, above the 4.2% expected. 
In terms of stock reactions, small-cap stocks in the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IWB#NYSE">IWB</a>) rose 0.7%, outperforming large caps in the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPY#NYSE">SPY</a>), down 0.1%. 
Following the release of the jobs report, economists weighed in on the implications of the data:
<ol>
<li>Quincy Krosby, chief global strategist for LPL Financial, acknowledged that NFPs fell below consensus estimates but still indicate a resilient labor market. The unemployment rate at 3.6% will continue to keep the Fed in play for additional rate hikes, he said. Krosby highlighted the importance of next week&#8217;s CPI report in determining whether inflation is decreasing at a satisfactory pace for the Federal Reserve&#8217;s future rate hike decisions. </li>
<li>Jeffrey Roach, chief economist for LPL Financial, focused on the increase in average hourly earnings, which grew at a faster rate than expected. Roach said that wages are running &#8220;too hot for central bankers trying to quell inflation.&#8221; The market for blue-collar workers remains extremely tight as businesses appear desperate to attract and retain workers. &#8220;The latest jobs report all but ensures the Fed will increase rates later this month,&#8221; Roach said. </li>
<li>Adam Crisafulli, Vital Knowledge Media LLC founder, emphasized that the headline NFP figure, although lower than the ADP report, indicates decent job creation and is unlikely to significantly impact the Fed&#8217;s outlook. The expert noted that private job creation was relatively weak at 149,000, the prior months&#8217; revisions were negative and wages ran hotter than expected, which he said suggests a combination closer to the &#8220;stagflation&#8221; end of the spectrum. </li>
<li>Dave Gilbertson, labor economist at UKG, said that while job growth might not be as explosive as in May, it is still healthy and reflects a stable labor market. He highlighted the continued demand for labor in sectors such as retail, hospitality and health care, and said the balance of power favors the blue-collar workforce. </li>
<li>Joseph Brusuelas, chief economist at RSM US LLP, tweeted that a remarkable streak of robust monthly job gains continued in June, with the economy creating 209,000 new jobs and the unemployment rate standing at 3.6%. Total employment has increased by 1.77 million in 2023, with the economy creating an average of 296,500 jobs per month.</li>
</ol>
Read more: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/23/07/33140458/the-chart-no-stock-investor-wants-to-see-10-year-treasury-yields-rise-above-infla" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The Chart No Stock Investor Wants To See: 10-Year Treasury Yields Rise Above Inflation For The First Time In Three Years Edit Edit New CMS Republish Revisions Workflow Nodequeue Translate Clear Cache Alert Tools</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Chart: Annual Wage Growth Remains Well Above Pre-Covid Levels</h2>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" width="1024" height="793" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07094354/USAHEYY_2023-07-07_15-43-28_a4358-1024x793.png" alt="" class="wp-image-64072" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07094354/USAHEYY_2023-07-07_15-43-28_a4358-1024x793.png 1024w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07094354/USAHEYY_2023-07-07_15-43-28_a4358-300x232.png 300w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07094354/USAHEYY_2023-07-07_15-43-28_a4358-768x595.png 768w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07094354/USAHEYY_2023-07-07_15-43-28_a4358-1536x1190.png 1536w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/07094354/USAHEYY_2023-07-07_15-43-28_a4358.png 1588w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
Photo via Shutterstock.

5 Experts On June Jobs Surprise: Data 'All But Ensures' Fed Rate Hike, Says 1 Economist

The U.S. stock market began on Tuesday (June 20) to show the first signs of a reversal from the impressive surge that began in early May as investors worry about the future path of monetary policy ahead of impending Federal Reserve Chair Jerome <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/economics/macro-economic-events/23/06/32924024/powell-to-testify-before-congress-after-fed-pause-what-the-market-is-watching-for" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Powell&#8217;s testimony before the U.S. Congress.</a>
A wave of negative&nbsp;performance hit all the main U.S. stock indexes and sectors on Tuesday, giving the market an overall gloomy feel.
The market alert was initially flagged by Benzinga last Friday (June 16), when it reported the relative strength index (RSI) for the S&amp;P 500 Index had reached its <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/broad-u-s-equity-etfs/23/06/32896664/ai-frenzy-pushes-s-p-500s-rsi-to-most-overbought-level-since-november-2021-what-does-h" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">most overbought level since November 2021</a>, signaling that bullish momentum had likely peaked.
Based on their&nbsp;valuation metrics, such as the forward price-to-earnings ratio and the forward price-to-sales ratio, five overvalued stocks that are part of the holdings of the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IWB#NYSE">IWB</a>) have been identified as being particularly vulnerable to an uptick in bearish momentum if the current market decline intensifies.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">5 Overvalued Stocks Poised For Bears&#8217; Comeback</h2>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">5) Cloudflare, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NET#NYSE">NET</a>)</h3>
<ul>
<li>Cloudfare is a web infrastructure and security company providing a range of services to enhance website performance and protect against cyber threats.</li>
<li>Forward price-to-earnings ratio (based on the next 12 months expected earnings): 191.7x</li>
<li>Forward price-to-sales ratio (based on the next 12 months expected revenues): 16.3x</li>
<li>Year-to-date performance: 44%</li>
<li>Short interest: 6.34%</li>
</ul>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" width="1024" height="689" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115231/NET_2023-06-20_17-52-11_929fd-1024x689.png" alt="" class="wp-image-54772" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115231/NET_2023-06-20_17-52-11_929fd-1024x689.png 1024w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115231/NET_2023-06-20_17-52-11_929fd-300x202.png 300w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115231/NET_2023-06-20_17-52-11_929fd-768x517.png 768w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115231/NET_2023-06-20_17-52-11_929fd-1536x1033.png 1536w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115231/NET_2023-06-20_17-52-11_929fd.png 1834w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">4) Upstart Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/UPST#NASDAQ">UPST</a>)</h3>
<ul>
<li>Upstart is an innovative lending platform that utilizes artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms to assess creditworthiness and offer personalized loans to individuals.</li>
<li>Forward P/E Ratio: 211.4x</li>
<li>Forward P/S Ratio: 4.5x</li>
<li>Year-to-date performance: 147%</li>
<li>Short interest: 29.7%</li>
</ul>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" width="1024" height="689" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115549/UPST_2023-06-20_17-55-38_c46de-1024x689.png" alt="" class="wp-image-54773" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115549/UPST_2023-06-20_17-55-38_c46de-1024x689.png 1024w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115549/UPST_2023-06-20_17-55-38_c46de-300x202.png 300w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115549/UPST_2023-06-20_17-55-38_c46de-768x517.png 768w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115549/UPST_2023-06-20_17-55-38_c46de-1536x1033.png 1536w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20115549/UPST_2023-06-20_17-55-38_c46de.png 1834w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">3) MongoDB, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MDB#NASDAQ">MDB</a>)</h3>
<ul>
<li>MongoDB, Inc. is a leading provider of modern, document-oriented database software, offering a flexible and scalable solution for managing structured and unstructured data in diverse applications and environments.</li>
<li>Forward P/E Ratio: 256.3x</li>
<li>Forward P/S Ratio: 16.5x</li>
<li>Year-to-date performance: 89%</li>
<li>Short interest: 5.07%</li>
</ul>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" width="1024" height="689" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120038/MDB_2023-06-20_18-00-27_85cc6-1024x689.png" alt="" class="wp-image-54776" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120038/MDB_2023-06-20_18-00-27_85cc6-1024x689.png 1024w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120038/MDB_2023-06-20_18-00-27_85cc6-300x202.png 300w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120038/MDB_2023-06-20_18-00-27_85cc6-768x517.png 768w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120038/MDB_2023-06-20_18-00-27_85cc6-1536x1033.png 1536w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120038/MDB_2023-06-20_18-00-27_85cc6.png 1834w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">2) Snowflake, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SNOW#NYSE">SNOW</a>)</h3>
<ul>
<li>Snowflake is a cloud-based data platform that enables organizations to store, manage and analyze vast amounts of data in a highly scalable and secure manner, helping businesses derive valuable insights and make data-driven decisions.</li>
<li>Forward P/E Ratio: 292.4x</li>
<li>Forward P/S Ratio: 19.6x</li>
<li>Year-to-date performance: 21%</li>
<li>Short interest: 4.4%</li>
</ul>
<figure class="wp-block-image size-large"><img decoding="async" loading="lazy" width="1024" height="689" src="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120436/SNOW_2023-06-20_18-03-52_ed7fb-1024x689.png" alt="" class="wp-image-54780" srcset="https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120436/SNOW_2023-06-20_18-03-52_ed7fb-1024x689.png 1024w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120436/SNOW_2023-06-20_18-03-52_ed7fb-300x202.png 300w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120436/SNOW_2023-06-20_18-03-52_ed7fb-768x517.png 768w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120436/SNOW_2023-06-20_18-03-52_ed7fb-1536x1033.png 1536w,https://s3.amazonaws.com/editorial.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/20120436/SNOW_2023-06-20_18-03-52_ed7fb.png 1834w" sizes="(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px" /></figure>
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">1) 10x Genomics, Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TXG#NASDAQ">TXG</a>)</h3>
<ul>
<li>Description: 10x Genomics is a biotechnology company focused on developing advanced genomic tools and technologies to enable researchers to gain deeper insights into biology and accelerate discoveries in areas such as cancer research, immunology, and drug development.</li>
<li>Forward P/E Ratio: 381.1x</li>
<li>Forward P/S Ratio: 10.6x</li>
<li>Year-to-date performance: 57%</li>
<li>Short interest: 4.6%</li>
</ul>
Read Next: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/government/23/06/32928945/senate-banking-committee-gears-up-for-vote-on-seizing-executive-compensation-following-bank-failures" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Senate Banking Committee Gears Up For Vote On Seizing Executive Compensation Following Bank Failures: Sen. Warren Says Bankers Can&#8217;t &#8216;Walk Away Scot-Free&#8217;</a>

WIIM

SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust

US indices are trading higher after Pfizer and BioNTech announced data from their BNT162 mRNA-based coronavirus vaccine program, which showed the drug created neutralizing antibodies.

The latest round of 13F filings from institutional investors is out, revealing to the world the stocks that some of the richest and most successful investors have been buying and selling.
<h3>Takeaways From 13F Season</h3>
Investors who follow particular fund managers can easily look up what each was buying and selling in the quarter, but other investors may be more interested in overall themes from 13F filings. Overall, it appears buying and selling among fund managers was split relatively evenly in the third quarter.
<ul>
<li>Surprisingly, despite a 27.1% drop in Netflix, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/nflx#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>) shares in the third quarter, no major fund manager mentioned below was buying or selling shares.</li>
<li>The FANG group didn&rsquo;t get much attention at all in the third quarter aside from David Tepper buying Facebook, Amazon and Google.</li>
<li>Carl Icahn took a gamble on Caesars Entertainment, while George Soros dialed back his position.</li>
<li>Several fund managers made major adjustments to their ETF positions, including Tepper selling the XOP ETF, Leon Cooperman buying the GLD ETF, and Soros selling both the QQQ and the IWB funds.</li>
<li>As interest rates fell, dividend stocks were getting some love this quarter, with fund managers buying stocks like General Motors, BP and Carnival, each of which yield more than 4%.</li>
</ul>
Here&rsquo;s a rundown of how the smart money was playing some of the most popular stocks last quarter.
<h3>David Einhorn&rsquo;s Greenlight Capital</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Chemours Co (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/cc#NYSE">CC</a>)</li>
<li>Brighthouse Financial Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/bhf#NASDAQ">BHF</a>)</li>
<li>General Motors Company (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/gm#NYSE">GM</a>)</li>
<li>Neubase Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/nbse#NASDAQ">NBSE</a>)</li>
<li>Adient PLC (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/adnt#NYSE">ADNT</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>David Tepper&rsquo;s Appaloosa Management</h3>
<ul>
<li>Hilton Grand Vacations Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/hgv#NYSE">HGV</a>)</li>
<li>KAR Auction Services Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/kar#NYSE">KAR</a>)</li>
<li>Valaris PLC (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/val#NYSE">VAL</a>)</li>
<li>Dillard&#39;s, Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/dds#NYSE">DDS</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Alphabet Inc Class C (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/goog#NASDAQ">GOOG</a>)</li>
<li>Micron Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/mu#NASDAQ">MU</a>)</li>
<li>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd - ADR (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/baba#NYSE">BABA</a>)</li>
<li>Facebook, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/fb#NASDAQ">FB</a>)</li>
<li>Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amzn#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>)</li>
<li>PG&amp;E Corporation (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/pcg#NYSE">PCG</a>)</li>
<li>Boeing Co (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ba#NYSE">BA</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>SPDR S&amp;P Oil &amp; Gas Explore &amp; Prod. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/xop#NYSE">XOP</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Leon Cooperman&rsquo;s Omega Advisors</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Fiserv Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/fisv#NASDAQ">FISV</a>)</li>
<li>SPDR Gold Trust (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/gld#NYSE">GLD</a>)</li>
<li>Nabors Industries Ltd. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/nbr#NYSE">NBR</a>)</li>
<li>Carnival Corp (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ccl#NYSE">CCL</a>)</li>
<li>Navient Corp (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/navi#NASDAQ">NAVI</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Decreases:
<ul>
<li>Nielsen Holdings PLC (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/nlsn#NYSE">NLSN</a>)</li>
<li>Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/tmo#NYSE">TMO</a>)</li>
<li>AMC NETWORKS INC (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amcx#NASDAQ">AMCX</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Barry Rosenstein&rsquo;s Jana Partners</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Instructure Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/inst#NYSE">INST</a>)</li>
<li>Bloomin&#39; Brands Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/blmn#NASDAQ">BLMN</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>Axalta Coating Systems Ltd (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/axta#NYSE">AXTA</a>)</li>
<li>Zimmer Biomet Holdings Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/zbh#NYSE">ZBH</a>)</li>
<li>HD Supply Holdings Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/hds#NASDAQ">HDS</a>)</li>
<li>Jack in the Box Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/jack#NASDAQ">JACK</a>)</li>
<li>Falcon Minerals Corp (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/flmn#NASDAQ">FLMN</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Jeff Smith&rsquo;s Starboard Value</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Perrigo Company PLC (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/prgo#NYSE">PRGO</a>)</li>
<li>Natus Medical Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ntus#NASDAQ">NTUS</a>)</li>
<li>Marvell Technology Group Ltd. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/mrvl#NASDAQ">MRVL</a>)</li>
<li>Dollar Tree, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/dltr#NASDAQ">DLTR</a>)</li>
<li>Cars.com Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/cars#NYSE">CARS</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>Box Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/box#NYSE">BOX</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Warren Buffett&rsquo;s Berkshire Hathaway</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Occidental Petroleum Corporation (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/oxy#NYSE">OXY</a>)</li>
<li>Restoration Hardware Holdings, Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/rh#NYSE">RH</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>Wells Fargo &amp; Co (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/wfc#NYSE">WFC</a>)</li>
<li>Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/aapl#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>)</li>
<li>Phillips 66 (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/psx#NYSE">PSX</a>)</li>
<li>Sirius XM Holdings Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/siri#NASDAQ">SIRI</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>George Soros&rsquo; Soros Fund Management</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Peloton Interactive Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/pton#NASDAQ">PTON</a>)</li>
<li>Ally Financial Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ally#NYSE">ALLY</a>)</li>
<li>BP plc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/bp#NYSE">BP</a>)</li>
<li>Citigroup Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/c#NYSE">C</a>)</li>
<li>Celgene Corporation (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/celg#NASDAQ">CELG</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>PowerShares QQQ Trust, Series 1 (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/qqq#NASDAQ">QQQ</a>)</li>
<li>Caesars Entertainment Corporation (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/czr#NASDAQ">CZR</a>)</li>
<li>Walt Disney Co (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/dis#NYSE">DIS</a>)</li>
<li>iShares Russell 1000 Index (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>)</li>
<li>Morgan Stanley (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ms#NYSE">MS</a>)</li>
<li>Slack Technologies Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/work#NYSE">WORK</a>)</li>
<li>LYFT Inc (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/lyft#NASDAQ">LYFT</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Carl Icahn&rsquo;s Icahn Capital</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>HP Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/hpq#NYSE">HPQ</a>)</li>
<li>Cloudera Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/cldr#NYSE">CLDR</a>)</li>
<li>Icahn Enterprises LP (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iep#NASDAQ">IEP</a>)</li>
<li>Hertz Global Holdings Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/htz#NYSE">HTZ</a>)</li>
<li>Conduent Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/cndt#NYSE">CNDT</a>)</li>
<li>Caesars Entertainment</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>Cheniere Energy, Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/lng#NYSE">LNG</a>)</li>
<li>Freeport-McMoRan Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/fcx#NYSE">FCX</a>)</li>
<li>Occidental Petroleum</li>
</ul>
<h3>Bill Ackman&rsquo;s Pershing Square Capital</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Berkshire Hathaway Inc. Class B (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/brk-b#NYSE">BRK-B</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Reductions:
<ul>
<li>Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/adp#NASDAQ">ADP</a>)</li>
<li>Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/cmg#NYSE">CMG</a>)</li>
<li>Hilton Hotels Corporation (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/hlt#NYSE">HLT</a>)</li>
<li>Restaurant Brands International Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/qsr#NYSE">QSR</a>)</li>
<li>Lowe&#39;s Companies, Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/low#NYSE">LOW</a>)</li>
<li>United Technologies Corporation (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/utx#NYSE">UTX</a>)</li>
</ul>
<h3>Nelson Peltz&rsquo;s Trian Partners</h3>
Notable Q3 Buys/Increases:
<ul>
<li>Procter &amp; Gamble Co (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/pg#NYSE">PG</a>)</li>
<li>MONDELEZ INTERNATIONAL INC (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/mdlz#NASDAQ">MDLZ</a>)</li>
<li>Legg Mason Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/lm#NYSE">LM</a>)</li>
<li>General Electric Company (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ge#NYSE">GE</a>)</li>
</ul>
Notable Q3 Sells/Decreases:
<ul>
<li>PPG Industries, Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ppg#NYSE">PPG</a>)</li>
<li>Wendys Co (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/wen#NASDAQ">WEN</a>)</li>
<li>Bank of New York Mellon Corp (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/bk#NYSE">BK</a>)</li>
</ul>
Related Links:
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/19/08/14278097/q2-13f-roundup-how-buffett-einhorn-ackman-and-others-adjusted-their-portfolios">Q2 13F Roundup: How Buffett, Einhorn, Ackman And Others Adjusted Their Portfolios </a>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/education/18/08/12204520/what-is-the-buffett-indicator">What Is The Buffett Indicator?</a>

Small-cap stocks and exchange traded funds are lagging their large-cap counterparts this. A comparison of the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwm#NYSE">IWM</a>) and the large-cap iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>) confirms as much.
<h3>What&#39;s Happened</h3>
Entering Wednesday, IWB was 17.2% year to date, outpacing the small-cap IWM by 510 basis points. However, the large/small gap has been particularly noticeable in recent months. Over the past 90 days, IWB is up 1.6% while IWM is lower by 2.7%, a chasm that&#39;s prompting some market observers to speculate that weakness in small-cap stocks is portending a broader market slump, or worse, a recession.
The small-cap slump is potentially more concerning when considering smaller companies are usually more domestically focused, meaning they offer some insulation <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/19/08/14288757/dont-ignore-this-low-volatility-etf">from trade wars</a>.
<h3>Why It&#39;s Important</h3>
As is to be expected, IWB and IWM have different sector exposures and the increasingly one-side rival between the two ETFs may be best explained by highlighting one of the most obvious sector differentials.
IWM&#39;s largest sector weight <a href="https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239710/?referrer=tickerSearch">is financial services</a> at nearly 18%, making the ETF vulnerable to declining net interest margins at the hands of lower interest rates. The large-cap IWB allocates less than 13% of its weight to financials, that ETF&#39;s third-largest sector exposure. IWB&#39;s top sector weight is technology at 22.27%.
&ldquo;While many factors impact size performance, sector exposures tell a big part of the story. A detailed look at industry weights helps explain recent small-cap underperformance,&rdquo; said FTSE Russell Managing Director Alec Young <a href="https://www.ftserussell.com/">in a recent note</a>.
&ldquo;It&rsquo;s no secret technology has been strongly outperforming the financial sector as a flattening yield curve and unprecedented declines in interest rates squeeze bank profits. The small cap benchmark sports for a hefty 27% financial industry weight vs. only 21% for its large-cap counterpart. What&rsquo;s more, large caps also have greater exposure to technology performance leadership with a 22% weight versus only 13% for the Russell 2000 Index.&rdquo;
<h3>What&#39;s Next</h3>
While the sector weights in IWB and IWM aren&#39;t going to change dramatically anytime soon, the aforementioned points may be mostly baked into the funds.
&ldquo;The financial sector has had a very strong correlation with the direction of US treasury yields for several years and has begun to perk up as rates have stabilized,&rdquo; said Young. &ldquo;As for technology, the sector&rsquo;s valuation premium is now well above its historical average reflecting structural growth tailwinds that are now widely appreciated. All this means that it may be time to re-evaluate small cap allocations.&rdquo;
Related Links:
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/19/08/14303172/revenge-of-the-nerd-this-esports-etf-could-be-a-winner">An Excellent Esports ETF</a>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cannabis/19/08/14303187/another-cannabis-etf-is-in-the-works">Another Cannabis ETF Is On The Way</a>

Long Ideas

Small Cap Analysis

Small Cap

What's Ailing Small-Caps? A Sector Differential Solves The Mystery

Growth stocks and the related exchange traded funds took their lumps in May, but year to date, the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwf#NYSE">IWF</a>) is higher by 18.40 percent, an advantage of 530 basis points over the iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwd#NYSE">IWD</a>).
IWF is beating the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>) by 270 basis points.
<h3>What To Know</h3>
Growth stocks, including those residing in ETFs like IWF, usually command higher multiples than value equivalents or the broader market. Hence, the growth designation. Those premiums are usually persistent, but growth&#39;s outperformance of value is lengthy by historical standards, though some of that outperformance is attributable to growth often topping value following recessions.
&ldquo;Growth&rsquo;s recent out-performance conforms to the post-crisis norm,&rdquo; <a href="https://www.blackrockblog.com/2019/06/07/growth-premium-steady/">said BlackRock in a recent note</a>. &ldquo;Focusing on price returns, since 2010 growth has outperformed value by an average of approximately 350 bps a year. The outperformance has not only been meaningful, it has been consistent. During the past five years value has only outperformed meaningfully on one occasion, 2016.&rdquo;
Over the past three years, IWF is up 58.10 percent while IWD, the value ETF, is higher by 29.90 percent.
<h3>Why It&#39;s Important</h3>
As is often discussed with growth ETFs, the technology sector is a prime determinant of the growth factor&#39;s returns. IWF allocates over a third of its weight to technology stocks compared to 21.45 percent in the Russell 1000 Index.
&ldquo;As others have noted, a large part of growth&rsquo;s winning streak can be attributed to stellar earnings growth, particularly from technology companies,&rdquo; said BlackRock. &ldquo;That said, multiple expansion, i.e. paying more for a dollar of earnings, has played a part as well. Since the 2011 market bottom, the trailing price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio for the Russell 1000 Growth Index is up roughly 65%. In contrast, the value index&rsquo;s P/E ratio has expanded by a more modest 40%.&rdquo;
With the overweight in technology stocks, IWF&#39;s annualized volatility over the past three years was 14.40 percent, but that was just 180 basis points higher than the same metric on the Russell 1000 Index.
<h3>What&#39;s Next</h3>
For growth investors or those considering IWF, the good news is, on valuation, growth is not expensive relative to historical norms. It simply looks pricey relative to value because value is trading well below its usual multiples.
&ldquo;But while growth stocks are not particularly cheap, it is not obvious that they are expensive,&rdquo; said BlackRock. &ldquo;Valuations are slightly below the long-term average. In other words, the fact that growth looks stretched relative to value is not a function of growth being particularly rich but value being very cheap.&rdquo;
Related Links:
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/biotech/19/06/13879145/its-time-to-consider-leveraged-healthcare-etfs">Leveraged Healthcare ETFs Look Good</a>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/19/06/13869712/a-new-trade-war-etf-arrives-right-on-time">Just In Time For This Trade War ETF</a>

Growth ETFs Can Keep Commanding Premiums Over Value

Few stocks have been immune from the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/18/10/12488010/dow-falls-1-300-points-in-48-hours-as-market-rout-conti">broad market&#39;s two-day tumble</a>. Among the punished are companies with direct exposure to the exchange traded funds industry.
This week, shares of BlackRock Inc. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/blk#NYSE">BLK</a>), the world&#39;s largest assets manager and ETF issuer&nbsp;and WisdomTree Investments, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/wetf#NASDAQ">WETF</a>), the only publicly traded pure play ETF sponsor, are among the ETF-related stocks getting drubbed.
<h3>What Happened</h3>
Shares of BlackRock are lower by 11.91 percent this week. Invesco Ltd. (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ivz#NYSE">IVZ</a>), the fourth-largest U.S. ETF issuer, has seen its shares tumble 13.57 percent over the same span.
&ldquo;Increased volatility has led to an increase in U.S.-domiciled ETF outflows at BLK and IVZ, although it appears that WETF has had break-even flows in the U.S. This exhibit excludes non-U.S. Domiciled ETF flows,&rdquo; said Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods analysts Robert Lee and Pell Bermingham in a note out Thursday.
Shares of BlackRock, the owner of the iShares ETF brand, slid 7 percent Wednesday. The KBW analysts offer some insight into the impact of ETF outflows on the stock.
&ldquo;Simplistically, if we assume the average fee rate on equity ETFs is about 26bp with a 70% incremental margin, then (all else equal) -$100bn of outflows would impact EPS about -$0.85 (our current 2019 EPS forecast is $29.56),&rdquo; the analysts said. &ldquo;However, this would also be highly dependent upon the mix. For example, if the outflows were predominately in lower fee core products where average fee rates are below 10bps the impact would be significantly less.&rdquo;
<h3>Why It&#39;s Important</h3>
For the week ended Oct. 10, five of the 10 worst ETFs in terms of lost assets are iShares funds, more than any other issuer. The iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>), the iShares iBoxx USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/hyg#NYSE">HYG</a>) and the iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/agg#NYSE">AGG</a>) are among the offending funds.
To be fair, BlackRock&#39;s iShares is the largest ETF issuer in terms of number of funds and three of its funds were also among the top asset gatherers for the week ended Oct. 10.
&ldquo;In this context, the -7% decline in BLK yesterday to the extent it was exacerbated by concerns over ETF outflows, may be overdone,&rdquo; said the KBW analysts.
KBW has an Outperform rating on BlackRock and Market Perform ratings on Invesco and WisdomTree.
Related Links:
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/18/10/12496892/s-p-500-etfs-just-did-something-they-havent-done-in-a-while">S&amp;P 500 ETFs Just Did Something They Haven&#39;t Done In A While</a>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/18/10/12469751/earnings-bell-rings-for-these-leveraged-etfs">Bell Tolls For These Leveraged ETFs</a>

Analyst Color

Bonds

Markets

WETF

How Market Volatility Is Affecting Some ETF Issuers

&quot;The key to making money in stocks is not to get scared out of them.&quot; -Peter Lynch
The term investing refers to risking one&#39;s capital with the hope of generating future returns. Not everyone commits their capital with the same objective, which often varies with age, risk tolerance, personal needs, the time period, investable surplus and even temperament.
It is only by adopting a carefully thought-out strategy that an investor can generate maximum returns while assuming minimum risk.
Fundamentally, investing approaches can be categorized into growth and value investing. Let&#39;s delve&nbsp;into these two approaches by looking at what each means, the pros and cons associated with each&nbsp;and how one compares against the other.
<h3>Value Investing: Hunting Bargains</h3>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/investing/guide-to-value-investing/">Value investing </a> is an approach where an investor roots for an underperforming stock in which they see&nbsp;future appreciation potential.
The late Benjamin Graham, who is known as one of the fathers of value investing along with David Dodd, put forth a concept called intrinsic value, which is justified by a company&#39;s assets, earnings, dividends and financial strength.
Intrinsic value&nbsp;is the perceived value of a company calculated using fundamental analysis by taking into account all tangible and intangible factors,<a href="https://www.investopedia.com/terms/i/intrinsicvalue.asp">&nbsp;according to Investopedia</a>.
In simple terms, value investing is a strategy of investing in stocks that trade at less than their intrinsic value or those which trade at a discounted valuation.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/investing/guide-to-value-investing/">A Guide To Value Investing</a>
Altria Group Inc (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/mo#NYSE">MO</a>), with a trailing-twelve month P/E of 10.39, can be described as a value stock. The stock is trading down about 16 percent year-to-date as of July 31.
Value investors typically look for a margin of safety&nbsp;and therefore pick stocks trading at a bigger discount than the intrinsic value provides.
Graham&#39;s logic for the intrinsic value focus is that it will keep investors from being swayed by extreme emotions running through the markets.
The following are the criteria that were outlined by Graham for screening value stocks:
<ul>
<li>Companies with atings (based on S&amp;P) of B+ or better.</li>
<li>Total debt to current asset ratio of less than 1.1.</li>
<li>Current ratio of over 1.5.</li>
<li>Positive earnings growth during the past five years.</li>
<li>Price/earnings ratio of 9 or less.&nbsp;</li>
<li>Price/book value of less than 1.2.</li>
<li>Dividend-paying companies.</li>
</ul>
How Intrinsic Value Is Calculated
<ul>
<li>
The discounted cash flow method, which discounts all expected future cash flows at an appropriate&nbsp;rate to arrive at the net present value.
</li>
<li>Multiples valuation, which takes the trailing 12-month EPS multiplied by expected P/E, or EBITDA multiplied by current EV/EBITDA ratio, or sales multiplied by the P/sales ratio.</li>
<li>The dividend discount model, which discounts&nbsp;back all the future dividend payments of a company.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Growth Investing: Betting On The Future</h3>
Growth investing, as the name implies, lends a growth focus, as investors scout&nbsp;high-growth companies that generate above-average growth relative to the industry in which they operate. This approach doesn&#39;t shun expensive stocks&nbsp;and recommends buying them if they&nbsp;have superlative growth potential.
The accent here is on the equity with the highest growth potential, rather than on valuation metrics that delineate&nbsp;a stock as cheap or expensive.
Amazon.com, Inc. (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/amzn#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>), which went public in 1997 at $18 per share, is now close to $1,800 over a 20-year period. This represents an appreciation of about 10,000 percent.
<img alt="amzn.png" src="/files/u101977/amzn.png" style="height:286px; width:800px" />
Although <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/18/07/12089661/amazons-q2-was-a-show-of-power-morgan-stanley-says"> Amazon&#39;s </a> valuation is astronomical, it is still considered a growth stock given the attractive opportunity presented by e-commerce and the cloud. Amazon Web Services has been generating revenue growth at a year-over-year clip of 40-plus&nbsp;percent.
The company&#39;s subscription services, which comprise annual and monthly fees associated with Amazon Prime membership &mdash;&nbsp;as well as audiobook, e-book, digital video, digital music&nbsp;and other non-AWS subscription services &mdash; also offer&nbsp;high growth potential. Excluding forex, subscription services clocked in revenue growth of 55 percent in the most recent quarter.
See Also: <a href=" https://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/18/07/12091149/which-is-the-better-buy-netflix-or-chinas-fast-growing-">Which Is The Better Buy: Netflix Or China&#39;s Fast-Growing Iqiyi?</a>
Screening Growth Stocks
Several criteria exist for selecting a growth stock, and some basic screening criteria are listed below:
<ul>
<li>Zero in on a sector showing sustainable growth; tech stocks usually qualify.</li>
<li>Look for industries and sectors with&nbsp;high barriers to entry.</li>
<li>Consistently rising sales.</li>
<li>Strong historical earnings growth: over 15-percent growth over the past three years.</li>
<li>Earnings growth outperforming the market as a whole.</li>
<li>Robust profit margins.</li>
<li>Improving return on equity.</li>
<li>Strong stock performance.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Growth Vs. Value Investing</h3>
The growth vs. value debate has been raging on for some time now, although there hasn&#39;t been a clear verdict in favor of either of the investment themes.
Value stocks outperformed growth stocks over a 90-year period beginning in 1926 by 17 percent to 12.6 percent, <a href="https://www.fool.com/investing/2016/06/19/growth-stocks-vs-value-stocks-over-the-long-term-y.aspx">The Motley Fool quoted</a> Bank of America Merrill Lynch Chief Investment Strategist Michael Hartnett as saying. Value stocks outperformed growth stocks in about three out of every five years, he said.
Yet growth stocks have outperformed value stocks in most years since 2006.
<img alt="306651_cyclicality.png" src="/files/u101977/306651_cyclicality.png" style="height:474px; width:750px" />
The success of either of these strategies is contingent on certain factors such as the stage of the economic cycle, the interest rate environment, credit costs and market cycles.&nbsp;
Growth stocks do well when economic growth is decelerating, as investors seek out high-growth companies with predictable earnings streams.
On the contrary, value stocks tend to outperform when the economy is growing.
Value stocks are generally thought to be a better bet in a rising interest rate environment. &quot;Value stocks have outperformed in 14 of the last 17 rate-tightening periods,&quot; <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2015/12/09/bet-on-value-stocks-in-2016-as-interest-rates-rise-traders.html">CNBC</a> quoted Patrick O&#39;Shaughnessy of O&#39;Shaughnessy Asset Management as saying.
Value stocks have strong existing cash flows, and the cash flow certainty drives investors toward them when interest rates rise. Growth stocks are valued on future earnings, making investors skeptical of their investment worthiness in a rising rate environment.
A bullish market is supportive of growth stocks, while value stocks fare better in a bearish market&nbsp;as risk averse investors flock to bargains.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/investing/best-long-term-investments/">Best Long-Term Investments</a>
<h3>Relative 1-Year Performance Of Growth Vs. Value Stocks</h3>
The iShares Russell 1000 Index (ETF) (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>) has gained about 9.1 percent over the past year compared to the 18.4-percent advance by the iShares Russell 1000 Growth Index (ETF) (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwf#NYSE">IWF</a>).
This has been the story over the past decade, with growth stocks outperforming their value counterparts, marking one of the longest periods of outperformance by growth stocks.
This dynamic could change going forward, if <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/story/the-stock-market-just-experienced-the-most-seismic-shift-from-growth-to-value-since-lehman-brothers-says-nomura-2018-07-31"> comments </a> by Charlie McElligott, head of cross-asset strategy at Nomura, are to be believed.
The three-day move in&nbsp;U.S. value/growth suggest&nbsp;the market may be rotating out of growth stocks and into value stocks in a big way &mdash;&nbsp;the biggest since the rotation that happened after the collapse of Lehman in September&nbsp;2008, McElligott was quoted as saying by MarketWatch.
<h3>Final Thoughts</h3>
Since both value and growth investing have their own merits and demerits, investors should look to include both value and growth stocks in their portfolio, as such a strategy will help generate returns irrespective of how the factors impacting the two investment styles pan out.

Education

Personal Finance

What Is Growth Investing And Value Investing?

Index provider FTSE Russell finalizes its annual index reconstitution today, making for brisk trading activity as well as some changes for some well-known exchange traded funds.
Each year on the final Friday of June, &ldquo;stocks are added or deleted to the Russell 1000 large cap and Russell 2000 small cap, prompting fund managers to adjust their portfolios to reflect new weightings,&rdquo; <a href="https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-stocks-russell/tech-healthcare-to-get-bumped-up-in-russell-index-remake-idUSKBN1JH32B">reports Reuters</a>.
<h3>What Happened</h3>
The iShares Russell 2000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwm#NYSE">IWM</a>), the largest small-cap ETF, tracks the aforementioned Russell 2000 Index. As of June 20, the technology and health care sectors combined for nearly <a href="https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239710/?referrer=tickerSearch">35 percent of IWM&#39;s weight</a>, representing two of the ETF&#39;s top three sector allocations.
That could change because small-cap health care and technology stocks have been primary drivers of this year&#39;s small-cap resurgence, one that has seen IWM gain about 12 percent.
<h3>Why It&#39;s Important</h3>
Stocks graduating from the Russell 2000 Index could find their way to the Russell 1000 Index, which is tracked by the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>). IWB is already heavy on technology and health care names with those sectors representing 25.61 percent and 13.38 percent, respectively, of the fund&#39;s weight.
The iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwd#NYSE">IWD</a>) devotes 14.51 percent of its weight to health care stocks and 9.25 percent to technology names.
As a growth ETF, it&#39;s not surprising the iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/iwf#NYSE">IWF</a>) has a substantial tech weight at 40.12 percent. IWF&#39;s health care allocation is 12.44 percent.
The additions and deletions can sometimes add volatility to these funds, as TD Ameritrade Chief Market Strategist JJ Kinahan noted.
&ldquo;You may see somewhat odd movement in ETFs like IWN; it would be similar to what you should&rsquo;ve been aware of on an options expiration or last week with the quadruple witch,&quot; he said. &quot;You have large amounts of orders coming in and out, so it wouldn&rsquo;t surprise me if there was some added volatility.&rdquo;
<h3>What&#39;s Next</h3>
The Russell reconstitution promises to bring increased volume Friday.
&ldquo;Last year&rsquo;s reconstitution is estimated to have resulted in total turnover of $50 billion,&rdquo; according to Reuters. Estimates for this year range from $54 billion to $62 billion in increased volume thanks to the Russell reconstitution.
IWB and the small-cap IWM have a combined $70.24 billion in assets under management.
Related Links:
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/18/06/11911289/a-new-blockchain-etf-focuses-on-china">A New Blockchain ETF For China.</a>
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/fintech/18/06/11904665/fintech-is-where-its-at-for-financial-etfs">A Fabulous FinTech ETF.</a>

Interview

Russell 1000 ETFs To Increase In Health Care, Tech Exposure

With the S&amp;P 500 off about 8 percent to start the year, advisors and investors may be left thinking that an early case of election year volatility is afoot. Conventional wisdom dictates that stocks can struggle in presidential election years and that those struggles can be more pronounced in open elections, or years in which an incumbent is not defending the White House. That is the case this year.
Investors&#39; treatment of exchange-traded funds to start 2016 indicates a desire for safe-haven assets. Five of this year&#39;s top 10 asset gathering funds are bond funds. Just three are equity ETFs, two of which are the Utilities SPDR (ETF) (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/xlu#NYSE">XLU</a>) and the iShares MSCI USA Minimum Volatility (iShares Trust (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/usmv#NYSE">USMV</a>)). Conversely, all of 10 of this year&#39;s worst ETFs in terms of lost assets are equity funds.
<bzrelatedlink>Related Link: <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/general/education/16/02/6216210/how-do-stock-markets-perform-during-a-presidential-election-year">How Do Stock Markets Perform During A Presidential Election Year?</a></bzrelatedlink>
<h3>Historical Performance Recap</h3>
There is some good news. According to a study by index provider <a href="http://ftse.com/">FTSE Russell</a>, the last year of presidential terms, particularly those of two-term presidents, of which President Obama is one, can be kind to stocks.
&ldquo;The Russell 1000 Index, reflecting US large cap stocks, and the Russell 2000 Index, reflecting US small cap stocks, have had positive returns in nearly every fourth year of a US presidential term since Ronald Reagan first took office in 1980. The only exceptions were in the midst of the global financial crisis in 2008 for the Russell 1000 Index and Russell 2000 Index (US large- and small-cap stocks, respectively) and in 1984 for the Russell 2000 Index (US small cap US stocks),&rdquo; according to the index provider. 
Investors can access those indexes via the iShares Russell 1000 Index (ETF) (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>) and the iShares Russell 2000 Index (ETF) (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwm#NYSE">IWM</a>), among other ETFs.
While 2008, the last year in President George W. Bush&#39;s second term, was brutal for stocks, the Russell 1000 and the Russell 2000 performed admirably during other presidential election years. In addition to 2008, the only other presidential election year included in the FTSE Russell in which the Russell 2000 closed lower was 1984. Since 1984, the only presidential election year in which the Russell 1000 finished lower was 2008.
&ldquo;Historical index analysis suggests that, while past performance is no guarantee of future results, US markets may get caught up in the optimism that an election brings, be it the promise of something new or the continuation of something good,&rdquo; said FTSE Russell senior index research analyst Mat Lystra.
Image Credit: <a href="https://pixabay.com/en/capitol-washington-dc-architecture-22546/">Public Domain</a>

Politics

Intraday Update

USMV

Election Year Might Not Be So Bad For Equity ETFs

Exchange traded products listed in the United States, including exchange traded funds, added just $2.4 billion in new assets last month, according to ETF research firm <a href="http://etfgi.com/news/detail/newsid/600">ETGI</a>.&nbsp;

	Still, net U.S. ETF inflows through the first eight months of the year were $127.5 billion and the U.S. ETF industry is now home to $2.03 trillion in combined assets under management, underscoring not only the industry&#39;s rapid growth, but investors&#39; growing preference for passively managed products.

	It is something to think about the next time a pundit says &ldquo;It&#39;s a stock picker&#39;s market,&rdquo; advice that endorses active investing, but the reality is 2015 is shaping up to be another year of mediocre performance for active managers. Data from <a href="http://us.spindices.com/">S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices&#39;</a> newly released U.S.&nbsp;S&amp;P Indices Versus Active Funds (SPIVA&reg;) Scorecard confirm as much.

	For the 12 months ended July 31, nearly two-thirds of active large-cap managers failed to beat their benchmark, according to S&amp;P Dow Jones Indices. The good news, sort of, for active managers and the investors that stick with this methodology is that the 65.3 percent failure rate of large-cap managers for the year ended July 31 is better than five- and 10-year laggard rates of 81 percent and 80 percent, respectively.

	Related Link: <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/15/09/5829553/proshares-adds-to-dividend-growth-lineup-with-europe-etf">ProShares Adds To Dividend Growth Lineup With Europe ETF</a>

	It is not a leap of faith to infer from that data that, most of the time, investors would be better with low-cost, passive index product, including index ETFs such as the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/spy#NYSE">SPY</a>), iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>) or the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/vti#NYSE">VTI</a>). In the case of the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF, that fund charges a scant 0.05 percent per year, or just $5 per $10,000 invested.

	Those thinking that inefficiencies found with small caps would lead to active management being the superior choice would be wrong. For the year ended July 31, 59 percent of active small-cap managers lagged the S&amp;P SmallCap 600. However, that is better than the five- and 10-year laggard rates, which averages 80 percent, according to S&amp;P data.

	&ldquo;It is commonly believed that active management works best in inefficient markets, such as small-cap or emerging markets. This argument is disputed by the findings of this SPIVA report. The majority of small-cap active managers consistently underperformed the benchmark in both the 10-year period and each rolling five-year period since 2002,&rdquo; said S&amp;P.

	The iShares Core S&amp;P Small-Cap ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ijr#NYSE">IJR</a>), which charges just 0.12 percent per year, has returned nearly 92 percent over the past five years.

	To be fair to active managers, there are some areas of strength, namely in the mid-cap space. For the 12 months ended July 31, just 48.2 percent of active mid-cap managers failed to beat the S&amp;P MidCap 400 Index. But, and there&#39;s always a &ldquo;but,&rdquo; 78 percent of active managers failed to beat the S&amp;P MidCap 400 over five years and 87 percent failed to beat that benchmark over 10 years, according to S&amp;P data.

	Perhaps that is why the iShares Core S&amp;P Mid-Cap ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ijh#NYSE">IJH</a>) and the SPDR S&amp;P MidCap 400 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/mdy#NYSE">MDY</a>) have $40 billion in combined assets under management.

	&ldquo;With the exception of emerging market equity funds, funds invested in global, international, and international small-cap equity categories fared better or at par with their respective benchmarks over a one-year period,&rdquo; adds S&amp;P. &ldquo;Over the 10-year horizon, managers across all international equity categories were outperformed by their benchmarks.&rdquo;

	Though there are some standouts among actively managed bond funds, <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/15/08/5764416/gundlachs-first-etf-is-a-smash-hit-tops-1-billion-in-assets">including some new ETFs</a>, fixed income is a veritable wasteland of slack performance by active managers. Over the past decade, 93 percent of managers running active long-term government bond funds lagged their benchmarks while just 7 percent of active junk bond managers beat their benchmarks, according to S&amp;P data.

Active Management Mediocrity Continues

Exchange traded funds that are weighted by constituents' market capitalization dominate the world of equity-based ETFs. These ETFs are easy to understand and, in many cases, cost effective.

	That does not mean cap-weighted ETFs always offer the best returns and investors have increasingly sought alternatives to traditional cap-weighted fare.

	Recent news from Invesco's (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ivz#NYSE">IVZ</a>) PowerShares, the fourth-largest U.S. ETF sponsor, that its suite of fundamentally-weighted ETFs back by Research Affiliates indices crossed <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/13/07/3738909/powershares-fundamental-etfs-top-5b-in-assets">$5 billion in assets under management</a> highlights the notion that investors are embracing new ways of thinking about ETFs.

	Fundamental ETFs come with some advantages, as S&amp;P Capital IQ points out.

	"Unlike a mutual fund where management only reveals part of its strategy, the rules for these ETFs are known to investors, offering transparency. Further the re-weightings are periodic, offering investors a lower cost alternative than a mutual fund as is described below. These ETFs allow investors to add exposure to stocks based on characteristics that appeal most to them, rather than hold the whole market," said S&amp;P Capital IQ in a new research note.

	The research firm has an Overweight rating on the nearly $2.2 billion PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1000 Portfolio (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/prf#NYSE">PRF</a>). PRF, which turns eight in December, tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Index. That index ranks stocks based on book value, cash flow, sales and dividends.

	PRF holds 1,018 stocks, not 1,000 has a direct competitor in the form of the iShares Russell 1000 ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>). One of the knocks on fundamentally-weighted ETFs is that they are pricier than their cap-weighted peers. PRF's annual expense ratio is 0.39 percent, not alarmingly higher, but still well above the 0.15 percent charged by IWB. That means an ETF such as PRF must consistently outperform its cheaper rivals to win the battle for investors' dollars.

	The data show PRF is winning. For the year-to-date period ending June 30, PRF's index was ahead of the Russell 1000 by nearly 300 basis points and over the past year, the margin was nearly 575 basis points, <a href="http://www.invescopowershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=PRF">according to PowerShares data</a>.

	PRF's top sector weights are 22.4 percent to financial services and almost 12 percent to energy. Top-10 holdings include Exxon Mobil (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/xom#NYSE">XOM</a>), Bank of America (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/bac#NYSE">BAC</a>) and Verizon (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/vz#NYSE">VZ</a>).

	S&amp;P Capital IQ also has an Overweight rating on the WisdomTree LargeCap Dividend Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/dln#NYSE">DLN</a>). Unlike some of its rivals that focus on <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/13/04/3526701/these-etfs-could-benefit-from-apple-dividend-growth">stocks' dividend increase streaks</a>, DLN's "index is dividend weighted annually to reflect the proportionate share of the aggregate cash dividends each component company is projected to pay in the coming year."

	There are times when DLN's methodology subjects investors to some lag relative to ETFs that focus on dividend increase streaks. For example, the SPDR S&amp;P Dividend ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/sdy#NYSE">SDY</a>), which only includes stocks that have raised dividends for 25 consecutive years, is outpacing DLN this year.

	However, over the past three years, DLN is ahead of SDY by 700 basis points. DLN is also slightly cheaper with an annual expense ratio of 0.28 percent compared to 0.35 percent for SDY.

	DLN is diverse at the sector level with six groups – staples, technology, financials, health care, energy and industrials – receiving weights ranging from 15.4 percent at the top to 10.8 percent. Top-10 holdings include Exxon, AT&amp;T (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/t#NYSE">T</a>) and Apple (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/aapl#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>).

	For more on ETFs, click <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/etfs">here</a>.

Dividends

Specialty ETFs

After-Hours Center

Analyst Ratings

PowerShares Exchange Traded Fund FTSE RAFI US 1000 Portfolio

S&P Bullish on 2 Fundamentally-Weighted ETFs

Invesco's (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ivz#NYSE">IVZ</a>) PowerShares, the fourth-largest U.S. ETF issuer, announced Tuesday the PowerShares Fundamental suite of ETFs recently passed the $5 billion assets under management, underscoring the rising popularity of ETFs that use alternative methodologies to weighting by market capitalization.

	"Invesco PowerShares has been focused on providing investors with the broadest and most diverse family of ‘smart beta' ETFs since the firm was founded," said Andrew Schlossberg, head of global ETFs. "Invesco PowerShares pioneered Fundamentals Weighted ETFs introducing the first broad-based US 1000 portfolio back in 2005, followed by international portfolios in 2007, and the first fixed-income portfolio in 2010."

	PowerShares lists fundamentally-weighted ETFs in the U.S., Canada and Europe. Those funds are based on the Research Affiliates Fundamental Index methodology that includes the use of book value, cash flow, sales and dividends, to select and weight index members.

	Alternative weighting methodologies have proven increasingly popular with investors with non-market cap-weighted ETFs accounting for 42 percent of inflows to equity-based ETFs through the first four months of this year, according to BlackRock.

	More importantly, some of the PowerShares RAFI ETFs have <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/13/05/3587943/two-top-ideas-among-fundamentally-weighted-etfs">outpaced their cap-weighted rivals</a>. For example, the PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1000 Portfolio (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/prf#NYSE">PRF</a>) is up 15.2 percent year-to-date compared to a 12.4 percent gain for the iShares Russell 1000 Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>). PRF, which debuted in late 2005, has over $2 billion in assets.

	The $646.7 million PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Portfolio (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/prfz#NASDAQ">PRFZ</a>) has outperformed assorted small- and mid-cap ETFs this year with a gain of 17.3 percent. PRF and PRFZ are considered the flagship funds in the PowerShares RAFI suite.

	PRF and PRFZ "have established five-year and since inception track records that demonstrated their effectiveness over varying market cycles. We believe the PowerShares Fundamental ETFs provide investors an important alternative to passive cap-weighted strategies, and also represent great value compared to actively managed portfolios when relative performance and fees are considered," said John Feyerer, head of product strategy &amp; research at Invesco PowerShares, in a statement.

	Other popular ETFs in the suite include the PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/pxh#NYSE">PXH</a>), which has nearly $323 million in AUM, and the PowerShares FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Portfolio (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/pxf#NYSE">PXF</a>). PXF has $543.3 million in AUM.

	For more on ETFs, click <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/etfs">here</a>.

PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1500 Small-Mid Portfolio

PRFZ

PowerShares FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-US Portfolio

PowerShares Exchange-Traded Fund Trust II PowerShares FTSE RAFI Emerging Markets Portfolio

PowerShares Fundamental ETFs Top $5B in Assets

Through the first four months of 2013, global exchange traded products inflows totaled $79 billion with a fair amount of that total going to traditional, market capitalization-weighted products. However, alternative weighting methodologies are gaining traction with investors.

	Non-Market Cap weighted funds have captured 42 percent of Equity ETP flows YTD, more than two times their share of Equity assets. Key drivers in this category are Dividend Income with flows of $3.4bn in April - a new record monthly high - and $10.9bn YTD as well as Minimum Volatility with $2.5bn in April and $6.5bn YTD, <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/markets/bonds/13/05/3553630/bond-etf-inflows-surge-in-april#ixzz2TEMZb4NB">according to BlackRock</a>.

	Prying investors, both professionals and retail, away from cap-weighted ETFs can be tricky business. That much is proven by the fact that at this point, <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/analyst-ratings/analyst-color/13/04/3543131/equal-weight-etf-trounces-traditional-s-p-500-peers">it is widely known that the</a> Guggenheim S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/rsp#NYSE">RSP</a>) has easily outpaced the SPDR S&amp;P 500 (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/spy#NYSE">SPY</a>) over long time horizons. Yet, SPY has $139.6 billion in assets under management compared to $3.91 billion for RSP.

	However, RSP merely stands as one example of a non-cap weighted ETF. There are others that use more intricate, fundamental weighting methodologies that have recently delivered solid returns. Here are some of the top ideas from the world of fundamentally-weighted ETFs.

	PowerShares FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Portfolio (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/pxf#NYSE">PXF</a>) 
	The PowerShares FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Portfolio is not quite a Japan ETF, but with Japanese stocks soaring this year, this ETF offers a nice advantage with a 22.4 percent weight to the world's third-largest economy.

	That is the good news. The potentially bad news is PXF, which has $543.7 million in AUM, has significant eurozone exposure through a combined 27 percent allocation to France, Germany, Italy and Spain. Perhaps another selling point with PXF is that the ETF offers exposure to <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/markets/bonds/13/02/3326834/mixed-etf-performances-for-some-aaa-rated-countries">four AAA-rated countries</a> those being Germany, Canada, Australia and Switzerland.

	PXF tracks the FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Index, which selects constituents based on book value, cash flow, sales and dividends. Stocks are then weighted by their fundamental scores and the result is a top-10 lineup that includes BP (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/bp#NYSE">BP</a>), Royal Dutch Shell (NYSE: RDS-A) and Vodafone (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/vod#NYSE">VOD</a>). BP is the ETF's largest holding with an allocation of just 1.91 percent. PXF, which has an annual expense ratio of 0.45 percent, is up 8.8 percent year-to-date.

	PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1000 Portfolio (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/prf#NYSE">PRF</a>) 
	The PowerShares FTSE RAFI US 1000 Portfolio competes with the cap-weighted iShares Russell 1000 Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>), a massive $7.6 billion ETF that has surged 15.5 percent year-to-date. That would imply challenging IWB is difficult. Well, PRF is no slouch with over $1.8 billion in AUM and a return of 17.3 percent this year.

	PRF tracks the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Index, which like the index tracked by PXF, weighs and scores constituents based on book value, cash flow, sales and dividends. That is an important factor for investors to consider because year-to-date, over the past year, the past three years and past five years, the FTSE RAFI US 1000 Index has outperformed the Russell 1000 and the S&amp;P 500, <a href="http://www.invescopowershares.com/products/overview.aspx?ticker=PRF">according to PowerShares data</a>.

	Eight of PRF's top-10 holdings are Dow components with Citigroup (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/c#NYSE">C</a>) and Wells Fargo (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/wfc#NYSE">WFC</a>) the outliers. Financial services is by far the largest sector weight at 21.5 percent, but energy, technology, staples, discretionary, industrials and health care all receive double-digit allocations. Exxon Mobil (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/xom#NYSE">XOM</a>), Bank of America (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/bac#NYSE">BAC</a>) and AT&amp;T (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/t#NYSE">T</a>) are the only stocks in PRF with weights above two percent. PRF has annual fees of 0.39 percent.

Rydex ETF Trust Rydex S&P Equal Weight ETF

Two Top Ideas Among Fundamentally-Weighted ETFs

Sector ETFs

Top 10 U.S. Large & All Cap Sector ETFs

So many exchange-traded products, so little time. With the number of ETFs and ETNs in the U.S. fast approaching 1,500, investors have a dizzying array of options, so it's not surprising that some indecision may creep into the selection process. 

For the indecisive among us, or for those that like the idea of owning multiple ETFs under one umbrella, an ETF fund of funds could prove to be a shrewd move. Also known as "multi-management," the fund of funds concept allows investors to have exposure to multiple asset classes under the tent of one fund. 

While this concept has proven desirable over time, many firms that sponsor ETF fund of funds don't actually advertise them as such, leaving investors to do some of the digging on their own. A good place to start is with <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/markets/bonds/12/04/2504891/4-asset-allocation-etfs-your-broker-forgot-to-mention-perm-pca">asset allocation ETFs, many of which are comprised of multiple ETFs</a>. With that, let's have a look at some of the more intriguing ETF fund of funds options on the market today.

iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iyld#NYSE">IYLD</a>)
Not even two months old, the iShares Morningstar Multi-Asset Income Index Fund is the epitome of an ETF fund of funds. The ETF features a small allocation to cash, but its other nine holdings are all other iShares products. 

The roster includes familiar funds such as the iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/hyg#NYSE">HYG</a>), the iShares Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/tlt#NYSE">TLT</a>), the iShares S&amp;P U.S. Preferred Stock Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/pff#NYSE">PFF</a>) and the iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/dvy#NYSE">DVY</a>). That quartet represents approximately 55% of IYLD's weight. 

IYLD has risen slightly since its early April debut and has raked in $22.8 million in assets under management. Income investors should note this fund will pay a monthly dividend.

SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/inkm#NYSE">INKM</a>)
Another new entrant to the ETF game, the SPDR SSgA Income Allocation ETF is one of State Street Global Advisor's new actively managed products and it should be noted that the actively managed space is another area where investors can find multiple ETF fund of funds.

Just over a month old, INKM is home to 18 holdings, 17 of which are other SPDR funds. As is the case with IYLD, the roster is chock full of ETFs many investors are already familiar with. The SPDR S&amp;P Dividend ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/sdy#NYSE">SDY</a>), SPDR Barclays Capital Long CorpTerm Bond ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/lwc#NYSE">LWC</a>) and the SPDR Barclays Capital High Yield Bond ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/jnk#NYSE">JNK</a>) account for over 43% of INKM's weight. 

Russell Equity ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/onef#NYSE">ONEF</a>)
One of the pioneers of the ETF fund of funds concept, the Russell Equity ETF is also one of the more unique and unbiased plays in this space. That is to say, ONEF is not loaded with other Russell funds. ONEF is home to 10 other ETFs, but only one, the Russell 1000 Low Volatility ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/lvol#NYSE">LVOL</a>), is a Russell fund. The other nine holdings are comprised of five Vanguard and four iShares funds with the iShares Russell 1000 Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>) commanding over 47% of ONEF's weight. The Vanguard MSCI EAFE ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/vea#NYSE">VEA</a>) receives an allocation of over 19%.

With an expense ratio of 0.51%, ONEF is cheaper than the iShares and SPDR offerings highlighted above.

AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Opportunities ETF (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/accu#NYSE">ACCU</a>)
Want an actively managed ETF fund of funds heavy on emerging markets? There's an ETF for that and that ETF is the AdvisorShares Accuvest Global Opportunities ETF. ACCU isn't 100% allocated to emerging markets ETFs as the iShares S&amp;P 500 Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ivv#NYSE">IVV</a>) currently accounts for 13.5% of the fund's weight.

ACCU's other five ETF holdings are sure to conjure up mixed emotions among emerging markets investors. The iShares FTSE China 25 Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/fxi#NYSE">FXI</a>) receives a weight of almost 20% and that's fine on the basis of potential Chinese economic stimulus and on the premise that investors will embrace Chinese stocks at some point because they're cheap. We also like an almost 23% allocation, the ETF's largest, to the iShares MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/thd#NYSE">THD</a>). 

What's holding ACCU back is a combined weight in excess of 26% to the iShares MSCI Brazil Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ewz#NYSE">EWZ</a>) and the iShares MSCI South Africa Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/eza#NYSE">EZA</a>), two emerging markets that have been punishing investors recently. The iShares MSCI South Korea Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ewy#NYSE">EWY</a>) is ACCU's other holding.

For more on asset allocation ETFs, please click <a href="http://www.benzinga.com/markets/bonds/12/04/2504891/4-asset-allocation-etfs-your-broker-forgot-to-mention-perm-pca">HERE</a>.

New ETFs

ACCU

iShares Dow Jones Select Dividend Index Fund

INKM

IYLD

LVOL

ONEF

iShares S&P US Preferred Stock Index Fund

iShares MSCI Thailand Investable Market Index Fund

iShares Trust Barclays 20+ Year Treasury Bond Fund

4 ETF Fund of Funds to Consider 

In the wake of news of Netflix's (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/nflx#NASDAQ">NFLX</a>) price increase, satellite TV providers DirecTV (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/dtv#NASDAQ">DTV</a>) and DISH Network (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/dish#NASDAQ">DISH</a>) reached new 52-week highs of $53.40 and $32.56 per share, respectively, in Wednesday's trading session.

DirecTV has an active share buyback program, and Brean Murray Carret recently initiated the stock with a Buy rating, due in part to DirecTV's expansion into Latin America. The company operates the largest direct broadcast satellite service in the U.S., serving 18 million U.S. customers and more than 6 million subscribers in Latin America. DirecTV has a market cap of $40.6 billion.

The return on equity is 172.2% and the long-term EPS growth forecast is 22.3%. It has a PEG ratio of 0.7, and the P/E ratio is less than the industry average. The stock has grown more than 32% since the beginning of the year, outperforming competitors Comcast (NASDAQ: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/cmcsa#NASDAQ">CMCSA</a>) and Time Warner Cable (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/twc#NYSE">TWC</a>), as well as the broader markets.

DISH Network is rumored to be interested in NCR's (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/ncr#NYSE">NCR</a>) entertainment business, which includes DVD-rental kiosks under the Blockbuster name. Englewood, Colorado-based DISH Network has a $6.5 billion market cap and is the nation's second largest provider of direct broadcast satellite TV service, serving about 14 million subscribers.

The company's return on equity is 371.5%. Its P/E ratio of 10.9 less than the industry average and that of rival DirectTV. Short interest has fallen from last fall to 1.8% of the float. The share price has increased more than 60% over the past year. In that time, the stock has outperformed DirecTV and the cable television industry average, as well as the broader markets.

Action Items:

Bullish:Traders looking for exchange traded funds that invest in DISH and DirecTV might want to consider the following trades:

<ul><li> iShares Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwf#NYSE">IWF</a>): +6.8% year to date</li>
<li>Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/vti#NYSE">VTI</a>): +5.4% year to date</li>
<li>iShares Russell 1000 Index Fund (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/iwb#NYSE">IWB</a>): +5.3% year to date</li></ul>

Bearish:Traders looking for a contrarian angle may want to consider these alternate positions:

<ul><li>ProShares UltraShort Russell1000 Growth (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/sfk#NYSE">SFK</a>)</li>
<li>ProShares UltraShort Consumer Services (NYSE: <a class="ticker" href="/stock/scc#NYSE">SCC</a>)</li></ul>

Neither Benzinga nor its staff recommend that you buy, sell, or hold any security. We do not offer investment advice, personalized or otherwise. Benzinga recommends that you conduct your own due diligence and consult a certified financial professional for personalized advice about your financial situation.

Pre-Market Outlook

CMCSA

DISH

iShares Trust Russell Midcap Growth Index Fund

iShares Trust Russell MidCap Value Index Fund

US Equities Fall as Economic Instability Continues

Small cap ETFs are generally made up of investments in companies with less than $1 billion in market capitalization. Small Cap Growth ETFs offer investors diversification throughout a wide range of industries and the potential for very high returns. At the same time, these ETFs tend to move up and down with the market and are subject to high levels of volatility.
US Small Cap Growth ETFs, represented by the iShares Russell 2000 Small Cap Growth Index ETF (IWO), continued to outperform other styles of US Equity Assets with a one week return of 2.66% and a trend score of 13.93%. The small cap growth sector has also outperformed other US Equity Assets over a 52 week period, returning 24.31% in the past year. (See Russell Table)
<h2>US Equity Style Return</h2>
<h3>4/29/2011</h3>
 
<table border="2">
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="12">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="left">Assets Class</th>
<th>Symbols</th>
<th>04/27 Trend Score</th>
<th>04/20 Trend Score</th>
<th>Direction</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Smallcap Growth</td>
<td>IWO</td>
<td>14.01%</td>
<td>13.06%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Midcap Growth</td>
<td>IWP</td>
<td>12.57%</td>
<td>11.91%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Smallcap Index</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>11.05%</td>
<td>9.92%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Midcap Indedx</td>
<td>IWR</td>
<td>10.9%</td>
<td>10.15%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Midcap Value</td>
<td>IWS</td>
<td>9.84%</td>
<td>9.03%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Largecap Growth</td>
<td>IWF</td>
<td>9.25%</td>
<td>8.24%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Smallcap Value</td>
<td>IWN</td>
<td>8.56%</td>
<td>7.26%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Largecap Index</td>
<td>IWB</td>
<td>8.52%</td>
<td>7.38%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Largecap Value</td>
<td>IWD</td>
<td>8.15%</td>
<td>6.96%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The trend score is defined as the average of 1,4,13,26 and 52 week total returns (including dividend reinvested).
<a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_toptablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed"> <img src="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_toptablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed" /> </a>
<a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_lowtablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed"> <img src="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_lowtablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed" /> </a>
 
<div id="smallCapGrowth" class="back">
<h2>U.S. Small Cap Growth</h2>
04/29/2011
<div class="dividerTop">
<table id="USSmallCapGrowth" class="tablesorter" border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2">
<thead>
<tr>
<th> Description </th>
<th> Symbol </th>
<th> 1 Yr </th>
<th> 3 Yr </th>
<th> 5 Yr </th>
<th> Avg. Volume(K) </th>
<th> 1 Yr Sharpe </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td>Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=VBK&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">VBK</a></td>
<td>27.33%</td>
<td>10.31%</td>
<td>6.52%</td>
<td>248</td>
<td>121.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>iShares Russell 2000 Growth In</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=IWO&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">IWO</a></td>
<td>26.68%</td>
<td>9.57%</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>1,679</td>
<td>119.24%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>iShares S&amp;P SmallCap 600 Growth</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=IJT&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">IJT</a></td>
<td>24.47%</td>
<td>8.6%</td>
<td>5.17%</td>
<td>187</td>
<td>121.82%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

Among US Small Cap Growth ETFs, the Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF (VBK) has shown the most strength, returning 27.33% in the past year. Others, including the iShares Russell 2000 Growth Index ETF (IWO) and the iShares S&amp;P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (UT) have also provided investors with returns higher than 24%.
In recent periods, equities have experienced high levels of growth, leading many to speculate that a retraction is inevitable. If equity markets begin to lose value, US Small Cap Growth ETFs will certainly be impacted, as the performance of these ETFs correlate with general market conditions. Still, investors should expect strong returns from ETFs in this sector for the foreseeable future.

Symbols: <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=VBK&amp;count=0032'>VBK</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWO&amp;count=0027'>IWO</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IJT&amp;count=0024'>IJT</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWO&amp;count=0027'>IWO</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWM&amp;count=00110'>IWM</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWR&amp;count=0032'>IWR</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWS&amp;count=0025'>IWS</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWF&amp;count=0013'>IWF</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWN&amp;count=0027'>IWN</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWB&amp;count=0011'>IWB</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWD&amp;count=0015'>IWD</a>
 
Tickers: (NYSE: VBK) (NYSE: IWO) (NYSE: IJT) (NYSE: IWO) (NYSE: IWP) (NYSE: IWM) (NYSE: IWR) (NYSE: IWS) (NYSE: IWF) (NYSE: IWN) (NYSE: IWB) (NYSE: IWD)
 
Disclosure: MyPlanIQ does not have any business relationship with the company or companies mentioned in this article. It does not set up their retirement plans. The performance data of portfolios mentioned above are obtained through historical simulation and are hypothetical.
</div>
</div>
 
					<a href = "http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_news.action?PID=3132">comments(0)</a>  
					<a class="a2a_dd" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://static.addtoany.com/buttons/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" border="0" alt="Share/Bookmark" /></a>

iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index Fund

US Small Cap Growth ETFs Continue Strong Gains

Large Cap Blend ETFs provide access to both growth and value stocks, looking for high returns while hedging that risk with more stable securities. Large Cap ETFs invest across the entire spectrum of the US market. Stocks in the top 70% of the capitalization of the US equity market are defined as large cap.
Despite strong returns, US Large Cap Blend ETFs, including the Russell Large Cap Index (IWB), have underperformed mid cap and small cap ETFs. With a one-year trend score of 8.52%, the Russell Large Cap Index falls towards the bottom of the US Style Return Table as seen below.
<h2>US Equity Style Return</h2>
<h3>4/29/2011</h3>
 
<table border="2">
</table>
<table border="0" cellspacing="12">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="left">Assets Class</th>
<th>Symbols</th>
<th>04/27 Trend Score</th>
<th>04/20 Trend Score</th>
<th>Direction</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Smallcap Growth</td>
<td>IWO</td>
<td>14.01%</td>
<td>13.06%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Midcap Growth</td>
<td>IWP</td>
<td>12.57%</td>
<td>11.91%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Smallcap Index</td>
<td>IWM</td>
<td>11.05%</td>
<td>9.92%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Midcap Indedx</td>
<td>IWR</td>
<td>10.9%</td>
<td>10.15%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Midcap Value</td>
<td>IWS</td>
<td>9.84%</td>
<td>9.03%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Largecap Growth</td>
<td>IWF</td>
<td>9.25%</td>
<td>8.24%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Smallcap Value</td>
<td>IWN</td>
<td>8.56%</td>
<td>7.26%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Largecap Index</td>
<td>IWB</td>
<td>8.52%</td>
<td>7.38%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Russell Largecap Value</td>
<td>IWD</td>
<td>8.15%</td>
<td>6.96%</td>
<td>^</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The trend score is defined as the average of 1,4,13,26 and 52 week total returns (including dividend reinvested).
<a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_toptablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed"> <img src="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_toptablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed" width='600' height='400' /> </a>
<a rel="lightbox" href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_lowtablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed"> <img src="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/article_lowtablechart.action?tableName=USStyleReturnTableWed" width='600' height='400' /> </a>
<h2>US Large Cap Blend</h2>
<h3>4/29/2011</h3>
<table id="USLargeCapBlend" class="tablesorter" border="1" cellspacing="1" cellpadding="2">
<thead>
<tr>
<th > Description </th>
<th > Symbol </th>
<th > 1 Yr </th>
<th > 3 Yr </th>
<th > 5 Yr </th>
<th > Avg. Volume(K) </th>
<th > 1 Yr Sharpe </th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr class="even">
<td>SPDR S&amp;P 500</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=SPY&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">SPY</a></td>
<td>15.13%</td>
<td>1.42%</td>
<td>2.64%</td>
<td>169,849</td>
<td>83.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>iShares S&amp;P 500 Index</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=IVV&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">IVV</a></td>
<td>14.66%</td>
<td>2.18%</td>
<td>2.45%</td>
<td>2,992</td>
<td>79.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Vanguard Total Stock Market</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=VTI&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">VTI</a></td>
<td>17.54%</td>
<td>3.35%</td>
<td>3.48%</td>
<td>1,833</td>
<td>92.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>iShares Russell 1000</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=IWB&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">IWB</a></td>
<td>15.83%</td>
<td>2.66%</td>
<td>2.84%</td>
<td>886</td>
<td>86.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Rydex S&amp;P Equal Weight</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=RSP&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">RSP</a></td>
<td>18.18%</td>
<td>5.79%</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>1,115</td>
<td>94.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>iShares S&amp;P 100</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=OEF&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">OEF</a></td>
<td>12.47%</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>2.15%</td>
<td>883</td>
<td>67.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Vanguard Large Cap</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=VV&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">VV</a></td>
<td>15.8%</td>
<td>2.78%</td>
<td>3.54%</td>
<td>223</td>
<td>85.55%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="odd">
<td>Schwab U.S. Large Cap</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=SCHX&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">SCHX</a></td>
<td>15.95%</td>
<td>NA</td>
<td>NA</td>
<td>297</td>
<td>87.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr class="even">
<td>Vanguard S&amp;P 500</td>
<td><a href="http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/jsp/fundcenter/View.action?symbol=VOO&amp;type=1&amp;includeHeader=true" target="_blank">VOO</a></td>
<td>NA</td>
<td>NA</td>
<td>NA</td>
<td>311</td>
<td>NA</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
 
Among US Large Cap Blend ETFs the Ryder S&amp;P Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) have performed the strongest, offering one-year returns of 18.18% and 17.54% respectively. The ETF in the sector with the highest level of average volume, the SPDR S&amp;P 500 Index, returned 15.13% in the past year, near the middle of the pack.
While US Large Cap Blend ETFs have provided investors with strong returns in recent periods, many in the market believe that the sector is due for a retraction based on overheated valuations. For the time being, investors will likely find better returns elsewhere.
Symbols: <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=SPY&amp;count=00149'>SPY</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IVV&amp;count=0054'>IVV</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=VTI&amp;count=00113'>VTI</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWB&amp;count=008'>IWB</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=RSP&amp;count=0050'>RSP</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=OEF&amp;count=004'>OEF</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=VV&amp;count=0046'>VV</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=SCHX&amp;count=0046'>SCHX</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=VOO&amp;count=001'>VOO</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWO&amp;count=0024'>IWO</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWP&amp;count=0020'>IWP</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWM&amp;count=00108'>IWM</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWR&amp;count=0030'>IWR</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWS&amp;count=0023'>IWS</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWF&amp;count=0011'>IWF</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWN&amp;count=0025'>IWN</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWB&amp;count=008'>IWB</a>, <a href ='http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_symbols.action?symbol=IWD&amp;count=0013'>IWD</a>
 Tickers: (NYSE: SPY) (NYSE: IVV) (NYSE: VTI) (NYSE: IWB)(NYSE: RSP)(NYSE: OEF)(NYSE: VV)(NYSE: SCHX)(NYSE: VOO) (NYSE: IWO) (NYSE: IWP) (NYSE: IWM) (NYSE: IWR) (NYSE: IWS) (NYSE: IWF) (NYSE: IWN) (NYSE: IWB) (NYSE: IWD)
 
Disclosure: MyPlanIQ does not have any business relationship with the company or companies mentioned in this article. It does not set up their retirement plans. The performance data of portfolios mentioned above are obtained through historical simulation and are hypothetical.
 
					<a href = "http://www.myplaniq.com/LTISystem/f401k_news.action?PID=3131">comments(0)</a>  
					<a class="a2a_dd" href="http://www.addtoany.com/share_save"><img src="http://static.addtoany.com/buttons/share_save_171_16.png" width="171" height="16" border="0" alt="Share/Bookmark" /></a>

SCHX

US Large Cap Blend ETFs Return Can Be Beaten As Equity Markets Continue Ascent

Is OMFL's Approach Really A Game Changer? Conviction Without Certainty

The Myth Of Small-Cap Outperformance

VFLO: Reconstitution Update, New Factor Mix For This Growing FCF Yield ETF

Broad market ETFs remain below 50-day moving averages, despite last week's uptick

Ignore the "Sell in May and Walk Away" fear-mongering myth. The fifth month of the year provides investors with abundant information on two fronts:...