HMBL & OKTA Class Action Deadlines: Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC, A Top Class Action Firm, Reminds Investors to Contact the Firm and Actively Participate

NEW YORK, July 13, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Attorney Advertising -- Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC reminds investors that a class action lawsuit has been filed against the following publicly-traded companies. You can review a copy of the Complaints by visiting the links below or you may contact Peretz Bronstein, Esq. or his Law Clerk and Client Relations Manager, Yael Nathanson of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC at 212-697-6484. If you suffered a loss, you can request that the Court appoint you as lead plaintiff.  Your ability to share in any recovery doesn't require that you serve as a lead plaintiff. A lead plaintiff acts on behalf of all other class members in directing the litigation. The lead plaintiff can select a law firm of its choice. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. 

HUMBL, Inc. HMBL
Class Period: HUMBL common stock and/or the unregistered HUMBL BLOCK Exchange Traded Index ("ETX") securities between November 21, 2020 and the filing of this action
Deadline: July 19, 2022
For more info: www.bgandg.com/hmbl.                 
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business and operations. Specifically, defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose (1) that the HUMBL Pay App did not have even the basic functionality that it promised investors; and (2) that several of its hyped international business partnerships had a very low chance of contributing material revenues to the Company's bottom line.

Okta, Inc. OKTA 
Class Period: March 5, 2021 - May 22, 2022,
Deadline: July 19, 2022
For more info: www.bgandg.com/okta.
The Complaint alleges that throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's business, operations, and compliance policies. Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the Company had inadequate cybersecurity controls; (ii) as a result, the Company's systems were vulnerable to data breaches; (iii) the Company ultimately did experience a data breach caused by a hacking group, which potentially affected hundreds of the Company customers; (iv) the Company initially did not disclose and subsequently downplayed the severity of the data breach; (v) all the foregoing, once revealed, was likely to have a material negative impact on the Company's business, financial condition, and reputation; and (vi) as a result, the Company's public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.

Contact:
Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman, LLC
Peretz Bronstein or Yael Nathanson
212-697-6484 | info@bgandg.com