AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (ARCA: EATZ)

Latest News for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (ARCA:EATZ)

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF

Cardano's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/ada/usd">ADA</a>) price has increased 3.25% over the past 24 hours to $0.47, which is in the opposite direction of its trend over the past week, where it has experienced a 16.0% loss, moving from $0.56 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $3.09. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Cardano over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538947_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
Cardano's trading volume has climbed 44.0% over the past week along with the circulating supply of the coin, which has increased 0.52%. This brings the circulating supply to 35.30 billion, which makes up an estimated 78.45% of its max supply of 45.00 billion. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for ADA is #11 at $16.75 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538947_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Markets

Movers

Trading Ideas

$ADA

Cardano Up More Than 3% In 24 hours

Benchmark analyst Mike Hickey reiterates Take-Two Interactive (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TTWO#NASDAQ">TTWO</a>) with a Buy and maintains $200 price target.

News

Price Target

Reiteration

Analyst Ratings

TTWO

Benchmark Reiterates Buy on Take-Two Interactive, Maintains $200 Price Target

Across the recent three months, 6 analysts have shared their insights on Host Hotels &amp; Resorts (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HST#NASDAQ">HST</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Providing deeper insights, analysts have established 12-month price targets, indicating an average target of $22.67, along with a high estimate of $25.00 and a low estimate of $20.00. Observing a 7.95% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $21.00. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538936_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Host Hotels &amp; Resorts is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Robin Farley</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dori Kesten</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>William Crow</td>
<td>Raymond James</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Powell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Patrick Scholes</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Simon Yarmak</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Host Hotels &amp; Resorts. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Host Hotels &amp; Resorts compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/HST/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Host Hotels &amp; Resorts analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's Background</h2>
Host Hotels &amp; Resorts owns 77 predominantly urban and resort upper-upscale and luxury hotel properties representing nearly 42,000 rooms, mainly in the United States. Host recently sold off the company's interests in a joint venture owning a portfolio of hotels throughout Europe and also sold other joint ventures that owned properties in Asia and the United States. The majority of Host's portfolio operates under the Marriott and Starwood brands.
<h3>Financial Insights: Host Hotels &amp; Resorts</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is above the industry average, indicating that it is relatively larger in size compared to peers. This may suggest a higher level of investor confidence and market recognition.
Revenue Growth: Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 31 December, 2023, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 4.75%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Real Estate sector, the company excelled with a growth rate higher than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 9.98%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 1.96%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 1.08%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Host Hotels &amp; Resorts's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.72, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Analysts are specialists within banking and financial systems that typically report for specific stocks or within defined sectors. These people research company financial statements, sit in conference calls and meetings, and speak with relevant insiders to determine what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts will rate each stock once a quarter. 
Beyond their standard evaluations, some analysts contribute predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, furnishing investors with additional guidance. Users of analyst ratings should be mindful that this specialized advice is shaped by human perspectives and may be subject to variability.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

A Glimpse Into The Expert Outlook On Host Hotels & Resorts Through 6 Analysts

In the latest quarter, 8 analysts provided ratings for Choice Hotels Intl (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CHH#NYSE">CHH</a>), showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $131.12, a high estimate of $156.00, and a low estimate of $114.00. Surpassing the previous average price target of $120.43, the current average has increased by 8.88%.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538922_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
The standing of Choice Hotels Intl among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Powell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$114.00</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Patrick Scholes</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$146.00</td>
<td>$142.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Bellisario</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$138.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Powell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
<td>$119.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Katz</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$156.00</td>
<td>$96.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandt Montour</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$119.00</td>
<td>$114.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandt Montour</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Underweight</td>
<td>$114.00</td>
<td>$112.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Bellisario</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$138.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Choice Hotels Intl. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Choice Hotels Intl compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts provide insights into price targets, offering estimates for the future value of Choice Hotels Intl's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Choice Hotels Intl's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CHH/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Choice Hotels Intl analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Choice Hotels Intl</h2>
As of Dec. 31, 2023, Choice Hotels operated 633,000 rooms across 15 brands addressing the economy and midscale segments. Comfort Inn and Comfort Suites are the largest brands (27% of the company's total domestic rooms), while Ascend and Cambria (7% of total domestic rooms) are newer lifestyle and select-service brands. Choice closed on its Radisson acquisition in August 2022, which added around 70,000 rooms. Franchises account for 100% of total revenue, and the United States represent 79% of total rooms in 2023.
<h3>Financial Insights: Choice Hotels Intl</h3>
Market Capitalization Perspectives: The company's market capitalization falls below industry averages, signaling a relatively smaller size compared to peers. This positioning may be influenced by factors such as perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Decline in Revenue: Over the 3 months period, Choice Hotels Intl faced challenges, resulting in a decline of approximately -0.99% in revenue growth as of 31 December, 2023. This signifies a reduction in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Choice Hotels Intl's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 8.04% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): Choice Hotels Intl's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 53.34%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Choice Hotels Intl's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 1.25%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Choice Hotels Intl's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 47.24, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings For Choice Hotels Intl

In the last three months, 8 analysts have published ratings on PENN Entertainment (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PENN#NASDAQ">PENN</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated PENN Entertainment and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $26.12, accompanied by a high estimate of $33.00 and a low estimate of $21.00. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 5.26%. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538906_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive PENN Entertainment. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Felicia Hendrix</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dara Mohsenian</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Chaiken</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dara Mohsenian</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steven Wieczynski</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Barry Jonas</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chad Beynon</td>
<td>Macquarie</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bernie McTernan</td>
<td>Needham</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to PENN Entertainment. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of PENN Entertainment compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of PENN Entertainment's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of PENN Entertainment's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PENN/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on PENN Entertainment analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Discovering PENN Entertainment: A Closer Look</h2>
Penn Entertainment's origins date back to its 1972 racetrack opening in Pennsylvania. Today, Penn operates 43 properties across 20 states and 12 brands (such as Hollywood Casino and Ameristar), with land-based casinos representing 89% of total sales in 2023 (11% was from the interactive segment, which includes sports, iGaming, and media revenue). The retail portfolio generates mid-30% EBITDAR margins and helps position the company to obtain licenses for the digital wagering markets. Additionally, Penn's media assets, theScore and ESPN (starting with its partnership launch Nov. 14, 2023), provide access to sports betting/iGaming technology and clientele, helping it form a leading digital position.
<h3>Breaking Down PENN Entertainment's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining PENN Entertainment's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a decline of approximately -12.0% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: PENN Entertainment's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of -25.66%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): PENN Entertainment's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -10.71%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): PENN Entertainment's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -2.22%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.
Debt Management: PENN Entertainment's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 3.6, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PENN

Where PENN Entertainment Stands With Analysts

Barclays analyst Dan Levy maintains Rivian Automotive (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RIVN#NASDAQ">RIVN</a>) with a Equal-Weight and lowers the price target from $12 to $10.

RIVN

Barclays Maintains Equal-Weight on Rivian Automotive, Lowers Price Target to $10

Crown Castle (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CCI#NYSE">CCI</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 2.08% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 9.73%. Currently, Crown Castle has a market capitalization of $41.54 billion. 
Buying $100 In CCI: If an investor had bought $100 of CCI stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $622.08 today based on a price of $95.49 for CCI at the time of writing.
<h3>Crown Castle's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538892_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much $100 Invested In Crown Castle 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

Ratings for First Finl Bankshares (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FFIN#NASDAQ">FFIN</a>) were provided by 5 analysts in the past three months, showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Providing deeper insights, analysts have established 12-month price targets, indicating an average target of $32.6, along with a high estimate of $35.00 and a low estimate of $31.00. Observing a 1.24% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $32.20. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538891_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Analyzing Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Breakdown</h2>
The standing of First Finl Bankshares among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Matt Olney</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandon King</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jennifer Demba</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matt Olney</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brady Gailey</td>
<td>Keefe, Bruyette &amp; Woods</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to First Finl Bankshares. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering a comprehensive view, analysts assess stocks qualitatively, spanning from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of First Finl Bankshares compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for First Finl Bankshares's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
To gain a panoramic view of First Finl Bankshares's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FFIN/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on First Finl Bankshares analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>About First Finl Bankshares</h2>
First Financial Bankshares Inc is a financial and bank holding company. The company operates one line of business (community banking) located in a single geographic area (Texas). The company conducts a full-service commercial banking business through its subsidiaries. The loan portfolio segments of the company include Commercial and Industrial, Municipal, Agricultural, Construction and Development, Farm, Non-Owner Occupied and Owner Occupied Commercial Real Estate, Residential, Consumer Auto and Consumer Non-Auto.
<h3>Key Indicators: First Finl Bankshares's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining First Finl Bankshares's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a decline of approximately -10.22% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Financials sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: First Finl Bankshares's net margin excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 39.61%. This signifies efficient cost management and strong financial health.
Return on Equity (ROE): First Finl Bankshares's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 3.36%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): First Finl Bankshares's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 0.36%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: The company maintains a balanced debt approach with a debt-to-equity ratio below industry norms, standing at 0.01.
<h2>The Basics of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Experts in banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their comprehensive research involves attending company conference calls and meetings, analyzing financial statements, and engaging with insiders to generate what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

FFIN

The Analyst Verdict: First Finl Bankshares In The Eyes Of 5 Experts

Best Buy Co (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BBY#NYSE">BBY</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 1.93% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 12.19%. Currently, Best Buy Co has a market capitalization of $16.46 billion. 
Buying $100 In BBY: If an investor had bought $100 of BBY stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $314.87 today based on a price of $76.42 for BBY at the time of writing.
<h3>Best Buy Co's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538887_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Best Buy Co Stock In The Last 10 Years

Toncoin's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/">TON</a>) price has increased 3.2% over the past 24 hours to $6.42, which is in the opposite direction of its trend over the past week, where it has experienced a 9.0% loss, moving from $7.04 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $7.63. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Toncoin over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538876_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has climbed 157.0% over the past week, moving opposite, directionally, with the overall circulating supply of the coin, which has decreased 0.76%. This brings the circulating supply to 3.47 billion. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for TON is #9 at $22.32 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538876_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$TON

Toncoin Up More Than 3% In 24 hours

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully assess companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating ON Semiconductor (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ON#NASDAQ">ON</a>) against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>ON Semiconductor Background</h3>
Onsemi is a supplier of power semiconductors and sensors focused on the automotive and industrial markets. Onsemi is the second-largest power chipmaker in the world and the largest supplier of image sensors to the automotive market. While the firm used to be highly vertically integrated, it now pursues a hybrid manufacturing strategy for flexible capacity. Onsemi is pivoting to focus on emerging applications like electric vehicles, autonomous vehicles, industrial automation, and renewable energy.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>12.87</td>
<td>3.48</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>7.37%</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>$0.94</td>
<td>-4.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>70.97</td>
<td>49.25</td>
<td>34.66</td>
<td>32.23%</td>
<td>$14.56</td>
<td>$16.79</td>
<td>265.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>46.79</td>
<td>8.30</td>
<td>14.14</td>
<td>2.81%</td>
<td>$4.61</td>
<td>$7.38</td>
<td>34.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>292.63</td>
<td>4.48</td>
<td>11.11</td>
<td>1.2%</td>
<td>$1.22</td>
<td>$2.91</td>
<td>10.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>23.03</td>
<td>7.81</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>12.4%</td>
<td>$3.58</td>
<td>$5.62</td>
<td>4.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intel Corp</td>
<td>87.60</td>
<td>1.41</td>
<td>2.72</td>
<td>2.57%</td>
<td>$5.57</td>
<td>$7.05</td>
<td>9.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>23.14</td>
<td>8.81</td>
<td>8.56</td>
<td>8.14%</td>
<td>$1.98</td>
<td>$2.43</td>
<td>-12.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>1269</td>
<td>21.56</td>
<td>36.71</td>
<td>1.78%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>13.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>33.49</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>8.15</td>
<td>1.3%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>-22.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>19.68</td>
<td>6.43</td>
<td>5.42</td>
<td>5.97%</td>
<td>$0.75</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>-18.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>8.88</td>
<td>2.13</td>
<td>2.16</td>
<td>6.69%</td>
<td>$1.5</td>
<td>$1.95</td>
<td>-3.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>70.75</td>
<td>14.71</td>
<td>16.60</td>
<td>4.85%</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>$0.25</td>
<td>-1.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc</td>
<td>25.63</td>
<td>2.34</td>
<td>3.53</td>
<td>2.53%</td>
<td>$0.73</td>
<td>$0.53</td>
<td>0.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>20.94</td>
<td>2.47</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>4.45%</td>
<td>$29.8</td>
<td>$25.76</td>
<td>-9.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.14</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>2.78</td>
<td>3.72%</td>
<td>$25.78</td>
<td>$17.81</td>
<td>-3.7%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>22.52</td>
<td>2.79</td>
<td>5.64</td>
<td>5.38%</td>
<td>$0.47</td>
<td>$0.5</td>
<td>15.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>17.31</td>
<td>2.51</td>
<td>3.37</td>
<td>3.76%</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>-9.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>37.14</td>
<td>13.65</td>
<td>13.03</td>
<td>14.98%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>-3.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>36.09</td>
<td>5.01</td>
<td>12.64</td>
<td>4.36%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>-6.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>91.51</td>
<td>6.70</td>
<td>10.91</td>
<td>1.27%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-12.75%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rambus Inc</td>
<td>18.77</td>
<td>5.91</td>
<td>13.59</td>
<td>5.87%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-0.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>111.3</td>
<td>8.53</td>
<td>10.6</td>
<td>6.31%</td>
<td>$4.63</td>
<td>$4.67</td>
<td>12.51%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon analyzing ON Semiconductor, the following trends can be observed: 
<ul>
<li>
The stock's Price to Earnings ratio of 12.87 is lower than the industry average by 0.12x, suggesting potential value in the eyes of market participants.
</li>
<li>
The current Price to Book ratio of 3.48, which is 0.41x the industry average, is substantially lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively low Price to Sales ratio of 3.41, which is 0.32x the industry average, the stock might be considered undervalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 7.37% that is 1.06% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $790 Million, which is 0.17x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
With lower gross profit of $940 Million, which indicates 0.2x below the industry average, the company may experience lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of -4.06% is significantly below the industry average of 12.51%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538856_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between ON Semiconductor and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, ON Semiconductor has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.43.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For ON Semiconductor, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all low compared to industry peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high ROE suggests efficient use of shareholder funds, while low EBITDA and gross profit may indicate room for improvement in operational efficiency. Additionally, the low revenue growth implies a slower expansion rate compared to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating ON Semiconductor And Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Aimee Katz, 10% Owner at Zurn Elkay Water (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZWS#NYSE">ZWS</a>), disclosed an insider sell on April 18, according to a recent SEC filing.
What Happened: Katz's decision to sell 250,000 shares of Zurn Elkay Water was revealed in a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001439288/000110465924048876//Archives/edgar/data/1439288/000110465924048876/0001104659-24-048876-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday. The total value of the sale is $8,019,414.
The latest market snapshot at Friday morning reveals Zurn Elkay Water shares down by 1.55%, trading at $31.12.
<h3>All You Need to Know About Zurn Elkay Water</h3>
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp designs procure, manufactures, and markets a range of clean water solutions for drinking water, hygiene, and sustainable water management. The Zurn Elkay product portfolio includes professional-grade water control and safety, water distribution and drainage, drinking water, finish plumbing, hygienic, environmental and site works products for public and private spaces.
<h3>Zurn Elkay Water's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Revenue Growth: Zurn Elkay Water displayed positive results in 3 months. As of 31 December, 2023, the company achieved a solid revenue growth rate of approximately 4.85%. This indicates a notable increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Evaluating Earnings Performance:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company excels with a remarkable gross margin of 43.69%, indicating superior cost efficiency and profitability compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Zurn Elkay Water's EPS is below the industry average, signaling challenges in bottom-line performance with a current EPS of 0.08.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: Zurn Elkay Water's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.34, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
Exploring Valuation Metrics Landscape:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: Zurn Elkay Water's stock is currently priced at a premium level, as reflected in the higher-than-average P/E ratio of 53.58.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: A higher-than-average P/S ratio of 3.66 suggests overvaluation in the eyes of investors, considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Boasting an EV/EBITDA ratio of 21.52, Zurn Elkay Water demonstrates a robust market valuation, outperforming industry benchmarks.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Reflecting a smaller scale, the company's market capitalization is positioned below industry averages. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Unmasking the Significance of Insider Transactions</h3>
Insightful as they may be, insider transactions should be considered alongside a thorough examination of other investment criteria.
Within the legal framework, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities as per Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are mandated to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
The initiation of a new purchase by a company insider serves as a strong indication that they expect the stock to rise.
However, insider sells may not always signal a bearish view and can be influenced by various factors.
<h3>Cracking Transaction Codes</h3>
When it comes to transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> tend to focus on those in the open market, detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S indicates a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001439288">Check Out The Full List Of Zurn Elkay Water's Insider Trades.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Insider Trades

10% Owner Of Zurn Elkay Water Makes $8.02M Sale

Across the recent three months, 4 analysts have shared their insights on ManpowerGroup (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MAN#NYSE">MAN</a>), expressing a variety of opinions spanning from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for ManpowerGroup, presenting an average target of $81.75, a high estimate of $85.00, and a low estimate of $78.00. This upward trend is evident, with the current average reflecting a 0.93% increase from the previous average price target of $81.00.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538848_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of ManpowerGroup by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Joshua Chan</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$80.00</td>
<td>$81.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Steinerman</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$84.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Silber</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
<td>$86.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tobey Sommer</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$78.00</td>
<td>$75.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to ManpowerGroup. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of ManpowerGroup compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for ManpowerGroup's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of ManpowerGroup's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/MAN/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on ManpowerGroup analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind ManpowerGroup</h2>
ManpowerGroup Inc. is engaged in providing workforce solutions and services. The company provides services that includes Recruitment and Assessment, Upskilling, Reskilling, Training and Development, Career Management, Outsourcing, and Workforce Consulting. The reportable segments of the company are Staffing and Interim, Outcome-Based Solutions and Consulting, Permanent Recruitment, and Others. The Staffing and Interim segment derives maximum of the company's revenue. The company derives maximum geographical revenue from Southern European region.
<h3>ManpowerGroup's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Market Capitalization: Indicating a reduced size compared to industry averages, the company's market capitalization poses unique challenges.
Negative Revenue Trend: Examining ManpowerGroup's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a decline of approximately -3.72% in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company encountered difficulties, with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Net Margin: ManpowerGroup's net margin is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of -1.82%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): The company's ROE is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of -3.65%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): ManpowerGroup's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -0.97%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 0.6, ManpowerGroup adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Assessing ManpowerGroup: Insights From 4 Financial Analysts

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Coinbase Glb (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/COIN#NASDAQ">COIN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Capital Markets industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Coinbase Glb Background</h3>
Founded in 2012, Coinbase is the leading cryptocurrency exchange platform in the United States. The company intends to be the safe and regulation-compliant point of entry for retail investors and institutions into the cryptocurrency economy. Users can establish an account directly with the firm, instead of using an intermediary, and many choose to allow Coinbase to act as a custodian for their cryptocurrency, giving the company breadth beyond that of a traditional financial exchange. While the company still generates the majority of its revenue from transaction fees charged to its retail customers, Coinbase uses internal investment and acquisitions to expand into adjacent businesses, such as prime brokerage and data analytics.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Coinbase Global Inc</td>
<td>589.32</td>
<td>8.41</td>
<td>17.85</td>
<td>4.48%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.83</td>
<td>51.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>S&amp;P Global Inc</td>
<td>50.23</td>
<td>3.87</td>
<td>10.55</td>
<td>1.66%</td>
<td>$1.16</td>
<td>$2.12</td>
<td>7.32%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CME Group Inc</td>
<td>23.66</td>
<td>2.82</td>
<td>13.51</td>
<td>2.93%</td>
<td>$1.13</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>19.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Intercontinental Exchange Inc</td>
<td>31.26</td>
<td>2.92</td>
<td>7.47</td>
<td>1.46%</td>
<td>$1.15</td>
<td>$1.5</td>
<td>12.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nasdaq Inc</td>
<td>28.88</td>
<td>3.20</td>
<td>5.04</td>
<td>2.28%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>4.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tradeweb Markets Inc</td>
<td>59.06</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>16.05</td>
<td>1.68%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.24</td>
<td>26.26%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FactSet Research Systems Inc</td>
<td>33.98</td>
<td>9.09</td>
<td>7.73</td>
<td>8.05%</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Morningstar Inc</td>
<td>88.82</td>
<td>9.41</td>
<td>6.15</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>13.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MarketAxess Holdings Inc</td>
<td>29.66</td>
<td>5.95</td>
<td>10.16</td>
<td>5.61%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>10.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Donnelley Financial Solutions Inc</td>
<td>22.94</td>
<td>4.52</td>
<td>2.37</td>
<td>2.69%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>5.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Open Lending Corp</td>
<td>25.72</td>
<td>2.68</td>
<td>4.79</td>
<td>-2.3%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-44.3%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Value Line Inc</td>
<td>19.08</td>
<td>3.91</td>
<td>9.14</td>
<td>6.73%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-8.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>37.57</td>
<td>4.76</td>
<td>8.45</td>
<td>3.32%</td>
<td>$0.42</td>
<td>$0.61</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Coinbase Glb, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The current Price to Earnings ratio of 589.32 is 15.69x higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 8.41 relative to the industry average by 1.77x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 17.85, surpassing the industry average by 2.11x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 4.48%, which is 1.16% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $180 Million, which is 0.43x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $830 Million, which indicates 1.36x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
With a revenue growth of 51.61%, which surpasses the industry average of 4.71%, the company is demonstrating robust sales expansion and gaining market share.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538846_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Coinbase Glb and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
When considering the debt-to-equity ratio, Coinbase Glb exhibits a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company has a favorable balance between debt and equity, with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.48, which can be perceived as a positive aspect by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Coinbase Glb, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to industry peers, indicating potentially overvalued stock. On the other hand, the high ROE, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong financial performance and growth potential, despite the low EBITDA. In the Capital Markets industry, Coinbase Glb stands out for its robust profitability and revenue growth, although its stock valuation may be a concern.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

COIN

Insights Into Coinbase Glb's Performance Versus Peers In Capital Markets Sector

April Jalazo, 10% Owner at Zurn Elkay Water (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ZWS#NYSE">ZWS</a>), reported an insider sell on April 18, according to a new SEC filing. 
What Happened: Jalazo opted to sell 250,000 shares of Zurn Elkay Water, according to a Form 4 filing with the <a href="https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/0001439288/000110465924048878//Archives/edgar/data/1439288/000110465924048878/0001104659-24-048878-index.htm">U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission</a> on Thursday. The transaction's total worth stands at $8,019,414.
Monitoring the market, Zurn Elkay Water's shares down by 0.25% at $31.53 during Friday's morning.
<h3>About Zurn Elkay Water</h3>
Zurn Elkay Water Solutions Corp designs procure, manufactures, and markets a range of clean water solutions for drinking water, hygiene, and sustainable water management. The Zurn Elkay product portfolio includes professional-grade water control and safety, water distribution and drainage, drinking water, finish plumbing, hygienic, environmental and site works products for public and private spaces.
<h3>Understanding the Numbers: Zurn Elkay Water's Finances</h3>
Revenue Growth: Zurn Elkay Water's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 31 December, 2023, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 4.85%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Interpreting Earnings Metrics:
<ul>
<li>
Gross Margin: The company maintains a high gross margin of 43.69%, indicating strong cost management and profitability compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
Earnings per Share (EPS): Zurn Elkay Water's EPS is below the industry average, signaling challenges in bottom-line performance with a current EPS of 0.08.
</li>
</ul>
Debt Management: The company maintains a balanced debt approach with a debt-to-equity ratio below industry norms, standing at 0.34.
Market Valuation:
<ul>
<li>
Price to Earnings (P/E) Ratio: The current Price to Earnings ratio of 53.58 is higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
Price to Sales (P/S) Ratio: A higher-than-average P/S ratio of 3.66 suggests overvaluation in the eyes of investors, considering sales performance.
</li>
<li>
EV/EBITDA Analysis (Enterprise Value to its Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation &amp; Amortization): Zurn Elkay Water's EV/EBITDA ratio stands at 21.52, surpassing industry benchmarks. This places the company in a position with a higher-than-average market valuation.
</li>
</ul>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
<a href="https://www.schwab.com/brokerage?aff=XEC">Now trade stocks online commission free with Charles Schwab, a trusted and complete investment firm.</a>
<h3>Why Insider Activity Matters in Finance</h3>
While insider transactions provide valuable information, they should be part of a broader analysis in making investment decisions.
Considering the legal perspective, an "insider" is defined as any officer, director, or beneficial owner holding more than ten percent of a company's equity securities, according to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This includes executives in the c-suite and major hedge funds. These insiders are mandated to disclose their transactions through a Form 4 filing, to be submitted within two business days of the transaction.
Pointing towards optimism, a company insider's new purchase signals their positive anticipation for the stock to rise.
Nevertheless, insider sells may not necessarily indicate a bearish view and can be influenced by various factors.
<h3>Breaking Down the Significance of Transaction Codes</h3>
Navigating through the landscape of transactions, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/investing-tools">investors</a> often prioritize those unfolding in the open market, precisely detailed in Table I of the Form 4 filing. A P in Box 3 denotes a purchase, while S signifies a sale. Transaction code C signals the conversion of an option, and transaction code A denotes a grant, award, or other acquisition of securities from the company.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/sec/insider-trades/search/index?company_cik=0001439288">Check Out The Full List Of Zurn Elkay Water's Insider Trades.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Zurn Elkay Water 10% Owner Sold $8.02M In Company Stock

In the preceding three months, 5 analysts have released ratings for Liberty Energy (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LBRT#NYSE">LBRT</a>), presenting a wide array of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $25.6, with a high estimate of $28.00 and a low estimate of $23.00. This current average has increased by 7.56% from the previous average price target of $23.80. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538824_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Deciphering Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Analysis</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Liberty Energy is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Anderson</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Roger Read</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chase Mulvehill</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$20.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Connor Lynagh</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Luke Lemoine</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$28.00</td>
<td>$27.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Liberty Energy. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Providing a comprehensive analysis, analysts offer qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Liberty Energy compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Liberty Energy's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Navigating through these analyst evaluations alongside other financial indicators can contribute to a holistic understanding of Liberty Energy's market standing. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LBRT/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Liberty Energy analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Liberty Energy's Background</h2>
Liberty Energy is an oilfield services company that provides hydraulic fracturing services—mainly pressure pumping—in major basins throughout North America. Its 2020 acquisition of Schlumberger's OneStim business segment made Liberty one of the largest pressure pumpers in North America. It also added wireline operations, two Permian frac sand mines, and an expanded technological portfolio.
<h3>Liberty Energy: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Liberty Energy's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has faced challenges. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a revenue decline of approximately -12.29%. This indicates a decrease in the company's top-line earnings. When compared to others in the Energy sector, the company faces challenges, achieving a growth rate lower than the average among peers.
Net Margin: Liberty Energy's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of 8.59%, the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Liberty Energy's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of 5.09%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Liberty Energy's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 3.02%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Liberty Energy's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average. With a ratio of 0.22, the company relies less on debt financing, maintaining a healthier balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

LBRT

Analyst Ratings For Liberty Energy

WIIM

Vail Resorts shares are trading lower today after the company provided a late-season update saying the season-to-date total skier visits were down 7.8% YoY and expects to finish the year at the low end of EBITDA guidance range.

Amidst today's fast-paced and highly competitive business environment, it is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Eli Lilly and Co (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LLY#NYSE">LLY</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Pharmaceuticals industry. By analyzing critical financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Eli Lilly and Co Background</h3>
Eli Lilly is a drug firm with a focus on neuroscience, cardiometabolic, cancer, and immunology. Lilly's key products include Verzenio for cancer; Mounjaro, Zepbound, Jardiance, Trulicity, Humalog, and Humulin for diabetes; and Taltz and Olumiant for immunology.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Eli Lilly and Co</td>
<td>128.61</td>
<td>65.84</td>
<td>19.75</td>
<td>19.91%</td>
<td>$3.03</td>
<td>$7.57</td>
<td>28.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Novo Nordisk A/S</td>
<td>46.31</td>
<td>36.11</td>
<td>16.69</td>
<td>22.01%</td>
<td>$28.51</td>
<td>$55.85</td>
<td>36.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Merck &amp; Co Inc</td>
<td>894.50</td>
<td>8.44</td>
<td>5.31</td>
<td>-3.11%</td>
<td>$-0.77</td>
<td>$10.72</td>
<td>5.78%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstraZeneca PLC</td>
<td>35.88</td>
<td>5.41</td>
<td>4.66</td>
<td>2.52%</td>
<td>$2.18</td>
<td>$9.72</td>
<td>7.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Novartis AG</td>
<td>22.58</td>
<td>4.05</td>
<td>4.15</td>
<td>19.99%</td>
<td>$4.18</td>
<td>$8.75</td>
<td>7.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pfizer Inc</td>
<td>68.62</td>
<td>1.62</td>
<td>2.45</td>
<td>-3.62%</td>
<td>$-1.77</td>
<td>$6.69</td>
<td>-41.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sanofi SA</td>
<td>19.89</td>
<td>1.44</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>-0.75%</td>
<td>$0.42</td>
<td>$8.15</td>
<td>6.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Bristol-Myers Squibb Co</td>
<td>12.51</td>
<td>3.33</td>
<td>2.23</td>
<td>6.03%</td>
<td>$4.45</td>
<td>$8.73</td>
<td>0.62%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GSK PLC</td>
<td>13.17</td>
<td>4.84</td>
<td>2.14</td>
<td>2.64%</td>
<td>$1.16</td>
<td>$5.63</td>
<td>9.16%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Zoetis Inc</td>
<td>30.20</td>
<td>14</td>
<td>8.28</td>
<td>10.42%</td>
<td>$0.83</td>
<td>$1.49</td>
<td>8.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd</td>
<td>36.21</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>1.53%</td>
<td>$314.89</td>
<td>$731.71</td>
<td>1.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Viatris Inc</td>
<td>222.20</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>0.87</td>
<td>-3.7%</td>
<td>$-0.07</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>-1.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dr Reddy's Laboratories Ltd</td>
<td>18.94</td>
<td>3.69</td>
<td>3.64</td>
<td>5.29%</td>
<td>$22.42</td>
<td>$42.2</td>
<td>6.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jazz Pharmaceuticals PLC</td>
<td>17.91</td>
<td>1.82</td>
<td>2.05</td>
<td>2.61%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$0.9</td>
<td>4.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Corcept Therapeutics Inc</td>
<td>24.13</td>
<td>4.65</td>
<td>5.25</td>
<td>6.43%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>31.39%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>104.5</td>
<td>6.5</td>
<td>4.4</td>
<td>4.88%</td>
<td>$26.91</td>
<td>$63.73</td>
<td>5.94%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By closely studying Eli Lilly and Co, we can observe the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
Notably, the current Price to Earnings ratio for this stock, 128.61, is 1.23x above the industry norm, reflecting a higher valuation relative to the industry.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 65.84, which is 10.13x the industry average, Eli Lilly and Co might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 19.75, surpassing the industry average by 4.49x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 19.91% that is 15.03% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $3.03 Billion, which is 0.11x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $7.57 Billion is 0.12x below that of its industry, suggesting potential lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company is experiencing remarkable revenue growth, with a rate of 28.1%, outperforming the industry average of 5.94%.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538817_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When assessing Eli Lilly and Co against its top 4 peers using the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following comparisons can be made:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Eli Lilly and Co has a higher debt-to-equity ratio of 2.34.
</li>
<li>
This implies a greater reliance on debt financing, which can expose the company to higher financial risk and potential challenges.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Eli Lilly and Co in the Pharmaceuticals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers, indicating potentially overvalued stock. On the other hand, the high ROE and revenue growth suggest strong profitability and future prospects. However, the low EBITDA and gross profit levels may raise concerns about operational efficiency and cost management within the company.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Exploring The Competitive Space: Eli Lilly and Co Versus Industry Peers In Pharmaceuticals

AMZN

GOOG

GOOGL

SNAP

House Has Enough Votes To Advance Ukraine Aid, TikTok Bills

Solana's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/sol/usd">SOL</a>) price has increased 5.58% over the past 24 hours to $146.0, which is in the opposite direction of its trend over the past week, where it has experienced a 14.0% loss, moving from $167.14 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $259.96. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Solana over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538806_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has increased 118.0% over the past week while the overall circulating supply of the coin has increased 0.32% to over 446.82 million. The current market cap ranking for SOL is #5 at $65.54 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713538806_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$SOL

Solana Rises More Than 5% In 24 hours

Retail Sales Held Up Despite Price Drops Of Many Goods As Spending And Inflation Shifted To Services

As we begin the second half of the year the stock market is up, which is not a given based on all that has transpired, thus far.

Tuesday Talk: A Glorious First Half And A Glorious Fourth

How To Find Market-Beating Trade Ideas

Consumers Are Still At It, Splurging Online, Buying Cars, Eating Out

AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF declares $0.1117 dividend

Restaurant stocks fall after McDonald's warns lower-income consumers are pushing back on high prices

Dunkin' Donuts and Buffalo Wild Wings could go public again as part of Inspire Brands IPO

Restaurant roundup: Shake Shack, CAVA and Wingstop are breakout stars as investors eye margin relief

<a href="https://investorplace.com">InvestorPlace - Stock Market News, Stock Advice &amp; Trading Tips</a>
Several different food-related exchange traded funds (ETFs) are available that dabble in <a href="https://investorplace.com/industries/consumer-discretionary/retail/restaurant/">restaurant stocks</a>.&nbsp;The largest is the Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF (NYSEARCA:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/pej-stock-quote/">PEJ</a>), with net assets of <a href="https://www.invesco.com/us/financial-products/etfs/product-detail?audienceType=Institutional&amp;ticker=PEJ">$298 million</a>. However, only four out of its 31 holdings are pure-play restaurant stocks.&nbsp;



An industry-specific ETF to select for restaurant stocks would be the AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (NYSEARCA:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/eatz-stock-quote/">EATZ</a>). With an appropriately designated stock symbol, EATZ is actively managed and is entirely made up of restaurant chains, except for a couple of food distributors. However, it has less than <a href="https://advisorshares.com/etfs/eatz/">$3 million</a> in net assets, so I wouldn&rsquo;t recommend you buy it.



PEJ and EATZ are up 10% and 6% year-to-date (YTD), with EATZ gaining more than 28% in the past six months, a sign restaurant stocks are on the mend. With this in mind, here are three restaurant stocks that analysts love right now.&nbsp;



<h2>Yum China Holdings (YUMC)</h2>



<div><img width="300" height="169" src="https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/yumc-stock-1-300x169.jpg" alt="A banner for Yum China (YUMC) decorates the New York Stock Exchange."><div>Source: rblfmr / Shutterstock.com</div></div>Yum China Holdings (NYSE:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/yumc-stock-quote/">YUMC</a>) is the largest of the three restaurant stocks on this list, with a market capitalization of $15.5 billion. Of the <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/yumc/analystestimates">33 analysts</a> covering its stock, 22 rate it a &ldquo;buy,&rdquo; with a median target price of $55.07, 43% higher than where it&rsquo;s currently trading.



YUMC is China&rsquo;s operator of KFC and Pizza Hut. But unfortunately, the Chinese population hasn&rsquo;t been dining out as often due to higher inflation in 2023 and a sputtering domestic economy. This has severely reduced Yum China&rsquo;s same-store sales growth.&nbsp;



As a result, YUMC shares are down nearly 40% over the past year. YUMC stock trades at one of the lowest points since Yum Brands (NYSE:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/yum-stock-quote/">YUM</a>) spun it off in <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/ywang/2016/11/01/yum-brands-spins-off-china-unit-in-new-york-amid-losses-in-market-share/?sh=59e099e74b97">November 2016</a>. As recently as March 2023, it traded well over $60.&nbsp;



The company reported strong <a href="https://yumchinaholdingsinc.gcs-web.com/static-files/4a653df7-310b-4190-97c2-384b0189032d">2023 results</a> in February, including a 21% increase in system-wide sales, 7% same-store sales growth, opening nearly 1,700 new stores and an operating profit of $1.1 billion, 79% higher than a year earlier.&nbsp;&nbsp;



Due to the strong year, it plans to buy back $1.25 billion of its stock in 2024 and increase its quarterly dividend to 16 cents. It also plans to open up to 1,700 stores this year to reach 20,000 by the end of 2026. It finished 2023 with 14,644 in over 2,000 cities.&nbsp;



With a bright future ahead, YUMC is one of the restaurant stocks that has value right now.&nbsp;



<h2>Arcos Dorados (ARCO)</h2>



<div><img width="300" height="169" src="https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/mdc-1600-300x169.jpg" alt="McDonald's restaurant in Thailand."><div>Source: Tama2u / Shutterstock</div></div>Arcos Dorados (NYSE:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/arco-stock-quote/">ARCO</a>) is the second-largest of the three restaurant stocks, with a market cap of $2.4 billion. All <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/arco/analystestimates">six analysts</a> covering its stock rate it a &ldquo;buy,&rdquo; with a median target price of $14.30, 27% higher than where it&rsquo;s currently trading.&nbsp;



Just as Yum China focuses on KFC and Pizza Hut restaurants in China, Arcos focuses on McDonald&rsquo;s (NYSE:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/mcd-stock-quote/">MCD</a>) restaurants in Latin America and the Caribbean.&nbsp;



It is the region&rsquo;s largest restaurant chain, with <a href="https://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20240313225693/en/Arcos-Dorados-Reports-Strong-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2023-Financial-Results">2,361 locations</a> as of Dec. 31, 2023. The company owns 71% of them, and the rest are franchised. Approximately 48% of its locations are in Brazil, with the remainder split between northern and southern Latin America.&nbsp;&nbsp;



In 2023, it had $4.33 billion in revenue, up 19.6% from 2022. Its net income was $181.3 million, 29.2% higher than a year earlier.&nbsp;It trades at a reasonable 13x its 2023 earnings of 86 cents. McDonald&rsquo;s trades at <a href="https://www.morningstar.com/stocks/xnys/mcd/valuation">23.3x </a>earnings, almost double.



I <a href="https://investorplace.com/2023/01/the-3-best-south-american-stocks-to-buy-in-2023/">recommended</a> ARCO stock in January 2023 at $8.70 a share. It&rsquo;s up 29% since. It&rsquo;s still a buy in double digits.&nbsp;



<h2>Portillo&rsquo;s (PTLO)</h2>



<div><img width="300" height="169" src="https://investorplace.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/ptlo-stock-1-300x169.jpg" alt="The front of a Portillo's (PTLO) hotdog restaurant in Riverside, California."><div>Source: TonelsonProductions / Shutterstock.com</div></div>Portillo&rsquo;s (NASDAQ:<a href="https://investorplace.com/stock-quotes/ptlo-stock-quote/">PTLO</a>) is the smallest of the three restaurant stocks, with a market capital of $967 million. Seven of the <a href="https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/ptlo/analystestimates">10 analysts</a> covering its stock rate it a &ldquo;buy,&rdquo; with a median target price of $21.11, 59% higher than where it&rsquo;s currently trading.&nbsp;



All three of the restaurant stocks on this list are down in 2024, with Portillo&rsquo;s doing the worst, down by 15%. The operator of fast-casual restaurants serving Chicago-style food went public in October 2021 at <a href="https://investors.portillos.com/news-releases/news-release-details/portillos-inc-announces-pricing-initial-public-offering">$20 a share</a>. Its shares currently trade 34% below its initial public offering (IPO) pricing.&nbsp;



When it went public, it had 67 locations in nine states. Today, <a href="https://investors.portillos.com/news-releases/news-release-details/portillos-inc-announces-fourth-quarter-and-fiscal-year-2023">84</a> are open in 10 states, up from 72 at the end of 2022. In 2023, it opened locations in Arizona, Florida, Illinois and Texas. In 2024, it plans to open at least nine locations.



For its business in 2024, Portillo&rsquo;s expects 12-15% restaurant unit growth, same-store sales growth in the low single digits revenue growth in the mid-teens and adjusted EBITDA growth in the low teens.



In late March, Jefferies analysts <a href="https://www.investing.com/news/company-news/portillos-stock-pt-cut-but-jefferies-maintains-buy-on-solid-fundamentals-93CH-3356826">cut</a> Portillo&rsquo;s price target by $3 to $21. However, it maintained its &ldquo;buy&rdquo; rating on the stock, suggesting that the company will continue to be successful with its expansion plans outside the Chicago area. Skeptics have overstated concerns about the restaurant operator&rsquo;s financials and business, but I think it&rsquo;s another value buy.



On the date of publication, Will Ashworth did not hold (either directly or indirectly) any positions in the securities mentioned in this article. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the writer, subject to the InvestorPlace.com <a href="https://investorplace.com/corporate/investorplace-publishing-guidelines/">Publishing Guidelines</a>.
<div>Will Ashworth has written about investments full-time since 2008. Publications where he&rsquo;s appeared include InvestorPlace, The Motley Fool Canada, Investopedia, Kiplinger, and several others in both the U.S. and Canada. He particularly enjoys creating model portfolios that stand the test of time. He lives in Halifax, Nova Scotia.</div><h3>More From InvestorPlace</h3>
		<ul><li>
						<a href="https://investorplace.com/2023/10/no-1-ai-investment-might-be-this-company-youve-never-heard-of/?cid=MKT764787&amp;eid=MKT771245">The #1 AI Investment Might Be This Company You&rsquo;ve Never Heard Of</a>
					</li>
																<li>
						<a href="https://investorplace.com/2023/07/elon-musks-project-omega-stuns-silicon-valley-insiders/?cid=MKT738510&amp;eid=MKT771236">Musk&rsquo;s &ldquo;Project Omega&rdquo; May Be Set to Mint New Millionaires. Here&rsquo;s How to Get In.</a>
					</li>
																<li>
						<a href="https://investorplace.com/2021/01/one-percenter-issues-urgent-warning/?cid=MKT499868&amp;eid=MKT793997">It doesn&rsquo;t matter if you have $500 or $5 million. Do this now.</a>
					</li>
									</ul><div>
			<div></div>
						<div></div>
					</div>
	
The post <a href="https://investorplace.com/2024/04/wall-street-favorites-3-restaurant-stocks-with-strong-buy-ratings-for-april-2024/">Wall Street Favorites: 3 Restaurant Stocks With Strong Buy Ratings for April 2024</a> appeared first on <a href="https://investorplace.com">InvestorPlace</a>.

Wall Street Favorites: 3 Restaurant Stocks With Strong Buy Ratings for April 2024

ARCO

AWAY

BEDZ

BLMN

CAKE

CAVA

CBRE

CBRL

CRUZ

DENN

EATZ

EBIZ

FDIS

FSTA

FTXG

FWRG

HOTL

IBUY

IEDI

ISHP

JACK

JETS

JRNY

KRUS

LOCO

LULU

ONLN

PBPB

PSCC

PSCD

PTLO

RGLD

RRGB

SHAK

STKS

TSLA

TXRH

USFD

WING

XLRE

YUMC

Equities

Large Cap

Mid Cap

Sector ETFs

Restaurants

Small Cap

Success Stories

ETFs

General

Subway Rival Enjoys Spike In Popularity, Plus: Potbelly's Tasty Stock Performance

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Latest News for AdvisorShares Restaurant ETF (ARCA:EATZ)

Friday, February 16, 2024

Wednesday, August 24, 2022

Wednesday, June 23, 2021