Former President Donald Trump’s lawyers have once again requested the recusal of Judge Juan Merchan from the New York hush money trial.
What Happened: Trump’s legal team is making a second attempt to have Judge Merchan removed from the case. The lawyers argue that the judge’s daughter’s political work and a recent gag order against Trump could influence the trial, reported NBC News.
The attorneys, in a letter to Merchan, expressed concerns over an “unacceptable risk” that the judge’s daughter's employment with political firm Authentic Campaigns could affect his conduct. The firm had worked with Joe Biden's campaign in 2020.
“Your Honor's daughter is an executive and partner at Authentic Campaigns, Inc. As recently as February and March 2024, Authentic has used social media to market its connections to President Biden and Vice President Harris while deriding President Trump,” said the letter, according to the report.
The letter also accuses Merchan of making extrajudicial comments about the case and using his position to issue a statement about an account associated with his daughter. The lawyers have requested permission to file a motion in support of their arguments.
Trump’s attorneys previously sought Merchan's recusal last year, citing "significant conflicts," including his daughter's employment. However, Merchan refused to recuse himself, asserting his ability to be fair and impartial.
The trial, related to hush money paid to adult film star Stormy Daniels during the 2016 presidential campaign, is set to begin on April 15.
Why It Matters: Earlier, Judge Merchan imposed a gag order on Trump, which was described as different from previous gag orders by the ex-president’s niece Mary Trump.
Trump initiated a verbal onslaught against the judge’s daughter after the imposition of the order. In response, an expanded gag order was issued on Tuesday.
State Judge Merchan barred Trump from attacking family members of Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, noting such attacks posed a threat to judicial integrity and trial participation. Trump’s legal team had defended his comments as protected speech, while Bragg’s office argued they intimidated witnesses and trial participants.
Engineered by Benzinga Neuro, Edited by Shivdeep Dhaliwal
The GPT-4-based Benzinga Neuro content generation system exploits the extensive Benzinga Ecosystem, including native data, APIs, and more to create comprehensive and timely stories for you. Learn more.
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.
