- On Friday, a jury in Illinois decided that Johnson & Johnson JNJ was not liable for the death of 69-year-old Elizabeth Driscoll, who used the Company's talc-based powders for decades.
- Driscoll's family had blamed Johnson & Johnson's products for causing her ovarian cancer.
- The Illinois case, filed in 2018 by relatives on behalf of Elizabeth Driscoll, who died from ovarian cancer in 2016, sought up to $50 million in damages, claiming that JNJ knew that both its baby powder and Shower to Shower products were unsafe.
- However, following a three-week trial, jurors in St. Clair County, Illinois, ruled in favor of Johnson & Johnson.
- Meanwhile, J&J is facing about 29,000 reported cases that could add billions to its legal expenses.
- In a Securities and Exchange Commission filing in early 2021, J&J estimated its litigation expenses at $3.9 billion, noting the cost was "primarily associated with talc-related reserves and certain settlements."
- Price Action: JNJ shares are up 0.18% at $172.51 during the market session on the last check Monday.
© 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Comments
Loading...
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing
Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.
Join Now: Free!
Already a member?Sign in