On Wednesday, BlackRock, Inc. BLK, the world's largest asset manager, made waves in the exchange-traded funds industry by announcing lower fees for 15 of its iShares core ETFs. With that news, it can legitimately be said that iShares, the world's largest ETF issuer, is taking the fee fight to its competitors.
In fact, many of the 15 iShares core ETFs that now have lower expense ratios are also now less expensive than the equivalent Vanguard ETFs. Yes, that is right. iShares now issues a slew of ETFs that are less expensive than the competing Vanguard funds. Perhaps the next fee news from Vanguard will be going to zero. After all, Vanguard is a financial services company in non-profit clothing. (Insert “LOL” and smiling emojis here.) Anyway, that is a story for another day.
The ongoing fee battles in ETF Land also strike at the heart of active management, which is fighting a seemingly losing battle on two fronts: higher fees with slack performances relative to cheaper index funds and ETFs.
“In the 12 months ended August, actively managed large blend mutual funds and ETFs shed $57 billion in assets while passive products in the style gathered $108 billion, according to Morningstar,” said S&P Capital IQ in a note out Wednesday. “Not coincidentally, the SPIVA mid 2016 scorecard revealed that only 19 percent of active large cap core funds outperformed the S&P 500 index in the one-year period ended June 2016. Looking back further, 12 percent and 8 percent of the active funds outperformed in the three- and five-year periods. Adoption of low-cost, passive products has been strong in a variety of equity and fixed income investment styles.”
The Battle May Have Just Begun
With some of the new expense ratios on the iShares core ETFs, it will be hard if not impossible to find lower fees on competing product, at least until a rival fund issuer responds and there are no guarantees that will happen.
For example, the iShares S&P 500 Index (ETF) IVV is now charging 0.04 percent per year, or $4 on a $10,000 investment and one basis point different per year than the fee on the Vanguard 500 Index Fund VOO.
Likewise, the new fees on the iShares Core Emerging Markets ETF (iShares Inc. IEMG) and the iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (iShares Trust DGRO) are slightly below the expense ratios found on the Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fd VWO and the Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF VIG.
VIG and VWO are the largest ETFs tracking their respective asset classes.
“VOO and IVV track the same index making comparisons relatively simple. For example, iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets (IEMG) holds South Korean stocks and not China A shares while Vanguard FTSE Emerging Markets (VWO) tracks a different index and is constructed with the inverse approach. IEMG now costs 14 basis points, 1 basis point less than VWO,” added S&P Capital IQ.
© 2022 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on Bankrate.com. The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.
All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to improve the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the Bankrate.com rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.
Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.
Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.