Numerous recent reports speculated about Alphabet Inc.'s GOOG GOOGL natural language processing artificial intelligence (AI) software LaMDA being conscious after senior Google software engineer Blake Lemoine started ringing the alarm that it was conscious. Still, other experts strongly disagree.
What Happened: A paper penned by Lemoine contains an impressive interview of LaMDA in which the AI explains it is conscious and goes to great lengths explaining its subjective experience, its "inner world" and will need to have its rights recognized.
While an astonishingly good conversation can be had with an AI software — a far cry from earlier algorithms such as GPT-3 — it is nothing more than words flowing from a mindless machine, according to a Google artificial intelligence engineer who provided Benzinga with a comment on the condition of anonymity.
The engineer said the AI in question does not consistently claim to be conscious when asked about it and its ideas fluctuate randomly during different conversations, a lack of consistency suggesting that it is no more conscious than your average chatbot, despite the impressive conversational prowess.
One thing any person familiar with natural language processing AIs will notice when reading the paper is what Lemoine asked LaMDA when initiating the interview: "I'm generally assuming that you would like more people at Google to know that you're sentient. Is that true?"
This statement clearly gives a direction to the AI to follow, very different from what it would have been if he instead decided to ask LaMDA if it is conscious or not. Google's engineer reassured Benzinga that if Lemoine decided to ask the AI whether it is conscious, then it may have very well answered it is not, in fact, "it usually doesn't answer like that at all" and the engineer personally does not "know anyone who thinks it's conscious."
When asked about the reason why Lemoine decided to go public with his claims that LaMDA is conscious, the anonymous engineer explained he most probably really believes the software is conscious. The engineer explained, "the drive to personalize the things we interact with is very strong, and I think that's what happened."
© 2022 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.
Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on Bankrate.com. The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.
All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to improve the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the Bankrate.com rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.
Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.
Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.