'Black Swan' Author Nassim Taleb Criticizes Balaji Srinivasan's Bitcoin Trade: Potential Way To Take On The Bet

Zinger Key Points
  • Taleb raised a question on Twitter asking how the trade could be used as an arbitrage opportunity.
  • A forward contract is a private contract signed between two counterparties, unlike a futures contract where standardized market prices exist
  • Taleb highlighted the difference between forward spot and future spot terming it as the most disturbing finance error.

The Black Swan” author Nassim Nicholas Taleb has criticized former Coinbase COIN CTO Balaji Srinivasan's Bitcoin BTC/USD trade, which the latter structured based on the belief that the cryptocurrency’s price could surge up to $1 million in 90 days due to the rapid devaluation of the dollar.

What Happened: Taleb raised a question on Twitter asking how the trade could be used as an arbitrage opportunity.

"Technical Quiz. Show it is arbitrageable: Sell him the forward & buy x btc to lock-in a profit. What is the optimal x?" Taleb questioned and later said the "answer is only 1 if Btc has no volatility."

See Also: How to Invest in Startups

The Bet: In belief that Bitcoin will hit $1 million in value in 90 days due to rapid devaluation of the dollar, Srinivasan has asked his counter-party to buy one Bitcoin while he will send $1 million. If Bitcoin stays below $1 million in 90 days, the counterparty gets to keep both the Bitcoin they bought as well as the $1 million worth of USD Coin USDC/USD that Srinivasan bet. If Bitcoin surpasses $1 million in 90 days, Srinivasan gets to keep the Bitcoin bought by the counterparty and the $1 million worth USD Coin bet by him.

Author’s Take: It is unclear how exactly Taleb would have structured the trade.

Here's one potential way to take on Srinivasan's bet without the possibility of a loss. It is noteworthy that a Twitter user named “Noise Trader” first proposed this idea.

Of course, there are many ways to construct the trade and certain caveats like possibilities of counterparty default, brokerage costs and funding costs are discounted in this one.

To structure the trade, the counterparty could buy two Bitcoins at the current price of $27,000.

Scenario 1: Let's consider Bitcoin hits $1.1 million in value at the end of 90 days. In this case, Srinivasan's counterparty has to deliver one unit since they entered the bet. The counterparty, however, also makes a profit on the additional token they held as hedge. As a result, the total profit made in this scenario stands at $1.046 million, which is the difference between the current price of one Bitcoin and the original acquisition cost of two tokens.

Scenario 2: Let's consider Bitcoin fails to surpass $1 million in value and stays, for example, at the current price of $27,000 by the end of the proposed 90 days. The counterparty will profit from $1 million worth of USD coins bet by Srinivasan that they get to keep while both the Bitcoins acquired originally could be sold at the current value to pare the initial cost.

Read Next: Credit Suisse Bondholders Angry As $17B Of AT1 Debt To Be Written Down To Zero: What It Means

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Posted In: CryptocurrencyNewsMarketsBalaji SrinivasanCoinbaseNassim Nicholas TalebThe Black Swan
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!