Benzinga

España
Italia
대한민국
日本
Français
Benzinga Edge
Benzinga Research
Benzinga Pro

  • Get Benzinga Pro
  • Data & APIs
  • Events
  • Premarket
  • Advertise
Contribute
España
Italia
대한민국
日本
Français

Benzinga

  • Premium Services
  • Financial News
    Latest
    Earnings
    Guidance
    Dividends
    M&A
    Buybacks
    Interviews
    Management
    Offerings
    IPOs
    Insider Trades
    Biotech/FDA
    Politics
    Healthcare
    Small-Cap
  • Markets
    Pre-Market
    After Hours
    Movers
    ETFs
    Options
    Cryptocurrency
    Commodities
    Bonds
    Futures
    Mining
    Real Estate
    Volatility
  • Ratings
    Analyst Color
    Downgrades
    Upgrades
    Initiations
    Price Target
  • Investing Ideas
    Trade Ideas
    Long Ideas
    Short Ideas
    Technicals
    Analyst Ratings
    Analyst Color
    Latest Rumors
    Whisper Index
    Stock of the Day
    Best Stocks & ETFs
    Best Penny Stocks
    Best S&P 500 ETFs
    Best Swing Trade Stocks
    Best Blue Chip Stocks
    Best High-Volume Penny Stocks
    Best Small Cap ETFs
    Best Stocks to Day Trade
    Best REITs
  • Money
    Investing
    Cryptocurrency
    Mortgage
    Insurance
    Yield
    Personal Finance
    Forex
    Startup Investing
    Real Estate Investing
    Prop Trading
    Credit Cards
    Stock Brokers
Research
My Stocks
Tools
Free Benzinga Pro Trial
Calendars
Analyst Ratings Calendar
Conference Call Calendar
Dividend Calendar
Earnings Calendar
Economic Calendar
FDA Calendar
Guidance Calendar
IPO Calendar
M&A Calendar
Unusual Options Activity Calendar
SPAC Calendar
Stock Split Calendar
Trade Ideas
Free Stock Reports
Insider Trades
Trade Idea Feed
Analyst Ratings
Unusual Options Activity
Heatmaps
Free Newsletter
Government Trades
Perfect Stock Portfolio
Easy Income Portfolio
Short Interest
Most Shorted
Largest Increase
Largest Decrease
Calculators
Margin Calculator
Forex Profit Calculator
100x Options Profit Calculator
Screeners
Stock Screener
Top Momentum Stocks
Top Quality Stocks
Top Value Stocks
Top Growth Stocks
Compare Best Stocks
Best Momentum Stocks
Best Quality Stocks
Best Value Stocks
Best Growth Stocks
Connect With Us
facebookinstagramlinkedintwitteryoutubeblueskymastodon
About Benzinga
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Market Resources
  • Advanced Stock Screener Tools
  • Options Trading Chain Analysis
  • Comprehensive Earnings Calendar
  • Dividend Investor Calendar and Alerts
  • Economic Calendar and Market Events
  • IPO Calendar and New Listings
  • Market Outlook and Analysis
  • Wall Street Analyst Ratings and Targets
Trading Tools & Education
  • Benzinga Pro Trading Platform
  • Options Trading Strategies and News
  • Stock Market Trading Ideas and Analysis
  • Technical Analysis Charts and Indicators
  • Fundamental Analysis and Valuation
  • Day Trading Guides and Strategies
  • Live Investors Events
  • Pre market Stock Analysis and News
  • Cryptocurrency Market Analysis and News
Ring the Bell

A newsletter built for market enthusiasts by market enthusiasts. Top stories, top movers, and trade ideas delivered to your inbox every weekday before and after the market closes.

  • Terms & Conditions
  • Do Not Sell My Personal Data/Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer
  • Service Status
  • Sitemap
© 2026 Benzinga | All Rights Reserved
October 12, 2019 1:49 PM 5 min read

Why The Cannabis Industry Needs To Be Better About Age Verification

by Benzinga Cannabis
Follow

By identity verification and authentication solutions firm Jumio.

Cannabis is now fully legal in 11 U.S. states, plus Washington D.C., and that number continues to grow. Consumers 21 and older can now order cannabis products directly online and have them delivered right to their front door. It’s a dream come true for cannabis consumers, but there has been some controversy over age verification compliance during online transactions.

This new, highly controversial industry already endures scrutiny when cannabis and paraphernalia end up in the hands of underage consumers. As online sales increase, vendors must be able to confidently determine that an individual's digital identity matches the real-world person making the purchase (and that the customer is of legal age).

In fact, among persons aged 18 or older who reported lifetime marijuana use, almost 53 percent report first using marijuana between ages 12 and 17. About 2 percent report that they first used marijuana before age 12. Unfortunately, most identity and age verification methods fall short of that ask. 

Traditional Age Verification Methods Are Failing

Traditional methods of age verification depend on whether the product is being purchased online or within a dispensary. In online channels, companies rely solely on self-reporting, where the consumer simply interacts with a pop-up screen that asks for their date of birth. If the date of birth provided exceeds the minimum age requirement, the consumer can access the website and make online purchases. If the date doesn’t match, they’re denied access to the website.

On the other hand, the process for an in-store buyer is different and a bit more rigorous.

When a new user walks into a dispensary, they are often greeted by a “budtender” who will ask to see the customer’s driver’s license or other government-issued ID. They inspect the ID document, usually take a copy of it for their records, and sometimes ping a third-party database to verify the age and ensure the ID is legitimate. After the customer has been vetted and their age verified, they are usually asked to scan in their ID document on subsequent visits. The newly scanned ID is compared to the ID document on file to confirm it’s a match, and the user can then enter the dispensary and make cannabis purchases.

There are risks associated with either channel.

With the online channel, self-reported information provides virtually no actual proof of age and is unlikely to withstand any type of regulatory scrutiny. The in-store channel is a bit stronger because of the visual inspection of the ID document, but this avenue still lacks definitive proof because these documents can be so easily manipulated or even purchased off the dark web.

If someone provides an ID purporting to be John Smith at 123 Main Street and 21 years of age, how does the budtender know the ID is authentic? Unfortunately, there are so many security features embedded within today’s driver’s licenses, ID cards and passports, that it’s virtually impossible for untrained people to delineate between legitimate and fake IDs.

What Are The Implications Of Mismanaged Age Verification?

There are a number of potential repercussions of mismanaged age verification in the cannabis industry, all of which could hinder the growth of its legalization. Consider the current wave of legislation impacting the e-cigarette and vaping industry. As of September 2019, electronic cigarette users in New York are no longer able to buy such flavors as cotton candy under a new state ban approved by the Department of Health.

On a broader scale, Trump administration officials, alarmed by new data showing a huge jump in vaping by young people, are moving to ban most flavored e-cigarettes, a major development that could result in sweeping changes in the sprawling market. The cannabis industry should absolutely be shaking in its boots.

While many e-cigarette and vaping companies seemingly market their products to younger consumers, the cannabis industry is likely to be embroiled in a similar controversy. The repercussions for mismanaged age verification include hefty fines and brand damage (if local media get a hold of the story). If there’s enough bad press, then many jurisdictions may be forced to outlaw the sale of cannabis within their city or township.

What Can Be Done To Ensure Cannabis Consumers Are The Age They Claim To Be?

Thankfully, our ever-evolving technology market can offer an incredibly accurate and safe means of age verification to not only protect suppliers from scrutiny, but the industry altogether. For example, face-based biometric verification can offer a viable alternative to current methods of age verification.

Photo by Javier Hasse.

The preceding article is from one of our external contributors. It does not represent the opinion of Benzinga and has not been edited.

Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs

© 2026 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.


Posted In:
CannabisNewsMarketsGeneral
Beat the Market With Our Free Pre-Market Newsletter
Enter your email to get Benzinga's ultimate morning update: The PreMarket Activity Newsletter

When combined with advanced technologies, like artificial intelligence and certified liveness detection, these methods can provide powerful disincentive for underage customers using a parent’s ID or a fake ID. In order to assess the validity of the ID, these types of solutions can capture ID documents, extract the data to assess their authenticity, and then use computer vision, machine learning and AI together to verify IDs in real time.
This type of methodology provides a much more comprehensive means validating a consumer’s age and goes further than just your general check box or quick glance at a government-issued ID. This is just one example of a potential solution to a sweeping issue in the industry and a giant step up from the methods being used currently. Many highly-regulated industries — like banking and online gaming — are also resorting to face-based authentication to meet intense regulatory demands, so the cannabis industry is not alone in its struggles.

It’s clearly time to evolve beyond self-reported age verification. This is integral for online sales, but also vitally important at in-store dispensaries, as most budtenders are not fully equipped to identify fake IDs. Dispensaries need to pay attention to the current e-cigarette and vaping climate, and take every measure to stay above the fray, and this starts with reliable age verification. The good news is there are already proven methods, used by other industries, that can provide a much higher level of age verification assurance that can better withstand regulatory and jurisdictional scrutiny.

Comments
Loading...