Short interest for Greenbriar Sustainable gives investors a sense of the degree to which investors are betting on the decline of Greenbriar Sustainable's stock. Short interest data is updated every two weeks.

Greenbriar Sustainable (OTC:GEBRF) Stock, Short Interest Report

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc is a leading developer of entry-level housing, renewable energy, green technology and sustainable investment projects. It is focused on its three primary projects: a 1000-unit, entry-level housing project in California, the 400MW Solar Project in Alberta, and the largest renewable energy project in the Caribbean.

News

Movers & Shakers

Intraday Update

Markets

Movers

Trading Ideas

General

AABVF

AFOM

AKER

ALGDF

ALKM

ASRT

BERK

BLRX

BNFT

BRVRF

CAPR

CBDL

CCCGY

CCTR

CHPMF

CMCT

CTMCF

CTRA

CTVA

CTXR

CZNI

ECDD

ELLXF

EMERALD HEALTH THERAPUTCS by Emerald Health Therapeutics Inc.

EMHTF

EPEGQ

ERDCF

ETSY

EVIO

EVSI

FECOF

FLOOF

FLSS

FPAFY

FWDG

GBLTF

GEBRF

GTEC

HHPHF

HITIF

JPOTF

KELYB

KLXE

LLIT

LMRXF

LNGYF

MCET

MGLQF

MJARF

MSNVF

MSPC

NEWA

NICXF

NWSZF

NXTTF

PFMT

PINS

PROSF

PRPM

PXPP

QRTEA

QRTEB

RIGH

RRIF

SAGE

SCOO

SEDO

SFET

SIGA

SIML

SNDL

SNSS

SRUTF

TGRO

THTX

TIGR

TLRY

TINLEY BEVERAGE CO ORD by Tinley Beverage Co, Inc.

TNYBF

TPPRF

UWEFF

VEND

VIBI

VIZC

VREOF

WHLM

VBSCF

Stocks That Hit 52-Week Lows On Thursday

AACAY

AAWW

ABBV

ABMD

ACGBF

ACRGF

ADMP

AERI

AGTK

AIBGY

ALNA

ALSWF

AMAG

ANGI

APGMF

APNHY

APOP

ARCH

ARLO

ARLP

ARREF

Alterity Therapeutics Limited - American Depositary Shares

ATHE

ATHOF

ATRA

ATVK

AVNS

AWLCF

AXGN

AXVEF

AZRX

AZZUF

BAFYY

BBCP

BBVA

BBVXF

BCDA

BCEFF

BCEL

BCYC

BDVSY

BEDU

BFIN

BHKLY

BICEF

BIDU

BIOAF

BIREF

BJRI

BKKLY

BKRIF

BKRIY

BLCM

BLMN

BNDSF

BNEFF

BPAQF

BPFH

BRKMY

BRTX

BrightSphere Investment Group plc Ordinary Shares

BSIG

BTHE

BUDZ

BWFG

BXEFF

BZLFY

CADE

CAIXY

CAKE

CALX

CARB

CARCY

CARG

CARS

Stocks That Fell Through 52-Week Lows Wednesday

Cannabis

Opinion

CPIVF

Bulls And Bud Of The Week: Captiva Verde And The Sweet Science Of Cannabis

GREENBRIAR SUSBLE LIVING by GREENBRIAR SUSTAINABLE LIVING INC

Greenbriar Sustainable Living Inc

The first season of MrBeast&#8216;s &#8220;Beast Games,&#8221; a reality show that transitioned the YouTube sensation to television, has recently concluded on Amazon Prime Video. The final episode featured a contestant walking away with an impressive $10 million prize.
What Happened: The reality show, which saw 1,000 participants battling it out in a series of&nbsp;mental and physical challenges, has&nbsp;been a massive hit, largely due to its substantial prize pool. Jeff Allen, also known as Player 831, emerged as the grand winner, pocketing slightly more than $10 million.
MrBeast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, disclosed that the total prize money awarded throughout the season was slightly above $25 million. Apart from the grand prize, Allen also earned an additional $4,042 from various challenges during the season.
According to the report <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/dimitarmixmihov/2025/02/14/beast-games-heres-how-much-money-players-won-on-mrbeasts-10-million-game-show/">by </a>Forbes, a total of 85 players won cash prizes, with the top ten winners taking home amounts ranging from $100,000 to over $10 million. The remaining winners received prizes between $14,000 and $19,231.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/02/37195970/youtubes-top-earner-mrbeast-says-hes-not-rich-because-of-this-one-reason">YouTube&#8217;s Top Earner MrBeast Says He&#8217;s Not Rich Because Of This One Reason</a>
MrBeast also revealed that $4.2 million was distributed&nbsp;to Beast Games viewers who&nbsp;participated in a giveaway, a&nbsp;part of a brand partnership&nbsp;with a popular borrowing and&nbsp;lending app.
Why It Matters: The success of Beast Games underscores the growing trend of digital creators transitioning into traditional media. MrBeast&#8217;s move from YouTube to a television reality show signifies the increasing influence of digital creators and the potential of such platforms to create engaging content that attracts massive viewership.
The substantial prize pool also highlights the financial power of digital creators and their ability to attract audiences and sponsors. 
The distribution of $4.2 million to viewers&nbsp;as part of a brand&nbsp;partnership demonstrates the potential for innovative marketing strategies that engage audiences directly.
Read Next
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/entertainment/23/05/32297538/mrbeast-invades-suburbia-buys-neighborhood-cul-de-sac-to-create-ultimate-friend-zone">MrBeast Invades Suburbia: Buys Neighborhood Cul-De-Sac To Create Ultimate Friend Zone</a>
Image: Shutterstock

Entertainment

MrBeast's Beast Games Wraps Up First Season - Here's How Much Money Players Won

In the dynamic and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) and its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>54.35</td>
<td>9.34</td>
<td>58.74%</td>
<td>$45.91</td>
<td>$58.27</td>
<td>3.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>11.03</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.94</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>$2.61</td>
<td>15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>21.05</td>
<td>4.53</td>
<td>1.70</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>21.68</td>
<td>26.83</td>
<td>3.85</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>19.53</td>
<td>1.94</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>41.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>173.18</td>
<td>15.62</td>
<td>7.82</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>8.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>11.47</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>0.70</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>59.55</td>
<td>3.64</td>
<td>1.10</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>23.31</td>
<td>0.97</td>
<td>0.59</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>42.6</td>
<td>6.91</td>
<td>2.27</td>
<td>7.43%</td>
<td>$0.42</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>21.69%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By thoroughly analyzing Apple, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 38.34, which is 0.9x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 54.35, which is 7.87x the industry average, Apple might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.34, surpassing the industry average by 4.11x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 58.74% is 51.31% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $45.91 Billion, which is 109.31x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $58.27 Billion, which indicates 71.06x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 3.95% compared to the industry average of 21.69%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804446_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Apple stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Compared to its top 4 peers, Apple has a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 1.45, indicating a balanced financial structure.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company maintains a reasonable level of debt while also leveraging equity financing.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, but may be facing challenges in revenue expansion.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Assessing Apple's Performance Against Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

Over the past 24 hours, Ethereum's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/eth/usd">ETH</a>) price rose 4.62% to $2,817.65. This continues its positive trend over the past week where it has experienced a 5.0% gain, moving from $2,649.93 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $4,878.26. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Ethereum over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804437_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has tumbled 26.0% over the past week along with the circulating supply of the coin, which has fallen 0.05%. This brings the circulating supply to 120.56 million. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for ETH is #2 at $339.41 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804437_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

$ETH

Ethereum Rises More Than 4% In 24 hours

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>41.66</td>
<td>8.54</td>
<td>3.87</td>
<td>6.19%</td>
<td>$32.08</td>
<td>$31.0</td>
<td>11.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>24.82</td>
<td>2.18</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
<td>$54.02</td>
<td>$92.47</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>12.08</td>
<td>4.43</td>
<td>3.51</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>73.29</td>
<td>26.17</td>
<td>5.73</td>
<td>10.37%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>35.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>12.85</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>0.40</td>
<td>5.22%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>43.95</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>1.56</td>
<td>1.74%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>17.45</td>
<td>6.12</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>11.59%</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.44</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>0.56</td>
<td>2.76%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>-9.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>12.86</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>6.37%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>-3.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>22.96</td>
<td>5.42</td>
<td>3.75</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>31.76</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>24.77</td>
<td>1.01</td>
<td>0.18</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>15.39</td>
<td>4.07</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>24.61</td>
<td>4.18</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>5.09%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>5.34</td>
<td>0.35</td>
<td>0.08</td>
<td>0.58%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>-8.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groupon Inc</td>
<td>18.45</td>
<td>12.66</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>34.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-9.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>41.40</td>
<td>10.88</td>
<td>0.51</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>24.34</td>
<td>6.23</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>7.13%</td>
<td>$6.54</td>
<td>$13.55</td>
<td>7.83%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Amazon.com, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The current Price to Earnings ratio of 41.66 is 1.71x higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 8.54, which is 1.37x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 3.87, which is 2.16x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.19%, which is 0.94% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.08 Billion, which is 4.91x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $31.0 Billion, which indicates 2.29x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 11.04% exceeds the industry average of 7.83%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804436_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Amazon.com stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Amazon.com has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. The low ROE suggests that Amazon.com is not generating significant returns on shareholder equity. However, the high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth show that the company is performing well in terms of operational and financial metrics compared to its industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Exploring The Competitive Space: Amazon.com Versus Industry Peers In Broadline Retail

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>30.53</td>
<td>10.11</td>
<td>11.58</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>$28.26</td>
<td>$39.55</td>
<td>20.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>23.15</td>
<td>6.98</td>
<td>6.62</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>12.84</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>1.85</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>14.64</td>
<td>5.58</td>
<td>7.49</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>36.09</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>7.44</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>339</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>24.73</td>
<td>3.61</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>7.46</td>
<td>0.74</td>
<td>1.61</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>14.38</td>
<td>0.49</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>68.27</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>40.12</td>
<td>1.31</td>
<td>1.77</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>8.37</td>
<td>0.89</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>53.55</td>
<td>2.61</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>2.99%</td>
<td>$4.21</td>
<td>$6.75</td>
<td>4.12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting a comprehensive analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 30.53 is 0.57x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 10.11 which exceeds the industry average by 3.87x.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.58, surpassing the industry average by 3.56x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.0%, which is 9.01% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $28.26 Billion, which is 6.71x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $39.55 Billion, which indicates 5.86x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 20.63% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 4.12%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804428_0_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Meta Platforms and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Meta Platforms has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The PE, PB, and PS ratios for Meta Platforms indicate that it may be overvalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. However, its high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong operational performance and growth potential relative to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comparing Meta Platforms With Industry Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

Aramark's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARMK#NYSE">ARMK</a>) short percent of float has fallen 23.92% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 4.20 million shares sold short, which is 1.59% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.56 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Aramark Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804428_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Aramark has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Aramark's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Aramark's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.23%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Looking Into Aramark's Recent Short Interest

Comments

Greenbriar Sustainable

Short Interest

Greenbriar Sustainable (OTC:GEBRF) Stock, Short Interest Report

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga