Latest news for Aalberts (OTC:AALBF) Stock

Aalberts NV develops technologies and projects to enhance building and product efficiencies. It offers valve and control technologies, specialized manufacturing processes, and piping systems to distribute water and gas. The firm has two operating segments: Building Technology and Industrial Technology. The majority of the company's revenue is generated from the Building Technology segment which develops, manufactures and monitors hydronic flow control systems for heating and cooling to improve energy efficiency and develops, designs and manufactures integrated piping systems to distribute and regulate water or gas flows in heating, cooling, water, gas and sprinkler systems in eco-friendly buildings and industrial niches. Geographically, the company derives key revenue from Europe.

AALBERTS INDUS NV ORD by A. Alberts Industries

Aalberts NV

H&amp;R Block (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HRB#NYSE">HRB</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 2.77% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 15.37%. Currently, H&amp;R Block has a market capitalization of $7.95 billion. 
Buying $1000 In HRB: If an investor had bought $1000 of HRB stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $2,049.30 today based on a price of $56.95 for HRB at the time of writing.
<h3>H&amp;R Block's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722029438_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

News

Trading Ideas

If You Invested $1000 In This Stock 5 Years Ago, You Would Have $2,000 Today

Apollo Global Management (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/APO#NYSE">APO</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 5.7% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 16.62%. Currently, Apollo Global Management has a market capitalization of $69.51 billion. 
Buying $1000 In APO: If an investor had bought $1000 of APO stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $4,546.33 today based on a price of $122.16 for APO at the time of writing.
<h3>Apollo Global Management's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722029433_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$1000 Invested In Apollo Global Management 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Citigroup analyst Atif Malik maintains Teradyne (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TER#NASDAQ">TER</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $185 to $162.

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Citigroup Maintains Buy on Teradyne, Lowers Price Target to $162

During the last three months, 5 analysts shared their evaluations of Puma Biotechnology (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PBYI#NASDAQ">PBYI</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $7.0, a high estimate of $7.00, and a low estimate of $7.00. The average price target has stayed the same, reflecting a consistent view from analysts. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722027698_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Puma Biotechnology is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Edward White</td>
<td>HC Wainwright &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Edward White</td>
<td>HC Wainwright &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Edward White</td>
<td>HC Wainwright &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Edward White</td>
<td>HC Wainwright &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Edward White</td>
<td>HC Wainwright &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
<td>$7.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts frequently update their recommendations based on evolving market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Puma Biotechnology. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Puma Biotechnology compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Puma Biotechnology's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Puma Biotechnology's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PBYI/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Puma Biotechnology analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>All You Need to Know About Puma Biotechnology</h2>
Puma Biotechnology Inc is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and commercializes innovative products to enhance cancer care and improve treatment outcomes for patients. It is currently commercializing NERLYNX, an oral version of neratinib, for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. Also it develops alisertib. Alisertib is a selective, small-molecule inhibitor of aurora kinase A that is designed to disrupt mitosis leading to apoptosis of rapidly proliferating tumor cells that are dependent on aurora kinase A.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Puma Biotechnology's Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization: Surpassing industry standards, the company's market capitalization asserts its dominance in terms of size, suggesting a robust market position.
Revenue Challenges: Puma Biotechnology's revenue growth over 3 months faced difficulties. As of 31 March, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately -17.07%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Health Care sector.
Net Margin: Puma Biotechnology's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional net margin, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable net margin of -11.0%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Puma Biotechnology's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of -9.22%, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.
Return on Assets (ROA): Puma Biotechnology's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching -2.17%. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Puma Biotechnology's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 2.17, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

PBYI

Where Puma Biotechnology Stands With Analysts

During the last three months, 10 analysts shared their evaluations of Lennox Intl (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LII#NYSE">LII</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
Summarizing their recent assessments, the table below illustrates the evolving sentiments in the past 30 days and compares them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Lennox Intl, presenting an average target of $581.9, a high estimate of $675.00, and a low estimate of $517.00. This upward trend is apparent, with the current average reflecting a 7.66% increase from the previous average price target of $540.50.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722027675_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Lennox Intl. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Julian Mitchell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$550.00</td>
<td>$517.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tommy Moll</td>
<td>Stephens &amp; Co.</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$675.00</td>
<td>$675.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Deane Dray</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$572.00</td>
<td>$566.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Hammond</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$600.00</td>
<td>$515.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Timothy Wojs</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$610.00</td>
<td>$505.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Julian Mitchell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$517.00</td>
<td>$500.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joe Ritchie</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$575.00</td>
<td>$507.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph O'Dea</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$570.00</td>
<td>$550.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gautam Khanna</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$600.00</td>
<td>$550.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph O'Dea</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$550.00</td>
<td>$520.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Lennox Intl. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Gaining insights, analysts provide qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Lennox Intl compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Lennox Intl's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
For valuable insights into Lennox Intl's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/LII/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Lennox Intl analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Delving into Lennox Intl's Background</h2>
Lennox International manufactures and distributes heating, ventilating, air conditioning, and refrigeration products to replacement (75% of sales) and new construction (25% of sales) markets. In fiscal 2023, residential HVAC was 68% of sales and commercial HVAC and Heatcraft refrigeration was 32% of sales. The company goes to market with multiple brands, but Lennox is the company's flagship HVAC brand. The Texas-based company is focused on North America after the sale of its European HVAC and refrigeration businesses in late 2023.
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Lennox Intl</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Above industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization emphasizes a noteworthy size, indicative of a strong market presence.
Revenue Growth: Over the 3 months period, Lennox Intl showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of 2.81% as of 30 June, 2024. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 16.95%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Lennox Intl's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 51.98% ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Lennox Intl's ROA surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 7.92% ROA, the company effectively utilizes its assets for optimal returns.
Debt Management: Lennox Intl's debt-to-equity ratio is notably higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 2.72, the company relies more heavily on borrowed funds, indicating a higher level of financial risk.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.
In addition to their assessments, some analysts extend their insights by offering predictions for key metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates. This supplementary information provides further guidance for traders. It is crucial to recognize that, despite their specialization, analysts are human and can only provide forecasts based on their beliefs.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

10 Analysts Have This To Say About Lennox Intl

Taiwan Semiconductor (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSM#NYSE">TSM</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 12.34% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 23.26%. Currently, Taiwan Semiconductor has a market capitalization of $837.03 billion. 
Buying $1000 In TSM: If an investor had bought $1000 of TSM stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $7,815.64 today based on a price of $161.40 for TSM at the time of writing.
<h3>Taiwan Semiconductor's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722027659_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$1000 Invested In Taiwan Semiconductor 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Canadian Natural Res (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CNQ#NYSE">CNQ</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 9.75% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 22.36%. Currently, Canadian Natural Res has a market capitalization of $73.53 billion. 
Buying $100 In CNQ: If an investor had bought $100 of CNQ stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $279.38 today based on a price of $34.42 for CNQ at the time of writing.
<h3>Canadian Natural Res's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722027654_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Canadian Natural Res Stock In The Last 5 Years

Providing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish, 7 analysts have published ratings on Betterware de Mexico SAPI (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BWMX#NYSE">BWMX</a>) in the last three months.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">7</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $22.5, with a high estimate of $22.50 and a low estimate of $22.50. Consistency is reflected as the current average remains at the same level as the previous average price target. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722027642_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Betterware de Mexico SAPI. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
<td>$22.50</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Betterware de Mexico SAPI. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Betterware de Mexico SAPI compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Betterware de Mexico SAPI's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Capture valuable insights into Betterware de Mexico SAPI's market standing by understanding these analyst evaluations alongside pertinent financial indicators. Stay informed and make strategic decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BWMX/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Betterware de Mexico SAPI analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Discovering Betterware de Mexico SAPI: A Closer Look</h2>
Betterware de Mexico SAPI de CV is a direct-to-consumer selling company. The company operates through two business segments: the home organization products (Betterware segment or BWM segment) and the beauty and personal care products (B and PC) (JAFRA segment). The Betterware's segment is divided into different categories based on the type of products it sells and includes, kitchen and food preservation, home solutions, bathroom, laundry &amp; cleaning, tech and mobility, and bedroom and wellness products. The JAFRA's segment is divided into fragrance, color, skincare, and toiletries products. The company generates a majority of its revenue from the Beauty and personal care (B&amp;PC) (JAFRA segment). Geographically, key revenue for the company is derived from Mexico.
<h3>A Deep Dive into Betterware de Mexico SAPI's Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company exhibits a lower market capitalization profile, positioning itself below industry averages. This suggests a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Betterware de Mexico SAPI's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 31 March, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately 10.36%. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Betterware de Mexico SAPI's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 8.16% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): Betterware de Mexico SAPI's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 19.7%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): Betterware de Mexico SAPI's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 2.68%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 3.6, Betterware de Mexico SAPI adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

BWMX

Critical Insights From Betterware de Mexico SAPI Analyst Ratings: What You Need To Know

Canaccord Genuity analyst Dalton Baretto maintains MAG Silver (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MAG#TSX">MAG</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from C$22 to C$23.

TSX:MAG

Canaccord Genuity Maintains Buy on MAG Silver, Raises Price Target to C$23

Canaccord Genuity analyst Mike Mueller maintains Baytex Energy (TSX:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BTE#TSX">BTE</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from C$6.25 to C$6.5.

TSX:BTE

Canaccord Genuity Maintains Buy on Baytex Energy, Raises Price Target to C$6.5

First Cap (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FCAP#NASDAQ">FCAP</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.85 per share. This is a 3.66 percent increase over earnings of $0.82 per share from the same period last year.

Earnings

FCAP

First Cap Q2 EPS $0.85 Up From $0.82 YoY

Asset Sales

Johnson Controls International: Purchase Deal Says Robert Bosch Will Pay Co Termination Fee Of $300M If Purchase Agreement Is Terminated

PayPal Holdings's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PYPL#NYSE">PYPL</a>) short percent of float has fallen 4.83% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 20.55 million shares sold short, which is 1.97% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.04 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>PayPal Holdings Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722026721_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for PayPal Holdings has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing PayPal Holdings's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, PayPal Holdings's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 5.82%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

PYPL

How Is The Market Feeling About PayPal Holdings?

Owens-Corning's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OC#NYSE">OC</a>) short percent of float has risen 10.34% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 1.49 million shares sold short, which is 2.24% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.27 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Owens-Corning Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722026716_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Owens-Corning has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Owens-Corning's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Owens-Corning's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.00%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Looking Into Owens-Corning's Recent Short Interest

Kohl's's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KSS#NYSE">KSS</a>) short percent of float has risen 4.82% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 40.73 million shares sold short, which is 51.14% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 8.49 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Kohl's Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1722026711_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Kohl's has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Kohl's's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Kohl's's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.12%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

(KSS) - Analyzing Kohl's's Short Interest

<a href="https://www.ft.com/content/d67a6325-d316-4bb8-80e3-1d51429b3393">https://www.ft.com/content/d67a6325-d316-4bb8-80e3-1d51429b3393</a>
Howard Schultz, the former Starbucks chief executive, is opposing a potential settlement between the company and activist investor Elliott Investment Management, in the latest sign of tension at the world's largest coffee chain. The quasi-founder of Starbucks has made his opposition to an Elliott settlement known to some board members, said people familiar with the matter. Schultz had criticised its leadership publicly in recent months despite no longer having a formal role at the company. He remains Starbucks's sixth-largest shareholder, with a holding of about $1.6bn. Elliott, known for being an aggressive investor, has built a sizeable minority stake in the $86bn company and has privately pushed for change in recent weeks, including board representation, in an attempt to revive Starbucks' lacklustre performance. Schultz and Elliott have not been in contact over this matter, one person said. Companies under pressure from activists such as Elliott often seek to negotiate agreements with them rather than face a public fight, but the status of any settlement discussions between Starbucks and Elliott remain unclear. "Howard left the board a year ago and in his limited contact with the board since, his input has always focused on the values and culture of Starbucks as the primary driver of success and performance," a person close to Schultz said. The billionaire former coffee machine salesman led the company three separate times — for about 14 years starting in 1986, then again from 2008 to 2017, and most recently as interim CEO from 2022 to 2023.&nbsp; He was succeeded as CEO last year by Laxman Narasimhan, who joined from UK-based consumer health and hygiene group Reckitt. Schultz remains chair emeritus but left the company's board and has said he does not have access to financial information.
 Schultz, who has said he has no interest in returning as CEO, has remained vocal on the sidelines. This spring he criticised the company's performance on LinkedIn, penning an open letter that said senior leaders and board members needed "to spend more time with those who wear the green apron". He also made an appearance on business podcast Acquired in June, speaking about the history of Starbucks and his recommendations for management. "It hasn't been a great year for Starbucks," he said. "In fairness to Laxman, there's a lot of external issues that have contributed to the pressure, like on every company. But the company has not executed the way that I think it should have." "If the company is doing a drift towards mediocrity, I hold leadership, and the board responsible for that," he said later in the three-hour podcast. Starbucks's share price has fallen about 20 per cent since the start of 2024. The company cut its financial guidance in January and again in April, when it reported a 4 per cent decline in quarterly comparable store sales that was the first such drop since late 2020. It is due to announce results for its fiscal third quarter on Tuesday. Starbucks has made changes to its board over the past year. Three new members, including the CEOs of YouTube and T-Mobile, Neal Mohan and Mike Sievert, joined earlier this year. This spring, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella left the board. Spokespeople for Schultz, Starbucks and Elliott declined to comment.

Legal

Management

SBUX

'Howard Schultz Opposes Starbucks Settlement With Activist Investor Elliott' - Financial Times

Offerings

ALRN

Aileron Therapeutics Got Into Equity Distribution Agreement, May Offer & Sell Shares Of Our Common Stock From Time To Time Of Up To $50M

WIIM

VTVT

vTv Therapeutics shares are trading lower after the company announced the FDA has placed a clinical hold on the cadisegliatin clinical program which includes the ongoing CATT1 phase 3 trial in type 1 diabetes.

vTv Therapeutics Shares Resume Trade

Paragon Technologies, Inc. ("Paragon"), a diversified holding company and a large shareholder of Ocean Power Technologies, Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OPTT#NYSE">OPTT</a>), ("Company" or "OPT"), issues the following statement to OPT shareholders:
On July 5, OPT filed a proxy statement calling for a special meeting of shareholders on August 30, 2024, asking shareholders to approve increasing the Company's authorized shares to 200 million, up from 100 million.
On July 25, 2025, OPT announced Fiscal 2024 financial results revealing that it lost $27.4 million in fiscal 2024 versus $26.3 million in fiscal 2023.

OPTT

PGNT

Paragon Technologies Recommends Ocean Power Shareholders Vote AGAINST Its Plan To Increase Its Authorized Shares By 100M

Aalberts N.V.: A Great Dividend Growth Stock At An Attractive Price

Aalberts N.V. reports results

Tweedy, Browne Fund Q4 2023 Commentary

Aalberts N.V. GAAP EPS of €3.38, revenue of €3.32B

Aalberts N.V. 2023 Q4 - Results - Earnings Call Presentation

Aalberts N.V. (AALBF) Q4 2023 Earnings Call Transcript

Jefferies analyst David Kerstens maintained a Buy rating on Aalberts Industries N.V. (0NX1 – Research Report) yesterday and set a price target of €...

Aalberts Industries N.V. (0NX1) Gets a Buy from Jefferies

Aalberts Industries N.V. (GB:0NX1) has released an update. Aalberts Industries N.V. reported a resilient financial performance amidst market challe...

Aalberts Industries Maintains Profitability in Tough Market

Aalberts N.V. reports 1H results

Aalberts N.V. (AALBF) First Half 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

AALBF

ABLGF

BACRP

BAESF

BAESY

BAIDF

BIDU

BNTGF

BNTGY

COCSF

DGEAF

DHLGY

DNTUF

DNTUY

DPSTF

FSNUF

FSNUY

HAIIF

HLPPF

HLPPY

IONS

KOYJF

LSDAF

NSRGF

NSRGY

NVSEF

RHHBF

RHHBY

RHHVF

SAFRF

SAFRY

SCRYY

SZCRF

TBABF

TBABY

TLPFF

TLPFY

TTFNF

UBSFF

UBSFY

UHAL

VRTX

WFCNP

Aalberts

&nbsp;

<h2>Upgrades</h2>

<ul>
	<li>According to Wolfe Research, the prior rating for Fisker Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/FSR#NYSE">FSR</a>) was changed from Underperform to Peer Perform. In the fourth quarter, Fisker earned $0.05. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $31.96 and a 52-week-low of $14.32. Fisker closed at $28.16 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
	<li>According to Piper Sandler, the prior rating for Farmers National Banc Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/FMNB#NASDAQ">FMNB</a>) was changed from Neutral to Overweight. Farmers National Banc earned $0.45 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.35 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $15.43 and a 52-week-low of $9.82. At the end of the last trading period, Farmers National Banc closed at $14.29.</li>
	<li>For Itron Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ITRI#NASDAQ">ITRI</a>), Argus Research upgraded the previous rating of Hold to Buy. For the fourth quarter, Itron had an EPS of $0.65, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.72. The stock has a 52-week-high of $120.80 and a 52-week-low of $40.48. At the end of the last trading period, Itron closed at $117.75.</li>
	<li>According to Baird, the prior rating for WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/WSC#NASDAQ">WSC</a>) was changed from Neutral to Outperform. The current stock performance of WillScot Mobile Mini shows a 52-week-high of $28.71 and a 52-week-low of $7.45. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $27.20.</li>
	<li>According to Raymond James, the prior rating for Iridium Communications Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/IRDM#NASDAQ">IRDM</a>) was changed from Market Perform to Outperform. For the fourth quarter, Iridium Communications had an EPS of $0.06, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.82. The stock has a 52-week-high of $54.65 and a 52-week-low of $16.87. At the end of the last trading period, Iridium Communications closed at $39.47.</li>
	<li>According to Loop Capital, the prior rating for 3D Systems Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/DDD#NYSE">DDD</a>) was changed from Sell to Hold. In the fourth quarter, 3D Sys showed an EPS of $0.09, compared to $0.05 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $56.50 and a 52-week-low of $4.60. At the end of the last trading period, 3D Sys closed at $31.14.</li>
	<li>For Eaton Corp PLC (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ETN#NYSE">ETN</a>), Morgan Stanley upgraded the previous rating of Equal-Weight to Overweight. In the fourth quarter, Eaton Corp showed an EPS of $1.28, compared to $1.37 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Eaton Corp shows a 52-week-high of $135.84 and a 52-week-low of $56.41. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $133.92.</li>
	<li>Goldman Sachs upgraded the previous rating for Alcoa Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/AA#NYSE">AA</a>) from Sell to Buy. For the fourth quarter, Alcoa had an EPS of $0.26, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.31. The current stock performance of Alcoa shows a 52-week-high of $27.86 and a 52-week-low of $5.16. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $27.50.</li>
	<li>For Rapid7 Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/RPD#NASDAQ">RPD</a>), Piper Sandler upgraded the previous rating of Neutral to Overweight. For the fourth quarter, Rapid7 had an EPS of $0.07, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.03. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $94.60 and a 52-week-low of $31.34. Rapid7 closed at $78.99 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
	<li>According to JP Morgan, the prior rating for Casa Systems Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/CASA#NASDAQ">CASA</a>) was changed from Underweight to Neutral. Casa Systems earned $0.27 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.15 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $13.15 and a 52-week-low of $1.85. Casa Systems closed at $8.02 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
	<li>JP Morgan upgraded the previous rating for Sensata Technologies Holding PLC (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ST#NYSE">ST</a>) from Neutral to Overweight. For the fourth quarter, Sensata Technologies had an EPS of $0.85, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.89. The current stock performance of Sensata Technologies shows a 52-week-high of $61.64 and a 52-week-low of $18.25. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $59.68.</li>
	<li>According to KeyBanc, the prior rating for Roku Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ROKU#NASDAQ">ROKU</a>) was changed from Sector Weight to Overweight. Roku earned $0.49 in the fourth quarter, compared to $0.13 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $486.72 and a 52-week-low of $58.22. Roku closed at $389.67 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">See all analyst ratings upgrades.</a>

&nbsp;

<h2>Downgrades</h2>

<ul>
	<li>For Camden Property Trust (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/CPT#NYSE">CPT</a>), ScotiaBank downgraded the previous rating of Outperform to Sector Perform. In the fourth quarter, Camden Prop Trust showed an EPS of $1.00, compared to $1.04 from the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $115.03 and a 52-week-low of $62.48. Camden Prop Trust closed at $103.69 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
	<li>According to HC Wainwright &amp; Co., the prior rating for Kopin Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/KOPN#NASDAQ">KOPN</a>) was changed from Buy to Neutral. For the fourth quarter, Kopin had an EPS of $0.02, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.09. The current stock performance of Kopin shows a 52-week-high of $13.62 and a 52-week-low of $0.19. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $9.91.</li>
	<li>For Adaptive Biotechnologies Corp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ADPT#NASDAQ">ADPT</a>), Goldman Sachs downgraded the previous rating of Buy to Neutral. For the fourth quarter, Adaptive Biotechnologies had an EPS of $0.33, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.17. The current stock performance of Adaptive Biotechnologies shows a 52-week-high of $71.25 and a 52-week-low of $15.19. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $53.11.</li>
	<li>Mizuho downgraded the previous rating for Black Hills Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/BKH#NYSE">BKH</a>) from Buy to Neutral. In the fourth quarter, Black Hills showed an EPS of $1.23, compared to $1.13 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Black Hills shows a 52-week-high of $81.43 and a 52-week-low of $48.07. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $59.94.</li>
	<li>According to Goldman Sachs, the prior rating for Owens-Corning Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/OC#NYSE">OC</a>) was changed from Buy to Sell. Owens-Corning earned $1.90 in the fourth quarter, compared to $1.13 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Owens-Corning shows a 52-week-high of $87.89 and a 52-week-low of $28.56. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $83.09.</li>
	<li>According to RBC Capital, the prior rating for Rocket Companies Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/RKT#NYSE">RKT</a>) was changed from Outperform to Sector Perform. Rocket Companies earned $1.14 in the fourth quarter. The current stock performance of Rocket Companies shows a 52-week-high of $43.00 and a 52-week-low of $17.78. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $41.60.</li>
	<li>According to Piper Sandler, the prior rating for KeyCorp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/KEY#NYSE">KEY</a>) was changed from Overweight to Neutral. In the fourth quarter, KeyCorp showed an EPS of $0.56, compared to $0.48 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $21.81 and a 52-week-low of $7.45. At the end of the last trading period, KeyCorp closed at $20.64.</li>
	<li>Berenberg downgraded the previous rating for LivaNova PLC (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/LIVN#NASDAQ">LIVN</a>) from Buy to Hold. For the fourth quarter, LivaNova had an EPS of $0.71, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $1.00. The current stock performance of LivaNova shows a 52-week-high of $79.98 and a 52-week-low of $33.40. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $76.23.</li>
	<li>For Prudential Financial Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/PRU#NYSE">PRU</a>), JP Morgan downgraded the previous rating of Overweight to Neutral. Prudential Financial earned $2.93 in the fourth quarter, compared to $2.33 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Prudential Financial shows a 52-week-high of $91.61 and a 52-week-low of $38.62. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $88.94.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">See all analyst ratings downgrades.</a>

&nbsp;

<h2>Initiations</h2>

<ul>
	<li>JonesTrading initiated coverage on Equillium Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/EQ#NASDAQ">EQ</a>) with a Buy rating. The price target for Equillium is set to $14.00. For the third quarter, Equillium had an EPS of $0.31, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.35. The current stock performance of Equillium shows a 52-week-high of $27.05 and a 52-week-low of $2.20. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $7.20.</li>
	<li>With a Buy rating, Jefferies initiated coverage on Gemini Therapeutics Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/GMTX#NASDAQ">GMTX</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $23.00 for Gemini Therapeutics. The stock has a 52-week-high of $16.64 and a 52-week-low of $11.06. At the end of the last trading period, Gemini Therapeutics closed at $16.01.</li>
	<li>With an Outperform rating, Bernstein initiated coverage on NextEra Energy Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/NEE#NYSE">NEE</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $88.00 for NextEra Energy. In the fourth quarter, NextEra Energy showed an EPS of $0.40, compared to $1.44 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $1232.24 and a 52-week-low of $71.94. At the end of the last trading period, NextEra Energy closed at $75.56.</li>
	<li>For Resideo Technologies Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/REZI#NYSE">REZI</a>), William Blair initiated coverage, by setting the current rating at Market Perform. In the fourth quarter, Resideo Technologies showed an EPS of $0.44, compared to $0.39 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $29.48 and a 52-week-low of $3.72. At the end of the last trading period, Resideo Technologies closed at $25.81.</li>
	<li>With an Outperform rating, Evercore ISI Group initiated coverage on Vor Biopharma Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/VOR#NASDAQ">VOR</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $48.00 for Vor Biopharma. The current stock performance of Vor Biopharma shows a 52-week-high of $63.62 and a 52-week-low of $25.32. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $42.59.</li>
	<li>Barclays initiated coverage on Danaher Corp (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/DHR#NYSE">DHR</a>) with an Overweight rating. The price target for Danaher is set to $260.00. Danaher earned $2.08 in the fourth quarter, compared to $1.28 in the year-ago quarter. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $248.86 and a 52-week-low of $119.60. Danaher closed at $223.93 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
	<li>Oppenheimer initiated coverage on ChargePoint Holdings Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/CHPT#NYSE">CHPT</a>) with an Outperform rating. The price target for ChargePoint Holdings is set to $39.00. The current stock performance of ChargePoint Holdings shows a 52-week-high of $33.35 and a 52-week-low of $28.00. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $28.57.</li>
	<li>Barclays initiated coverage on Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/TMO#NYSE">TMO</a>) with an Overweight rating. The price target for Thermo Fisher Scientific is set to $525.00. In the fourth quarter, Thermo Fisher Scientific showed an EPS of $7.09, compared to $3.55 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Thermo Fisher Scientific shows a 52-week-high of $532.57 and a 52-week-low of $250.21. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $463.20.</li>
	<li>With a Equal-Weight rating, Barclays initiated coverage on Syneos Health Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/SYNH#NASDAQ">SYNH</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $84.00 for Syneos Health. In the fourth quarter, Syneos Health showed an EPS of $1.11, compared to $1.03 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Syneos Health shows a 52-week-high of $81.35 and a 52-week-low of $30.02. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $75.50.</li>
	<li>Barclays initiated coverage on PPD Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/PPD#NASDAQ">PPD</a>) with an Overweight rating. The price target for PPD is set to $42.00. For the fourth quarter, PPD had an EPS of $0.39, compared to year-ago quarter EPS of $0.33. The current stock performance of PPD shows a 52-week-high of $38.76 and a 52-week-low of $10.61. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $35.99.</li>
	<li>With an Overweight rating, Barclays initiated coverage on Sotera Health Co (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/SHC#NASDAQ">SHC</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $35.00 for Sotera Health. The current stock performance of Sotera Health shows a 52-week-high of $28.62 and a 52-week-low of $24.36. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $26.56.</li>
	<li>Barclays initiated coverage on Ortho Clinical Diagnostics Holdings PLC (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/OCDX#NASDAQ">OCDX</a>) with an Overweight rating. The price target for Ortho Clinical Diagnostic is set to $24.00. At the moment, the stock has a 52-week-high of $18.65 and a 52-week-low of $15.14. Ortho Clinical Diagnostic closed at $17.57 at the end of the last trading period.</li>
	<li>Barclays initiated coverage on IQVIA Holdings Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/IQV#NYSE">IQV</a>) with an Overweight rating. The price target for IQVIA Holdings is set to $220.00. IQVIA Holdings earned $2.11 in the fourth quarter, compared to $1.74 in the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $199.99 and a 52-week-low of $81.79. At the end of the last trading period, IQVIA Holdings closed at $192.65.</li>
	<li>With a Equal-Weight rating, Barclays initiated coverage on Icon PLC (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ICLR#NASDAQ">ICLR</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $200.00 for Icon. Icon earned $1.90 in the fourth quarter, compared to $1.83 in the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Icon shows a 52-week-high of $223.62 and a 52-week-low of $104.28. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $171.87.</li>
	<li>With an Overweight rating, Barclays initiated coverage on Certara Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/CERT#NASDAQ">CERT</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $40.00 for Certara. The current stock performance of Certara shows a 52-week-high of $41.79 and a 52-week-low of $29.70. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $35.49.</li>
	<li>Needham initiated coverage on CuriosityStream Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/CURI#NASDAQ">CURI</a>) with a Buy rating. The price target for CuriosityStream is set to $25.00. Interestingly, in the third quarter, CuriosityStream&#39;s EPS was $0.56. The current stock performance of CuriosityStream shows a 52-week-high of $24.00 and a 52-week-low of $7.44. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $18.63.</li>
	<li>With an Overweight rating, Barclays initiated coverage on Avantor Inc (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/AVTR#NYSE">AVTR</a>). The price target seems to have been set at $33.00 for Avantor. In the fourth quarter, Avantor showed an EPS of $0.29, compared to $0.19 from the year-ago quarter. The stock has a 52-week-high of $31.05 and a 52-week-low of $6.66. At the end of the last trading period, Avantor closed at $28.74.</li>
	<li>Barclays initiated coverage on Illumina Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ILMN#NASDAQ">ILMN</a>) with an Underweight rating. The price target for Illumina is set to $325.00. In the fourth quarter, Illumina showed an EPS of $1.22, compared to $1.70 from the year-ago quarter. The current stock performance of Illumina shows a 52-week-high of $555.77 and a 52-week-low of $196.78. Moreover, at the end of the last trading period, the closing price was at $441.01.</li>
	<li>KeyBanc initiated coverage on OneWater Marine Inc (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/ONEW#NASDAQ">ONEW</a>) with an Overweight rating. The price target for OneWater Marine is set to $43.00. Interestingly, in the first quarter, OneWater Marine&#39;s EPS was $0.71. The stock has a 52-week-high of $38.71 and a 52-week-low of $3.41. At the end of the last trading period, OneWater Marine closed at $37.24.</li>
</ul>

<a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/blog/how-to-understand-option-alerts/">See all analyst ratings initiations.</a>

Upgrades

Downgrades

Initiation

Intraday Update

ADPT

AVTR

CASA

CERT

CHPT

CTTAY

CURI

EURMF

FFBC

FMNB

GMTX

ICLR

ILMN

IRDM

ITRI

JBAXY

JMPLY

KOPN

LIVN

LNEGY

OCDX

ONEW

REZI

RNLSY

ROKU

SCTBF

SGPYY

SNMSF

SYNH

Benzinga's Top Ratings Upgrades, Downgrades For March 3, 2021

Kepler Cheuvreux analyst Peter Olofsen downgrades Aalberts (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="/stock/AALBF#OTC">AALBF</a>) from Buy to Hold.

Kepler Cheuvreux Downgrades Aalberts to Hold

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Comments

Aalberts

News

Latest news for Aalberts (OTC:AALBF) Stock

Wednesday, March 03, 2021