Would You Let A Robot Do These Jobs?

The findings may be of interest to companies interested in robotics, namely Alphabet Inc GOOG GOOGL, Northrop Grumman Corporation NOC, Intuitive Surgical, Inc. ISRG and others.

Following its attendance at Automate, a robotics trade show in Chicago focused on manufacturing and fulfillment, Loup Ventures explored the possibility and feasibility of deploying these robots for different jobs.

The Survey

Analyst Doug Clinton expressed optimism regarding much of human jobs being replaced by robots over the next few years. To deduce how comfortable consumers are in allowing robots to do certain jobs, the analyst surveyed 500 consumers in the United States, asking them to rate their comfort level with robots performing 12 specific tasks on a scale of 1–5, 1 being extremely uncomfortable, 3 being neutral and 5 being extremely comfortable.

Loup Ventures had categorized the jobs as:

• Time-consuming chores.
• Transportation.
• Personal/family livelihood.
• Professional services.

Time Consuming Chores: Robot's Forte

The survey found that consumers were generally comfortable getting time-consuming chores such as vacuuming, mowing the lawn or preparing food done by robots. The firm said this category of job was most positively viewed, reasoning that the downside is limited if the job is not performed well. Older millennials expressed the highest level of comfort, while the young millennials, belonging to the 18–29 age group saw the least benefit, a corollary of the latter being fully involved with it.

Mixed On Transportation Jobs

With respect to transportation, the survey by Loup Ventures showed that the respondents were less comfortable with robots manning a car or piloting a plane rather than with controlling a subway or train ride. This could be explained by the likelihood of major car accident or downed plane being high than encountering a catastrophic subway accident.

Generation X, individuals aged 40–59, was the most uncomfortable with robots engaged in transportation, which can be explained by their risk averse upbringings and the presence of young or teenage children.

Risks Outweigh Benefits On Personal Jobs

Consumers expressed extreme discomfort with respect to robots taking care of personal/family livelihood. The discomfort stems from downside risk associated with a robotic failure being very apparent in jobs like performing surgery or babysitting. Noteworthy is the fact that the high levels of discomfort are apparent across all demographics. In an interesting statistic, robo-babysitters were more negatively viewed than robo-surgeons, as babysitting needs empathy, creating and community. On these three counts, humans are at an advantage over the robots.

Financial Loss A Sticky Issue In Professional Services

The comfort level dwindled when consumers were probed as to whether they would be comfortable vesting robots with the responsibility of performing professional services, except for personal training. Professional services such as taking care of taxes and legal services, though not carrying mortal risk, costs the consumers financially if done badly. That said the 18–29 age group was the most comfortable using robo-accountants or robo-lawyers.

Concluding, Loup Ventures said the automated future Man envisions requires building trust between consumers and robots, especially with tasks perceived as dangerous. "As humans come to accept that robots can perform almost all 'dangerous' tasks with greater safety than humans, the associated comfort levels should rise," the firm said.

Rise Of The Machines: BlackRock Turns To Robots To Pick Stocks Surrender Your Desk: It's Time To Let The Robots Take Over