JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ARCA: JPEM)

Latest News for JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ARCA:JPEM)

JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Long Ideas

News

Broad U.S. Equity ETFs

Specialty ETFs

Commodities

Markets

Trading Ideas

ETFs

ETFC

JPEM

Rydex ETF Trust Rydex S&P Equal Weight ETF

SGOL

SIVR

JPME

E*Trade Adds More Commission-Free ETFs

New ETFs

Intraday Update

JPGE

JPIN

J.P. Morgan Debuts Its Fourth ETF

<p>Benchmark  analyst Robert Wasserman   reiterates Intensity Therapeutics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/INTS#NASDAQ">INTS</a>) with a Speculative Buy and maintains $12 price target.</p>


Price Target

Reiteration

Analyst Ratings

INTS

Benchmark Reiterates Speculative Buy on Intensity Therapeutics, Maintains $12 Price Target

<p>In the last three months, 5 analysts have published ratings on Dragonfly Energy Hldgs (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DFLI#NASDAQ">DFLI</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>In the table below, you'll find a summary of their recent ratings, revealing the shifting sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the previous months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $1.62, a high estimate of $3.00, and a low estimate of $0.90. Observing a 5.19% increase, the current average has risen from the previous average price target of $1.54. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868067_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
<p>The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Dragonfly Energy Hldgs by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Vincent Anderson</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$1.20</td>
<td>$1.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chip Moore</td>
<td>Roth MKM</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$1.50</td>
<td>$0.90</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>George Gianarikas</td>
<td>Canaccord Genuity</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$1.50</td>
<td>$1.25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Dobson</td>
<td>Chardan Capital</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$3.00</td>
<td>$3.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chip Moore</td>
<td>Roth MKM</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$0.90</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Dragonfly Energy Hldgs. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Dragonfly Energy Hldgs compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
<p>Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Dragonfly Energy Hldgs's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/DFLI/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights"><strong>Stay up to date on Dragonfly Energy Hldgs analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<p>If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.</p>
<h2>Unveiling the Story Behind Dragonfly Energy Hldgs</h2>
<p>Dragonfly Energy Holdings Corp is a manufacturer of non-toxic deep cycle lithium-ion batteries that are designed to displace lead acid batteries in a number of different storage applications and end markets including RV, marine vessel, and solar and off-grid industries, with disruptive solid-state cell technology currently under development. The company's deep cycle lithium iron phosphate ("LFP") batteries provide numerous advantages compared to incumbent products, such as lead-acid batteries. LFP batteries are non-toxic and environmentally friendly, do not rely on scarce or controversial metals, and are a highly cost-effective storage solution.</p>
<h3>Dragonfly Energy Hldgs's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.</p>
<p><strong>Negative Revenue Trend:</strong> Examining Dragonfly Energy Hldgs's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a decline of approximately <strong>-48.35%</strong> in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Industrials sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> Dragonfly Energy Hldgs's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional net margin, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable net margin of <strong>28.88%,</strong> the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost management.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Dragonfly Energy Hldgs's ROE surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive <strong>11.54%</strong> ROE, the company effectively utilizes shareholder equity capital.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Dragonfly Energy Hldgs's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching <strong>3.82%</strong>. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of <strong>0.84</strong>, caution is advised due to increased financial risk.</p>
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
<p>Analysts are specialists within banking and financial systems that typically report for specific stocks or within defined sectors. These people research company financial statements, sit in conference calls and meetings, and speak with relevant insiders to determine what are known as analyst ratings for stocks. Typically, analysts will rate each stock once a quarter. </p>
<p>Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


DFLI

Demystifying Dragonfly Energy Hldgs: Insights From 5 Analyst Reviews

<p>Scotiabank  analyst Greg McGinniss   maintains Rexford Industrial Realty (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/REXR#NYSE">REXR</a>) with a Sector Outperform and lowers the price target from $55 to $51.</p>


REXR

Scotiabank Maintains Sector Outperform on Rexford Industrial Realty, Lowers Price Target to $51

Macro Economic Events

Global

Economics

U.S. To Favor Long-Standing Investors For Venezuela Oil Licenses Over Newcomers, Say Sources

<p>In the preceding three months, 5 analysts have released ratings for Cirrus Logic (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CRUS#NASDAQ">CRUS</a>), presenting a wide array of perspectives from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $115.0, a high estimate of $120.00, and a low estimate of $110.00. This upward trend is apparent, with the current average reflecting a 16.16% increase from the previous average price target of $99.00.</p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868055_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
<p>A comprehensive examination of how financial experts perceive Cirrus Logic is derived from recent analyst actions. The following is a detailed summary of key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Blayne Curtis</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Vinh</td>
<td>Keybanc</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Matthew Ramsay</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$115.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tore Svanberg</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Christopher Rolland</td>
<td>Susquehanna</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Positive</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$100.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Cirrus Logic. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Providing a comprehensive analysis, analysts offer qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Cirrus Logic compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Cirrus Logic's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
<p>Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of Cirrus Logic's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/CRUS/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights"><strong>Stay up to date on Cirrus Logic analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>About Cirrus Logic</h2>
<p>Cirrus Logic Inc is a provider of integrated circuits for audio and voice signal processing applications. The firm's products are organized into two streams: portable audio products, and non-portable audio and other products. These products include analog and mixed-signal components targeting mobile devices, smart homes, and applications in the automotive, energy, and industrial markets. Roughly half of the firm's revenue is generated in China, with the rest coming from the United States, Europe, South Korea, and countries across the world.</p>
<h3>Cirrus Logic: A Financial Overview</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Negative Revenue Trend:</strong> Examining Cirrus Logic's financials over 3 months reveals challenges. As of 31 March, 2024, the company experienced a decline of approximately <strong>-39.93%</strong> in revenue growth, reflecting a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Information Technology sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of <strong>12.06%,</strong> the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Cirrus Logic's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of <strong>2.48%</strong>, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Cirrus Logic's ROA surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive <strong>2.02%</strong> ROA, the company effectively utilizes its assets for optimal returns.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> Cirrus Logic's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of <strong>0.09</strong>.</p>
<h2>The Significance of Analyst Ratings Explained</h2>
<p>Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.</p>
<p>Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


CRUS

Cracking The Code: Understanding Analyst Reviews For Cirrus Logic

<p>Throughout the last three months, 7 analysts have evaluated Gaming and Leisure Props (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GLPI#NASDAQ">GLPI</a>), offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>The table below offers a condensed view of their recent ratings, showcasing the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts provide deeper insights through their assessments of 12-month price targets, revealing an average target of $49.0, a high estimate of $53.00, and a low estimate of $46.00. A decline of 1.01% from the prior average price target is evident in the current average. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868043_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Diving into Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Exploration</h2>
<p>The standing of Gaming and Leisure Props among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Nicholas Yulico</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Perform</td>
<td>$48.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vikram Malhorta</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brad Heffern</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ronald Kamdem</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vikram Malhorta</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$47.00</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitch Germain</td>
<td>JMP Securities</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Outperform</td>
<td>$53.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brad Heffern</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$49.00</td>
<td>$50.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Gaming and Leisure Props. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Gaming and Leisure Props compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Gaming and Leisure Props's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
<p>Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Gaming and Leisure Props's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/GLPI/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights"><strong>Stay up to date on Gaming and Leisure Props analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Delving into Gaming and Leisure Props's Background</h2>
<p>Gaming and Leisure Properties Inc, or GLP, is a real estate investment property trust whose primary business consists of acquiring, financing, and owning real estate property to be leased to gaming operators in triple-net lease arrangements. The GLPI's portfolio consisted of interests in sixty one gaming and related facilities, the real property associated with thirty four gaming and related facilities operated by PENN, the real property associated with six gaming and related facilities operated by Caesars Entertainment Corporation.</p>
<h3>Unraveling the Financial Story of Gaming and Leisure Props</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization:</strong> Exceeding industry standards, the company's market capitalization places it above industry average in size relative to peers. This emphasizes its significant scale and robust market position.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Over the 3 months period, Gaming and Leisure Props showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of <strong>5.84%</strong> as of 31 March, 2024. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Real Estate sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of <strong>46.38%,</strong> the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Gaming and Leisure Props's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of <strong>4.21%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Gaming and Leisure Props's ROA excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching <strong>1.48%</strong>. This signifies efficient management of assets and strong financial health.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> Gaming and Leisure Props's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of <strong>1.67</strong>.</p>
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
<p>Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.</p>
<p>Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


GLPI

What Analysts Are Saying About Gaming and Leisure Props Stock

<p>Prologis (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PLD#NYSE">PLD</a>) has been analyzed by 14 analysts in the last three months, revealing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">6</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts have recently evaluated Prologis and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $128.36, accompanied by a high estimate of $141.00 and a low estimate of $112.00. A 10.63% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $143.62. </p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868036_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Decoding Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Look</h2>
<p>The standing of Prologis among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Nicholas Yulico</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sector Outperform</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>$149.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Carroll</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$124.00</td>
<td>$145.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>David Rodgers</td>
<td>Baird</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$117.00</td>
<td>$137.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Powell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$123.00</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Mueller</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$128.00</td>
<td>$143.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Marie Ferguson</td>
<td>Argus Research</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$139.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Caitlin Burrows</td>
<td>Goldman Sachs</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$140.00</td>
<td>$163.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Kim</td>
<td>BMO Capital</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$112.00</td>
<td>$145.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brent Dilts</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$138.00</td>
<td>$151.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steve Sakwa</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>In-Line</td>
<td>$123.00</td>
<td>$136.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brendan Lynch</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$135.00</td>
<td>$141.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vikram Malhotra</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anthony Powell</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$141.00</td>
<td>$153.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Steve Sakwa</td>
<td>Evercore ISI Group</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>In-Line</td>
<td>$136.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Prologis. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of Prologis compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Prologis's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
<p>Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Prologis's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/PLD/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights"><strong>Stay up to date on Prologis analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>Discovering Prologis: A Closer Look</h2>
<p>Prologis was formed by the June 2011 merger of AMB Property and Prologis Trust. The company develops, acquires, and operates around 1.2 billion square feet of high-quality industrial and logistics facilities across the globe. The company also has a strategic capital business segment that has around $60 billion of third-party AUM. The company is organized into four global divisions (Americas, Europe, Asia, and other Americas) and operates as a real estate investment trust.</p>
<h3>Breaking Down Prologis's Financial Performance</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> Above industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization emphasizes a noteworthy size, indicative of a strong market presence.</p>
<p><strong>Positive Revenue Trend:</strong> Examining Prologis's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of <strong>10.63%</strong> as of 31 March, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Real Estate sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> Prologis's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of <strong>29.86%,</strong> the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Prologis's ROE stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROE of <strong>1.1%</strong>, the company demonstrates effective use of equity capital and strong financial performance.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Prologis's ROA is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of <strong>0.63%,</strong> the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns from its assets.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> Prologis's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of <strong>0.56</strong>.</p>
<h2>Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings</h2>
<p>Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter.</p>
<p>Analysts may supplement their ratings with predictions for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, offering investors a more comprehensive outlook. However, investors should be mindful that analysts, like any human, can have subjective perspectives influencing their forecasts.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


14 Analysts Assess Prologis: What You Need To Know

<p>Benchmark  analyst Mike Hickey   reiterates Medicine Man Technologies (OTC:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SHWZ#OTC">SHWZ</a>) with a Buy and maintains $2.5 price target.</p>


SHWZ

Benchmark Reiterates Buy on Medicine Man Technologies, Maintains $2.5 Price Target

<p>Analysts' ratings for Healthpeak Properties (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DOC#NYSE">DOC</a>) over the last quarter vary from bullish to bearish, as provided by 7 analysts.</p>
<p>The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts have recently evaluated Healthpeak Properties and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $21.86, accompanied by a high estimate of $25.00 and a low estimate of $19.00. Witnessing a positive shift, the current average has risen by 9.3% from the previous average price target of $20.00.</p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868023_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Interpreting Analyst Ratings: A Closer Look</h2>
<p>In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive Healthpeak Properties. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Nicholas Yulico</td>
<td>Scotiabank</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Sector Outperform</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Mueller</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vikram Malhotra</td>
<td>Mizuho</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Carroll</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$22.00</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joshua Dennerlein</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$25.00</td>
<td>$18.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Connor Siversky</td>
<td>Wells Fargo</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$19.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Carroll</td>
<td>RBC Capital</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$21.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Healthpeak Properties. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Healthpeak Properties compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts explore the dynamics of price targets, providing estimates for the future value of Healthpeak Properties's stock. This examination reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
<p>To gain a panoramic view of Healthpeak Properties's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/DOC/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights"><strong>Stay up to date on Healthpeak Properties analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>About Healthpeak Properties</h2>
<p>Healthpeak owns a diversified healthcare portfolio of approximately 459 in-place properties spread across mainly medical office and life science assets, plus a handful of senior housing, hospital, and skilled nursing/post-acute care assets, as well.</p>
<h3>Healthpeak Properties's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> Above industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization emphasizes a noteworthy size, indicative of a strong market presence.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Over the 3 months period, Healthpeak Properties showcased positive performance, achieving a revenue growth rate of <strong>15.65%</strong> as of 31 March, 2024. This reflects a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Real Estate sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> Healthpeak Properties's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of <strong>1.08%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Healthpeak Properties's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of <strong>0.08%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Healthpeak Properties's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of <strong>0.04%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of <strong>1.02</strong>, Healthpeak Properties adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.</p>
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
<p>Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.</p>
<p>Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.</p>
<p>Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


Cracking The Code: Understanding Analyst Reviews For Healthpeak Properties

<p>Sherwin-Williams (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SHW#NYSE">SHW</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 3.92% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 17.02%. Currently, Sherwin-Williams has a market capitalization of $80.09 billion. </p>
<p><strong>Buying $1000 In SHW:</strong> If an investor had bought $1000 of SHW stock 5 years ago, it would be worth <strong>$2,232.35</strong> today based on a price of $315.88 for SHW at the time of writing.</p>
<h3>Sherwin-Williams's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868022_0.png" alt="comp_fig" /></p>
<p>Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.</p>
<p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>


$1000 Invested In This Stock 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth $2,200 Today

<p>Super Micro Computer (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SMCI#NASDAQ">SMCI</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 27.06% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 39.69%. Currently, Super Micro Computer has a market capitalization of $55.95 billion. </p>
<p><strong>Buying $100 In SMCI:</strong> If an investor had bought $100 of SMCI stock 15 years ago, it would be worth <strong>$15,061.20</strong> today based on a price of $955.54 for SMCI at the time of writing.</p>
<h3>Super Micro Computer's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868017_0.png" alt="comp_fig" /></p>
<p>Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.</p>
<p><em>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</em></p>


SMCI

Here's How Much $100 Invested In Super Micro Computer 15 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

<p>A New York Times (NYT) article recently sparked a discussion on Reddit about whether the shift from traditional pensions to 401(k) plans was a mistake. The debate captured a range of opinions reflecting the complexities of retirement savings in the U.S.</p>
<p>The Reddit post highlighted key points from the NYT piece, noting that not all companies offer <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/what-is-a-401k">401(k)</a>s, which affects millions of private-sector employees. The post also noted that while 401(k)s are widely utilized, many people do not invest enough in them. According to the Alliance for Lifetime Income, as Americans retire in large numbers, <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/05/38793057/can-you-guess-how-many-retire-with-a-5-million-nest-egg">gaps in the retirement system</a> are becoming apparent.</p>
<p><strong>Don't Miss:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement —<a href="http://www.benzinga.com/money/smartasset"><strong> How do you compare</strong></a>?</strong></li>
<li><strong>Reddit user reveals his retirement account&#8217;s &#8220;hourly wage&#8221; —<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/retirement-hourly-wage"><strong> how much does your money really make per hour?</strong></a></strong></li>
</ul>
<p>Several users shared their perspectives. One user explained the historical context, stating that the 401(k) plans began in 1978, following a wave of corporate bankruptcies that influenced Congress to pass ERISA in 1974, establishing standards for pension benefits. This user suggested that the 401(k) was never meant to be the sole retirement plan but a supplement, due to its voluntary nature.</p>
<p>A different user expressed skepticism about 401(k)s, stating, "It&#8217;s only a mistake if you invested in it. It was never meant to be a retirement plan, it was a way for working-class people to get into the stock market." They advised seeking employment with pension benefits instead.</p>
<p>Recalling the foundational concept of 401(k)s, a user noted, "I was told that the original approach to 401(k)s in the 1980s was that it was a three-legged stool. You retired on a bit from a 401(k), a bit from a pension, and a bit from Social Security."&nbsp;</p>
<p>The conversation also touched on the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/financial-advisors/24/01/36800326/they-dont-have-a-clue-95-of-americans-struggle-with-financial-literacy-accord">issue of financial literacy</a>. One commenter argued, "The real issue is not the 401(k), it&#8217;s people who either don&#8217;t know or don&#8217;t have the</p>
<p>discipline to invest and save for the future."</p>
<p><strong>Trending: If the United States had access to<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/public-hys-avgamerican"><strong> </strong><strong>today&#8217;s high-yield savings accounts rates</strong></a> in 2015, it wouldn&#8217;t need to save another penny.</strong></p>
<p>Another comment highlighted the disparity between IRA and <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/financial-advisors/24/01/36745517/if-someone-has-a-500-000-401-k-and-plans-to-work-part-time-can-they-afford-to">401(k) contribution limits</a>, questioning why IRA contributions are significantly lower despite offering similar tax advantages. The user argued for equalizing the contribution limits to provide more flexibility in retirement planning suggesting, ‘just raise the IRA contribution limits to match 401(k).'</p>
<p>The discussion reflects a broader concern about the adequacy of 401(k) plans as the primary retirement-saving vehicle and whether they serve the best interests of all American workers, especially as the landscape of retirement and employment continues to evolve.</p>
<p>Whatever your stance on the 401(k) debate, it&#8217;s crucial to <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/fam">consult with a financial advisor</a> to develop a comprehensive retirement strategy tailored to your circumstances and goals. Remember, retirement planning is not a one-size-fits-all endeavor, and a professional can help you navigate the complexities and make informed decisions.</p>
<p><strong>Read Next:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>82% of Americans aren&#8217;t using<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/public-hys"><strong> </strong><strong>this government secured 5% passive income stream</strong></a>, are you one of them?</strong></li>
<li><strong>The recommended retirement savings amount is $550K, so<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/fam"><strong> why are so many Americans are falling short?</strong></a></strong></li>
</ul>


Personal Finance

Was The 401(k) A Mistake?' Here's What People On Social Media Think

<p>Throughout the last three months, 17 analysts have evaluated Dutch Bros (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BROS#NYSE">BROS</a>), offering a diverse set of opinions from bullish to bearish.</p>
<p>The following table summarizes their recent ratings, shedding light on the changing sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bullish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Indifferent</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Somewhat Bearish</strong></th>
<th style="text-align: right;"><strong>Bearish</strong></th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Total Ratings</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">7</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">8</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Last 30D</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>1M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>2M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>3M Ago</strong></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Analysts' evaluations of 12-month price targets offer additional insights, showcasing an average target of $36.35, with a high estimate of $46.00 and a low estimate of $30.00. Surpassing the previous average price target of $34.50, the current average has increased by 5.36%.</p>
<p><img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1715868012_0.png" alt="price target chart" /></p>
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
<p>The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Dutch Bros by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.</p>
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Nick Setyan</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
<td>$39.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Charles</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$46.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Bernstein</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$35.00</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick Setyan</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$39.00</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Charles</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Charles</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Charles</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick Setyan</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Charles</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gregory Francfort</td>
<td>Guggenheim</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Chris O'Cull</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick Setyan</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>John Ivankoe</td>
<td>JP Morgan</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$40.00</td>
<td>$34.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brian Mullan</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Bernstein</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Andrew Charles</td>
<td>TD Cowen</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nick Setyan</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li><strong>Action Taken:</strong> Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Dutch Bros. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li><strong>Rating:</strong> Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Dutch Bros compared to the broader market.</li>
<li><strong>Price Targets:</strong> Analysts navigate through adjustments in price targets, providing estimates for Dutch Bros's future value. Comparing current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
<p>For valuable insights into Dutch Bros's market performance, consider these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators. Stay well-informed and make prudent decisions using our Ratings Table.</p>
<p><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/BROS/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights"><strong>Stay up to date on Dutch Bros analyst ratings.</strong></a></p>
<h2>All You Need to Know About Dutch Bros</h2>
<p>Dutch Bros Inc is an operator and franchisor of drive-thru coffee shops that are focused on serving hand-crafted beverages. The company's hand-crafted beverage-focused lineup features hot and cold espresso-based beverages, cold brew coffee products, proprietary energy drinks, tea, lemonade, smoothies and other beverages. The company has two reportable operating segments company-operated shops and franchising and other.</p>
<h3>Dutch Bros: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
<p><strong>Market Capitalization Analysis:</strong> Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.</p>
<p><strong>Revenue Growth:</strong> Dutch Bros's revenue growth over a period of 3 months has been noteworthy. As of 31 March, 2024, the company achieved a revenue growth rate of approximately <strong>39.46%</strong>. This indicates a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.</p>
<p><strong>Net Margin:</strong> Dutch Bros's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive <strong>2.57%</strong> net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Equity (ROE):</strong> Dutch Bros's ROE falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently using equity capital. With an ROE of <strong>1.81%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns for shareholders.</p>
<p><strong>Return on Assets (ROA):</strong> Dutch Bros's ROA is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of <strong>0.37%,</strong> the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.</p>
<p><strong>Debt Management:</strong> With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of <strong>2.07</strong>, Dutch Bros adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.</p>
<h2>The Core of Analyst Ratings: What Every Investor Should Know</h2>
<p>Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.</p>
<p>Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders.</p>
<p>This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.</p>


BROS

What Analysts Are Saying About Dutch Bros Stock

FFIE

Faraday Future Intelligent Electric Shares Halted On Circuit Breaker To The Upside, Stock Now Up 64.5%

<p>Goldman Sachs  analyst Duffy Fischer   maintains Kronos Worldwide (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KRO#NYSE">KRO</a>) with a Sell and raises the price target from $9 to $11.</p>


Goldman Sachs Maintains Sell on Kronos Worldwide, Raises Price Target to $11

<p>Truist Securities  analyst Joon Lee   reiterates Viking Therapeutics (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VKTX#NASDAQ">VKTX</a>) with a Buy and maintains $120 price target.</p>


VKTX

Truist Securities Reiterates Buy on Viking Therapeutics, Maintains $120 Price Target

<p>U.S. stocks traded slightly higher this morning on Thursday.</p>
<p>Following the market opening Thursday, the Dow traded up 0.01% to 39,913.23 while the NASDAQ rose 0.06% to 16,753.07. The S&amp;P 500 also rose, gaining, 0.06% to 5,311.26.</p>
<p>Check This Out:  <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/05/38871724/oklo-is-too-risky-jim-cramer-says-buy-this-general-electric-spinoff-instead">Oklo Is &#8216;Too Risky,&#8217; Jim Cramer Says: Buy This General Electric Spinoff Instead</a></p>
<p><strong>Leading and Lagging Sectors</strong><br /><br />Consumer staples shares rose by 1.1% on Thursday.</p>
<p>In trading on Thursday, materials shares fell by 0.4%.</p>
<p><strong>Top Headline</strong></p>
<p>U.S. initial jobless claims declined by 10,000 to 222,000 in the week ending May 11, compared to market estimates of 220,000.</p>
<p><strong>Equities Trading UP</strong><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Lucy Scientific Discovery Inc</strong>. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LSDI#NASDAQ">LSDI</a>) shares shot up 224% to $1.6750.</li>
<li>Shares of <strong>Greenwave Technology Solutions, Inc</strong>. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GWAV#NASDAQ">GWAV</a>) got a boost, surging 77% to $0.1063 after jumping around 34% on Wednesday.</li>
<li><strong>TSR, Inc.</strong> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSRI#NASDAQ">TSRI</a>) shares were also up, gaining 65% to $13.14 after the company announced that it entered into a definitive agreement to be acquired by Vienna Parent.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Equities Trading DOWN</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>KULR Technology Group, Inc</strong>. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KULR#NYSE">KULR</a>) shares dropped 26% to $0.3451 after the company announced worse-than-expected first-quarter financial results.</li>
<li>Shares of <strong>Spire Global, Inc</strong>. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPIR#NYSE">SPIR</a>) were down 24% to $8.63 after the company reported mixed first-quarter financial results on Wednesday.</li>
<li><strong>Omeros Corporation</strong> (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OMER#NASDAQ">OMER</a>) was down, falling 22% to $3.2398 after the company announced a wider-than-expected quarterly loss.</li>
</ul>
<p>Also Check This Out: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/trading-ideas/long-ideas/24/05/38872349/over-1m-bet-on-this-healthcare-stock-check-out-these-3-stocks-insiders-are-buying">Over $1M Bet On This Healthcare Stock? Check Out These 3 Stocks Insiders Are Buying</a></p>
<p><strong>Commodities</strong><br /><br />In commodity news, oil traded up 1.3% to $79.68 while gold traded down 0.7% at $2,377.70.</p>
<p>Silver traded down 0.4% to $29.605 on Thursday, while copper fell 1.3% to $4.8595.</p>
<p><strong>Euro zone</strong></p>
<p>European shares were mostly lower today. The eurozone's STOXX 600 slipped 0.06%, Germany's DAX fell 0.5% and France's CAC 40 fell 0.4%. Spain's IBEX 35 Index fell 0.18%, while London's FTSE 100 rose 0.1%.</p>
<p>Italy reported a trade surplus of EUR 4.341 billion in March, versus a year-ago surplus of EUR 3.327 billion. The annual inflation rate in Italy slowed to 0.8% in April versus 1.2% a month ago.</p>
<p><strong>Asia Pacific Markets</strong></p>
<p>Asian markets closed higher on Thursday, with Japan's Nikkei gaining 1.39%, China's Composite Index climbing 1.59%, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index gaining 0.08% and India's S&amp;P BSE Sensex gaining 0.7%.</p>
<p>Industrial production in Japan rose by 4.4% month-over-month in March following a 0.6% decline in the earlier month. Japan's economy shrank by 2.0% in the first quarter, versus market expectations for a 1.5% decline.</p>
<p><strong>Economics</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>U.S. initial jobless claims declined by 10,000 to 222,000 in the week ending May 11, compared to market estimates of 220,000.</li>
<li>U.S. housing starts increased 5.7% month-over-month to an annualized rate of 1.36 million in April, while building permits declined by 3% to 1.440 million.</li>
<li>U.S. industrial production came in little changed in April, compared to a 0.1% gain in March.</li>
<li>Import prices increased 0.9% month-over-month in April, while export prices rose 0.5% in April.</li>
<li>The Philadelphia Fed Manufacturing Index fell 11 points to a reading of 4.5 in May versus a reading of 15.5 in April.</li>
</ul>
<p>Now Read This: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/05/38872018/top-5-utilities-stocks-you-may-want-to-dump-in-may">Top 5 Utilities Stocks You May Want To Dump In May</a></p>


Earnings

Eurozone

GWAV

KULR

LSDI

OMER

SPIR

TSRI

US Stocks Edge Higher; Initial Jobless Claims Fall

Live On CNBC, Jim Cramer Discusses SharkNinja, Shares See Volume

<p>Scotiabank  analyst Nicholas Yulico   maintains Regency Centers (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/REG#NASDAQ">REG</a>) with a Sector Perform and lowers the price target from $68 to $65.</p>


Scotiabank Maintains Sector Perform on Regency Centers, Lowers Price Target to $65

iShares MSCI Israel Capped Investable Market Index Fund

ISRA

Leader Of Yemen's Houthis Says Any Ship Heading To Israeli Ports Will Be Targeted In Any Area In Our Reach; Our Operations Are Not Only Limited To The Red Sea Region

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Latest News for JPMorgan Diversified Return Emerging Markets Equity ETF (ARCA:JPEM)

Monday, February 27, 2017

Wednesday, September 30, 2015