Earnings Analysis: Alliant Energy
Alliant Energy (NYSE: LNT) reports preliminary financial results for the quarter ended 2012-09-30.
Alliant Energy Corp. recently reported its preliminary financial results based on which we provide a unique peer-based analysis of the company. Our analysis is based on the company's performance over the last twelve months (unless stated otherwise). For a more detailed analysis of this company (and over 40,000 other global equities) please visit www.capitalcube.com.
Alliant Energy Corp.'s analysis versus peers uses the following peer-set: Xcel Energy Inc. (XEL), Northeast Utilities (NU), DTE Energy Co. (DTE), Wisconsin Energy Corp. (WEC), CMS Energy Corp. (CMS), Integrys Energy Group Inc. (TEG), Westar Energy Inc (WR), Allete Inc. (ALE) and MGE Energy Inc. (MGEE). The table below shows the preliminary results along with the recent trend for revenues, net income and returns.
|Quarterly (USD million)||2012-09-30||2012-06-30||2012-03-31||2011-12-31||2011-09-30|
|Revenue Growth %||28.6||(9.8)||(12.9)||(13.9)||24.7|
|Net Income Growth %||120.5||60.3||(29.0)||(51.5)||127.7|
|Net Margin %||17.2||10.1||5.7||6.9||12.3|
|ROE % (Annualized)||20.0||8.7||5.2||7.6||16.5|
|ROA % (Annualized)||6.1||2.8||1.8||2.5||5.4|
Alliant Energy Corp.'s current Price/Book of 1.6 is about median in its peer group. The market expects LNT-US to grow at about the same rate as its chosen peers (PE of 15.7 compared to peer median of 16.0) and to maintain the peer median return (ROE of 10.7%) it currently generates.
The company's asset efficiency (asset turns of 0.3x) and net profit margins of 10.1% are both median for its peer group. LNT-US's net margin is greater than (but within one standard deviation of) its five-year average net margin of 8.3%.
The company has achieved better revenues growth than its chosen peers (year-on-year change in revenues of 7.3%) but its earnings growth performance has been below the median (change in annual reported earnings of 4.1% compared to the peer median of 12.0%). This suggests that, compared to its peers, the company is focused more on top-line revenues. LNT-US is currently converting every 1% of change in revenue into 0.6% change in annual reported earnings.
LNT-US's current return on assets is around peer median (3.3% vs. peer median 2.9%). This contrasts with its higher than peer median return on assets over the past five years (3.6% vs. peer median 2.7%), suggesting that the company's relative operating performance has declined.
The company's gross margin of 48.3% is around peer median suggesting that LNT-US's operations do not benefit from any differentiating pricing advantage. In addition, LNT-US's pre-tax margin of 12.4% is also around the peer median suggesting no operating cost advantage relative to peers.
Growth & Investment Strategy
While LNT-US's revenues have grown faster than the peer median (-0.1% vs. -1.6% respectively for the past three years), the market gives the stock an about peer median PE ratio of 15.7. This suggests that the market has some questions about the company's long-term strategy.
LNT-US's annualized rate of change in capital of 6.1% over the past three years is greater than the peer median of 4.1%. However, this investment level has only generated a peer median return on capital of 4.4% averaged over the same three years. This median return on an above median capital investment suggests the company is overinvesting.
LNT-US's net income margin for the last twelve months is around the peer median (10.1% vs. peer median of 9.1%). This average margin combined with a level of accruals that is around peer median (11.3% vs. peer median of 11.3%) suggests there possibly isn't too much accrual movement flowing into the company's reported earnings.
LNT-US's accruals over the last twelve months are positive suggesting a buildup of reserves. However, this level of accruals is also around the peer median and suggests the company is recording a proper level of reserves compared to its peers.
The following article is from one of our external contributors. It does not represent the opinion of Benzinga and has not been edited.