Britain's Great Transportation Debates

In a recent report, Morgan Stanley analysts summarized the arguments that took place at the UK's Great Transportation Debate. The debate focused on what politicians plan to do about UK transportation needs. Three panel debates focused on rail, bus and aviation needs, and representatives from the UK's Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat political parties weighed in.

Rail

The debate over rail transportation centered on whether or not the current rail franchising model in the UK has been a success. Advocates of the system argued that the system has seen high satisfaction rates and has had a limited impact on taxpayers. In addition, strong bidding competition has benefited passengers.

Related Link: Dow Theorists Watch The Transports

Opponents of the system argued that the system has led to rising fare prices, under-investment and an unclear long-term plan.

Bus

The bus debate hinged on whether the London bus model should be adopted in other British cities. Proponents of the model claimed that contracted services create more certainty and consistency, and that the current bus services in many areas are unaffordable and unreliable.

Opponents countered by claiming that approaching bus services with a "one size fits all" mentality is overly simplistic, and a better approach would be implementing systems that cater to the needs of each individual region.

Aviation

The final subject of debate centered on which London airport should be expanded: Heathrow, Gatwick or both. Debaters in favor of Heathrow expansion focused on the potential to expand London's international connectivity, especially with China.

Those in favor of Gatwick expansion highlighted that recent traffic expansion has been heaviest to and from Europe, and the cost of Gatwick expansion would be lower than the cost of a Heathrow expansion.