Google I/O: The Exciting, The Important And The Depressing

The I/O conference of Alphabet Inc

unit Google is a keenly watched event by both techies and investors as they sometimes provide indications of Google's priorities and long term strategy in addition to new and upcoming products, features and services. This year's event assumes more significance as it is the first I/O since the company restructured itself into Alphabet. Bernstein's Carlos Kirjner divides this year's event in to three categories: The Exciting, The Important, and The Depressing. The Exciting: Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning The analyst said there are two ways AI could matter for Google. First, it will allow Google to differentiate its products and services from its rivals. Second, over time, it could allow Google to "solve significant and yet-unsolved problems of great importance and significant commercial potential." Kirjner noted "of course the success of machine-learning supported services or feature-functionality will lead to significant commercial success or enable Google to catch up in areas it waffled and missed (cloud, messaging, home devices) is a case-by-case issue, but we now saw the tip of the iceberg." Though the analyst reminded that "we won't see a revolution in one or two quarters or one or two years," Sundar Pichai's statement "reflects the belief (which we share) that we are in the midst of an inflection point in what computers can do." Given the company's leadership in the area "that is exciting for Google shareholders." The Important The announcement of Android Instant Apps is important as it allows users to run apps near immediately without downloading them. "If widely adopted by developers, it will make the distinction between apps and the Web (functionally, from an end user perspective) meaningless, will make app installs much less important, and will make Web search and in app search (through deep linking) converge into one search," the analyst commented on the product. The analyst also touched on Google's digital assistant and a home device that is an attempt to catch up with Amazon's Echo that allows users to talk to, query and get information from a device using voice and natural language. "As we followed these announcements we asked ourselves: "what if they succeed?" Specifically, where are the "good old" Adwords ads if they succeed? They are nowhere. They are dead," Kirjner noted. The analyst continued that one can assume that Google will find ways to capture part of the economics of transactions, "but it is not clear to us how this works on the user side." He wondered whether Google's assistant will conduct a specific transaction even "if the counterpart has not agreed to pay Google a bounty or will it offer the user a suboptimal solution without the user's knowledge? We are not smart enough to figure this one out." The Depressing: Kirjner is "disappointed" over the "lack of original product-service thinking" as many of the announcements were clear attempts to "catch up" with Amazon.com, Inc.

and Facebook Inc

. The analyst also expressed skepticism over Google's belief that its capabilities in machine learning and AI will be an important point of differentiation for Google Cloud Platform (GCP). "That is not wrong, but we suspect enterprise customers looking to move datacenter loads related to Web services, HR, communications, test and dev, back office processing, scientific computing, and the many other "mundane" enterprise applications and use cases may not care much about AI," Kirjner elaborated. Google unveiled a messaging application named Allo, which is a clear attempt to compete with WhatsApp, about six years after WhatsApp was launched. Kirjner said he "would be more optimistic if Allo was the default messaging infrastructure of Android phones, but that does not seem to be the case." Google introduced a video messaging app named Duo, which is separate and distinct from Allo, and contains a feature named knock-knock that allows call recipients to see their callers before accepting the call. On Google Home, Kirjner said it is an attempt to catch up with Amazon's Echo/Alexa which was launched two years ago. Google would have made a great product with Home as it is right in its "wheelhouse" utilizing its capabilities of voice recognition, semantic capabilities, Knowledge Graph, machine learning and AI. But, Google's late entry deprived the first-mover advantage of user adoption and developer adoption. "We suspect Google has a good chance to overcome Amazon's lead since this is right in its wheelhouse, but what should be a non-brained is now a race," Kirjner said. Kirjner has an Outperform rating and $900 price target on the stock, which fell 1.04 percent to $714.24.