Stinkers: S&P Not Too Found Of 3 Large ETFs

Just because an ETF has surpassed a lofty assets under management (AUM) total, say $500 million, doesn't mean it's worth owning and Standard & Poor's Capital IQ highlights three such ETFs in a recent research note. And at least two of those funds, the SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production ETF XOP and the First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index FDN, are well known to many investors. Both ETFs, along with the Rydex S&P Midcap 400 Pure Growth ETF RFG, are rated underweight by S&P Capital IQ based on their underlying fundamentals. That may come as a surprise to some when considering FDN, which has over $522 million in AUM, devotes almost 18% of its weight to Google GOOG and Amazon AMZN. News that XOP, the largest of the trio discussed in the note with over $724 million in AUM, garners an underweight rating may surprise energy investors. The ETF, which is home to almost 75 stocks, doesn't allocate more than 1.59% of its weight to any one stock and some of the biggest integrated, independent and refining names call this ETF home. Of RFG, which has almost $513 million in AUM, S&P says the following: "The Overall Underweight ranking is driven by relatively weak inputs within our Performance Analytics and Risk Considerations assessments of the ETF. A number of the ETF's largest holdings are considered overvalued based on S&P Fair Value, our quantitative valuation tool, and have below-average S&P Quality Rankings, including Hansen Natural HANS and TIBCO Software TIBX. "These three ETFs are among the lower-ranked securities in our coverage universe, standing out unfavorably due in part to the valuation and risk characteristics of their underlying holdings, according to S&P Capital IQ. While they are providing investors exposure to certain narrow aspects of the equity markets in a transparent, diversified vehicle, we think that learning what's inside can help sort through potential alternatives," S&P analyst Todd Rosenbluth said in the note. Overall, the performance of RFG isn't terrible as the ETF is only slightly negative year-to-date. XOP is down 5% while FDN is down about 8%. S&P was critical of FDN's 0.6% expense ratio and said XOP's "underlying holdings are considered on average to be overvalued based of S&P Fair Value as well as having both below-average S&P Quality Rankings and relatively weak, non-investment-grade S&P Credit Ratings."
Market News and Data brought to you by Benzinga APIs
Comments
Loading...
date
ticker
name
Price Target
Upside/Downside
Recommendation
Firm
Posted In: Analyst ColorLong IdeasNewsSector ETFsBroad U.S. Equity ETFsShort IdeasSpecialty ETFsPre-Market OutlookAfter-Hours CenterMarketsAnalyst RatingsTechTrading IdeasETFs
Benzinga simplifies the market for smarter investing

Trade confidently with insights and alerts from analyst ratings, free reports and breaking news that affects the stocks you care about.

Join Now: Free!