Custom Search Insider Trading Activity Insider Trading Activity
Attention insiders: Dive deeper into market movements and stay ahead of the curve with Benzinga Pro! From up-to-the-second news to audio squawks and interactive data tools, it's everything you need to supercharge your trading strategy. Experience the Benzinga Pro advantage today and transform the way you trade with our exclusive free trial!
Custom Search Insider Trading Activity
Updated Jul 29, 2011
Ticker
|
Company Name
|
Qty.
|
Price
|
Size ($)
|
Filing Date
|
Type
|
Δ Own
|
Own
|
Insider Names
|
Title
|
Trade Dates
|
Is Scheduled
| |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Christopher & Banks Corp
| 11.38K |
—
|
—
| +24.28% | 58.26K |
Jul 27
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
Jan 10
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
Jul 27
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| 9.52K |
—
|
—
| +20.32% | 56.4K |
Jul 27
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| 10K |
—
|
—
| +27.12% | 46.88K |
Jul 29
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| 3.5K |
—
|
—
| +10.49% | 36.88K |
Jul 30
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| 3.5K |
—
|
—
| +11.72% | 33.38K |
Aug 1
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| -9.60K |
$29.81 | -$286,179.84 | -24.32% | 29.88K |
Sep 25
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| 2.5K |
—
|
—
| +6.76% | 39.48K |
Jul 26
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
Jul 27
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| -37.89K |
$18.32 | -$694,002.70 | -50.61% | 36.98K |
Jun 23
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| -35.00K |
$17.96 | -$628,498.50 | -31.86% | 74.86K |
Jan 19
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| -10.00K |
$18.05 | -$180,520.28 | -8.34% | 109.86K |
Jan 3 - Jan 4
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
Jul 28
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
| -31.19K |
$20.70 | -$645,671.60 | -20.65% | 119.86K |
Apr 12 - Apr 13
| |||||||
Christopher & Banks Corp
|
0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
0
|
Jul 30
| |||||||
It looks like there's no data for these filter options. Maybe you'll be interested in these options instead. |