The company has two operating segments: Hong Kong Trading and PRC Manufacturing. Hong Kong Trading mainly engages in the trading of flange and fitting products sourced from suppliers, and this operating segment is conducted through Luda HK. PRC Manufacturing represents the trading and manufacturing of the in-house flanges and fittings products. It generates the majority of its revenue from the PRC Manufacturing segment. Geographically, it generates the majority of its revenue from the People's Republic of China (PRC).
We grade stocks based on past performance, their future growth potential, intrinsic value, dividend history, and overall financial health.
The chart below shows how we grade Luda Technology Group (LUD) across the board compared to its closest peers.
Benzinga Edge stock rankings give you four critical scores to help you identify the strongest and weakest stocks to buy and sell.
56.31
Value is a percentile-ranked composite metric that evaluates a stock's relative worth by comparing its market price to fundamental measures of the company's assets, earnings, sales, and operating performance.
5.25
Momentum measures a stock's relative strength based on its price movement patterns and volatility over multiple timeframes, ranked as a percentile against other stocks.
See how Luda Technology Group compares to its peers in these key performance metrics from Benzinga Rankings.
The two main factors that we consider when analyzing past performance is overall return and volatility
Using these two metrics, we can determine if this stock gave its investors enough return for the risk that they took on by owning it. This is measured by the sharpe ratio, which has been used as a primary measure of risk/reward trade-off for almost 60 years.
This ratio can be interpreted as the amount of return an investor has received for the amount of risk that they took on by owning the stock over that timeframe.
Luda Technology Group (LUD) sharpe ratio over the past 5 years is 0.0938 which is considered to be below average compared to the peer average of 0.2014
