Market Overview

Marketfy Maven

Sign up to get updates and product information from this Maven

Tim Melvin

Tim Melvin is a value investor, money manager and writer. He has spent the last 27 years as in the financial services and investment industry as a broker, advisor and portfolio manager. He has also...

>> Read more from this author

Down On The Corner Of Main Street And Wall Street

There was an interesting article in the Wall Street Journal this week about the intense competition among banks to manage the assets of the wealthier clients. Many of them are now offering what they call ‘lifestyle advisory services,' which include everything from planning a vacation to finding the right dorm room for your children.

There is a lot of money involved, as the fees from managing the assets of the wealthiest American can be a substantial source of income. Interestingly, these added services are being offered as the services for the non-mega rich.

Fees for mundane banking services needed by the rest of the populace are rising. Money-Rates.com recently reported that the fees for things like overdrafts, ATM usage and account maintenance rose again in the first half of 2013.

The high-end wealth market has been getting bigger, as asset prices have recovered in the past five years. There are now more than 10 million millionaires in the United States and more than one million households have assets of $5 million or more. That's a nice pool of money for the banks to fight over, with average fees of about one percent charged for wealth management services.

Related: Risks Associated With Tapping Home Equity To Buy Stocks

While the millionaires club is growing, this development also points out the growing distance between Wall Street and Main Street. A substantial amount of this wealth increase has been created by the revaluing of financial assets as a result of monetary policies.

The wealth gap created by the re-inflating of financial assets has become something of a political football this year and will probably continue to be so as we approach mid-year elections. Political considerations aside, this is going to become an issue for stock prices, as rational economics would seem to demand that eventually we see real growth in business activity to justify higher stock prices; there has been little sign of that in recent years.

While S&P 500 earnings have more than doubled since the market bottom in 2009, revenue growth has substantially lessened. Most of the profit growth seems to have been achieved through cost-cutting measures, including workforce reductions and financial engineering tools like stock buybacks.

The reason for the tepid revenue growth becomes somewhat obvious when you take a close look at Main Street. Even as we hear discussion about an improving job market, the U6 rate of unemployed and underemployed individuals is still hovering at about 15 percent of a declining workforce. There is no official inflation in the economy, but down on Main Street the price of beef, coffee and gasoline have seen sharp rises in recent weeks. It's no wonder the recent Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index shows that consumers have a negative view of the economy right now.

Even as the market had one of its best years ever, the index fell from -33 at this time last year to -29, as most people just did not see the results of low interest policies that those with substantial assets in the stock markets enjoyed last year.

Related: Executive Exhaustion Fuels Opportunity For Investors

Seth Klarman referred to the disconnect between stock prices and economic activity in his recent letter to shareholders calling it a Truman Show Economy. He wrote, “Every Truman under Bernanke's dome knows the environment is phony. But the zeitgeist is so damn pleasant, the days so resplendent, the mood so euphoric, the returns so irresistible, that no one wants it to end, and no one wants to exit the dome until they're sure everyone else won't stay on forever.”

This should be a real concern of most investors.

The disconnect between economic activity and stock prices can be resolved in three ways. First, the economy can begin to grow at a rate fast enough to justify stock prices. Second, of course, is the possibility that the stock market declines to a level that is in-line with real economic activity. The third possibility is that stock prices go nowhere until the economy eventually catches.

Two of those possible outcomes are not happy events for investors in the stock market.

Many investors are not concerned about the disconnect and take the strong performance of the market as a cause for celebration. Klarman addressed this issue in his letter as well, writing, “No one can know what the future holds, but any year in which the S&P 500 jumps 32% and the NASDAQ Composite 40% while corporate earnings barely increase should be cause for concern, not further exuberance. It might not look like it now, but markets don't exist simply to enrich people.”

If Main Street isn't happy with the economic and jobs situation, they will be cautious with their money. That's a real problem when your economy is driven by consumer activity. If it doesn't improve, there is a very real chance it will eventually be reflected in stock prices.

Tags: banks Bloomberg Bloomberg Consumer Comfort Index

Posted in: Education Wall Street Journal Politics Media General