Market Overview

Why Toymakers Are Leaving Mattel In The Dust


Mattel, Inc. (NASDAQ: MAT) CEO Bryan Stockton went down with the ship this past Monday, resigning as the toy company pre-announced its abysmal holiday quarter results.

The full earnings report was released on Friday morning.

It was just as ugly as Mattel said it would be. Earnings sank 51 percent from $1.07 per share to 52 cents and revenue slid from $2.11 billion to $1.99 billion. At the time of the announcement contributing analysts on Estimize were looking for EPS of 97 cents and sales of $2.16 billion. The problem for Mattel is that the woes aren't contained to just this quarter.

The company's outlook is deteriorating too.


The issues start with Mattel's core products. Barbie makes a prime example. In the third quarter, Barbie sales sank a staggering 21 percent. Barbie and Fisher Price sales have been on the decline resulting in five straight quarters of revenue decreases.

Money that would be spent on children's entertainment is shifting from physical toys to gadgets and digital products. That excuse doesn't let Mattel off the hook though. In September Mattel lost its #1 toymaker status to competitor Lego.


Lego's popularity surged following the acclaimed Lego Movie. Meanwhile Mattel's branding has struggled as Barbie dolls have been accused of setting unrealistic body image standards for young girls. The one line where Mattel was having success was Walt Disney Co (NYSE: DIS) princess toys. 

In September, Mattel lost its licensing contract to supply Disney princess toys to Hasbro, Inc. (NASDAQ: HAS). Hasbro will take over production of Disney dolls in 2016.

Barron's estimated that contract to be worth $500 million a year in revenue with half coming from sales related to the animated film, Frozen.

With industry trends working against it, tumbling market share, and the loss of its right to make Disney toys Mattel is in rough shape. Mattel's folly has been its reluctance to adapt to a changing world. The company hasn't made headway in digital or innovated with physical toys. Hasbro showed that it's still possible to be successful with toys with its Nerf Rebelle bow. The pink bow launches foam tipped arrows.

It was brilliantly marketed toward young girls, capitalizing on the success of The Hunger Games books and films which star a young female bow-wielding heroine. Lego was able to promote its toys by connecting them to a funny film.

Meanwhile, Mattel hasn't done much of anything and it's getting left behind.

The preceding article is from one of our external contributors. It does not represent the opinion of Benzinga and has not been edited.

Posted-In: Short Ideas Trading Ideas


Related Articles (DIS + HAS)

View Comments and Join the Discussion!

50 Financial Experts Share Their First Investment Ever

Credit Suisse Predicts 3 Earnings Beats And 6 Misses From Offshore Drillers