Best Sector ETFs For March: Banking On Oil

If historical trends hold true to form, the arrival of the third month of the year could be good news for equity investors. Over the past years, the S&P 500 averaged a March gain of 2.1 percent, making March the second-best month of the year for U.S. stocks. Only October is historically better.

With March usually being kind to stocks, sector-level opportunities are abound. In fact, none of the original nine sector SPDR exchange-traded funds average March losses. Among the best-performing sector SPDRs in March, both hail from widely followed sectors and one is up year-to-date while the other is mired in a slump.

Since 1999, the first full of year trading for the sector SPDR ETFs, the Financial Select Sector SPDR XLF is usually the best-performing member of the suite in March, averaging a third-month gain of about 3 percent, according to CXO Advisory.

XLF, the largest financial services ETF by assets, is up 4 percent year-to-date. March is one of three months in which XLF ranks as the best sector SPDR fund on a historical basis.

Energizing With Energy

After ranking as one of the worst-performing sectors last year, energy started 2018 on a solid note, but that ebullience quickly evaporated. The Energy Select Sector SPDR XLE, the largest equity-based energy ETF by assets, is down almost 7 percent year-to-date.

Energy bulls are hoping XLE can live up to its historical reputation in March because the ETF is usually the second-best SPDR behind XLF in the third month of the year. XLE averages a March gain of just under 3 percent, according to CXO.

The February through April period marks a stretch in which XLE is the second-best sector SPDR for three consecutive months.

March Laggards

As was noted earlier, none of the sector SPDR ETFs average March losses, so deeming any of them “laggards” in third month of the year is a stretch. Interestingly, the March laggards among the sector SPDRs both track defensive sectors.

On a historical basis, the two worst-performing sector SPDRs in March are the Health Care Select Sector SPDR XLV and the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR XLP, according to CXO.

Year-to-date, XLP is getting drubbed to the tune of a 6 percent loss while XLV is higher by 2.4 percent. Both ETFs average March gains of more than 1 percent.

Related Links:

A Golden Goldman ETF

Tests For The Italy ETF

Disclosure: The author owns shares of XLF.

Posted In: Long IdeasSector ETFsTop StoriesTrading IdeasETFs

Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.

All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to improve the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.

Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.

Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.