How The Next President Could Affect Commodities ETFs

Despite all the commotion about this being a good year for commodities, the iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed (ETF) GSG is flat year-to-date. That condition is unlikely to persist after the results of Tuesday's presidential election start trickling in.

The Climate

As has been widely documented, gold and perhaps some other precious metals are believed to me the only potential near-term beneficiaries of Republican challenger Donald Trump claiming the White House. A legitimate case can also be made that given her harsh rhetoric aimed at the coal industry and the Democrats' lengthy history of hostility toward the oil industry, the oil patch does not want to see Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton win the presidency.

History can be instructive for investors looking to make commodities bets following the election. In fact, gold investors might just want Clinton to win whether they know it or not.

It's Not That Simple

“While volatility and fear generally have supported gold around election uncertainty (in fact, this year through Oct. gold in the index is posting its 6th best year ever going back to 1979 (+19.3 percent) and is on pace for its best year since 2011,) gold does significantly better under the historical Democratic presidencies, adding 24.3 percent on average in Democratic terms versus Republican ones since 1978,” according to a recent note by S&P Dow Jones Indices.

GSG tracks the S&P GSCI Total Return Index, which offers investors exposure to energy, industrial and precious metals, agricultural, and livestock commodities. Again, history suggests mixed performances for various commodities when Republicans control the White House.

“Like gold, most commodities do better on average under Democratic rule, but the majority of highs and lows for commodities are under the Republican presidencies. Of the 24 commodities, 14 have had their best performance and 18 have had their worst performance with Republican presidents. However, 17 single commodities have had better performance on average under Democratic Presidents,” noted S&P Dow Jones Indices.

Some agricultural commodities, namely corn, wheat, Kansas wheat and soybeans, perform better when Republicans occupy the White House.

So, it could be good news for the PowerShares DB Agriculture Fund DBA if Trump wins, as that ETF allocates nearly 35 percent of its combined weight to corn, soybeans and wheat.

Posted In: 2016 presidential electioncoalcommodities ETFscrudeCrude OilDonald TrumpenergygasGoldHillary ClintonOilOil & GasS&P Dow Jones IndicesLong IdeasSpecialty ETFsCommoditiesPoliticsMarketsTrading IdeasETFsGeneral

Ad Disclosure: The rate information is obtained by Bankrate from the listed institutions. Bankrate cannot guaranty the accuracy or availability of any rates shown above. Institutions may have different rates on their own websites than those posted on Bankrate.com. The listings that appear on this page are from companies from which this website receives compensation, which may impact how, where, and in what order products appear. This table does not include all companies or all available products.

All rates are subject to change without notice and may vary depending on location. These quotes are from banks, thrifts, and credit unions, some of whom have paid for a link to their own Web site where you can find additional information. Those with a paid link are our Advertisers. Those without a paid link are listings we obtain to improve the consumer shopping experience and are not Advertisers. To receive the Bankrate.com rate from an Advertiser, please identify yourself as a Bankrate customer. Bank and thrift deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Credit union deposits are insured by the National Credit Union Administration.

Consumer Satisfaction: Bankrate attempts to verify the accuracy and availability of its Advertisers' terms through its quality assurance process and requires Advertisers to agree to our Terms and Conditions and to adhere to our Quality Control Program. If you believe that you have received an inaccurate quote or are otherwise not satisfied with the services provided to you by the institution you choose, please click here.

Rate collection and criteria: Click here for more information on rate collection and criteria.