 (OTC:SIRLF) Stock, Quote.Headers.trade-ideas

The first season of MrBeast&#8216;s &#8220;Beast Games,&#8221; a reality show that transitioned the YouTube sensation to television, has recently concluded on Amazon Prime Video. The final episode featured a contestant walking away with an impressive $10 million prize.
What Happened: The reality show, which saw 1,000 participants battling it out in a series of&nbsp;mental and physical challenges, has&nbsp;been a massive hit, largely due to its substantial prize pool. Jeff Allen, also known as Player 831, emerged as the grand winner, pocketing slightly more than $10 million.
MrBeast, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, disclosed that the total prize money awarded throughout the season was slightly above $25 million. Apart from the grand prize, Allen also earned an additional $4,042 from various challenges during the season.
According to the report <a href="https://www.forbes.com/sites/dimitarmixmihov/2025/02/14/beast-games-heres-how-much-money-players-won-on-mrbeasts-10-million-game-show/">by </a>Forbes, a total of 85 players won cash prizes, with the top ten winners taking home amounts ranging from $100,000 to over $10 million. The remaining winners received prizes between $14,000 and $19,231.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/02/37195970/youtubes-top-earner-mrbeast-says-hes-not-rich-because-of-this-one-reason">YouTube&#8217;s Top Earner MrBeast Says He&#8217;s Not Rich Because Of This One Reason</a>
MrBeast also revealed that $4.2 million was distributed&nbsp;to Beast Games viewers who&nbsp;participated in a giveaway, a&nbsp;part of a brand partnership&nbsp;with a popular borrowing and&nbsp;lending app.
Why It Matters: The success of Beast Games underscores the growing trend of digital creators transitioning into traditional media. MrBeast&#8217;s move from YouTube to a television reality show signifies the increasing influence of digital creators and the potential of such platforms to create engaging content that attracts massive viewership.
The substantial prize pool also highlights the financial power of digital creators and their ability to attract audiences and sponsors. 
The distribution of $4.2 million to viewers&nbsp;as part of a brand&nbsp;partnership demonstrates the potential for innovative marketing strategies that engage audiences directly.
Read Next
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/general/entertainment/23/05/32297538/mrbeast-invades-suburbia-buys-neighborhood-cul-de-sac-to-create-ultimate-friend-zone">MrBeast Invades Suburbia: Buys Neighborhood Cul-De-Sac To Create Ultimate Friend Zone</a>
Image: Shutterstock

Entertainment

News

MrBeast's Beast Games Wraps Up First Season - Here's How Much Money Players Won

In the dynamic and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) and its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, our aim is to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>38.34</td>
<td>54.35</td>
<td>9.34</td>
<td>58.74%</td>
<td>$45.91</td>
<td>$58.27</td>
<td>3.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>11.03</td>
<td>1.13</td>
<td>0.94</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>$2.61</td>
<td>15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>21.05</td>
<td>4.53</td>
<td>1.70</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>21.68</td>
<td>26.83</td>
<td>3.85</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>19.53</td>
<td>1.94</td>
<td>1.48</td>
<td>4.89%</td>
<td>$0.96</td>
<td>$1.52</td>
<td>41.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>173.18</td>
<td>15.62</td>
<td>7.82</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>8.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>11.47</td>
<td>0.66</td>
<td>0.70</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>59.55</td>
<td>3.64</td>
<td>1.10</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>23.31</td>
<td>0.97</td>
<td>0.59</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>42.6</td>
<td>6.91</td>
<td>2.27</td>
<td>7.43%</td>
<td>$0.42</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>21.69%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By thoroughly analyzing Apple, we can discern the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 38.34, which is 0.9x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 54.35, which is 7.87x the industry average, Apple might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 9.34, surpassing the industry average by 4.11x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 58.74% is 51.31% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $45.91 Billion, which is 109.31x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $58.27 Billion, which indicates 71.06x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company is witnessing a substantial decline in revenue growth, with a rate of 3.95% compared to the industry average of 21.69%, which indicates a challenging sales environment.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804446_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is an important measure to assess the financial structure and risk profile of a company.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Apple stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Compared to its top 4 peers, Apple has a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 1.45, indicating a balanced financial structure.
</li>
<li>
This suggests that the company maintains a reasonable level of debt while also leveraging equity financing.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, but may be facing challenges in revenue expansion.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Markets

Trading Ideas

AAPL

Assessing Apple's Performance Against Competitors In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry

Over the past 24 hours, Ethereum's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/eth/usd">ETH</a>) price rose 4.62% to $2,817.65. This continues its positive trend over the past week where it has experienced a 5.0% gain, moving from $2,649.93 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $4,878.26. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for Ethereum over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804437_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has tumbled 26.0% over the past week along with the circulating supply of the coin, which has fallen 0.05%. This brings the circulating supply to 120.56 million. According to our data, the current market cap ranking for ETH is #2 at $339.41 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804437_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

Movers

$ETH

Ethereum Rises More Than 4% In 24 hours

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Amazon.com (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMZN#NASDAQ">AMZN</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Broadline Retail industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Amazon.com Background</h3>
Amazon is the leading online retailer and marketplace for third party sellers. Retail related revenue represents approximately 75% of total, followed by Amazon Web Services' cloud computing, storage, database, and other offerings (15%), advertising services (5% to 10%), and other the remainder. International segments constitute 25% to 30% of Amazon's non-AWS sales, led by Germany, the United Kingdom, and Japan.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Amazon.com Inc</td>
<td>41.66</td>
<td>8.54</td>
<td>3.87</td>
<td>6.19%</td>
<td>$32.08</td>
<td>$31.0</td>
<td>11.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alibaba Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>24.82</td>
<td>2.18</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>4.64%</td>
<td>$54.02</td>
<td>$92.47</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>PDD Holdings Inc</td>
<td>12.08</td>
<td>4.43</td>
<td>3.51</td>
<td>9.38%</td>
<td>$29.18</td>
<td>$59.65</td>
<td>44.33%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MercadoLibre Inc</td>
<td>73.29</td>
<td>26.17</td>
<td>5.73</td>
<td>10.37%</td>
<td>$0.72</td>
<td>$2.44</td>
<td>35.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JD.com Inc</td>
<td>12.85</td>
<td>1.83</td>
<td>0.40</td>
<td>5.22%</td>
<td>$15.92</td>
<td>$45.04</td>
<td>5.12%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Coupang Inc</td>
<td>43.95</td>
<td>10.74</td>
<td>1.56</td>
<td>1.74%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$2.27</td>
<td>27.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>eBay Inc</td>
<td>17.45</td>
<td>6.12</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>11.59%</td>
<td>$0.95</td>
<td>$1.85</td>
<td>3.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Vipshop Holdings Ltd</td>
<td>7.44</td>
<td>1.54</td>
<td>0.56</td>
<td>2.76%</td>
<td>$1.47</td>
<td>$4.96</td>
<td>-9.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dillard's Inc</td>
<td>12.86</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>1.21</td>
<td>6.37%</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>-3.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MINISO Group Holding Ltd</td>
<td>22.96</td>
<td>5.42</td>
<td>3.75</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.88</td>
<td>$2.03</td>
<td>19.29%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ollie's Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc</td>
<td>31.76</td>
<td>4.04</td>
<td>2.93</td>
<td>2.24%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>7.79%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Macy's Inc</td>
<td>24.77</td>
<td>1.01</td>
<td>0.18</td>
<td>0.66%</td>
<td>$0.29</td>
<td>$2.04</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Nordstrom Inc</td>
<td>15.39</td>
<td>4.07</td>
<td>0.27</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>$1.31</td>
<td>4.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Savers Value Village Inc</td>
<td>24.61</td>
<td>4.18</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>5.09%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.22</td>
<td>0.53%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kohl's Corp</td>
<td>5.34</td>
<td>0.35</td>
<td>0.08</td>
<td>0.58%</td>
<td>$0.28</td>
<td>$1.57</td>
<td>-8.49%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Groupon Inc</td>
<td>18.45</td>
<td>12.66</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>34.72%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>-9.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hour Loop Inc</td>
<td>41.40</td>
<td>10.88</td>
<td>0.51</td>
<td>7.3%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>6.6%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>24.34</td>
<td>6.23</td>
<td>1.79</td>
<td>7.13%</td>
<td>$6.54</td>
<td>$13.55</td>
<td>7.83%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Upon a comprehensive analysis of Amazon.com, the following trends can be discerned: 
<ul>
<li>
The current Price to Earnings ratio of 41.66 is 1.71x higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 8.54, which is 1.37x the industry average, Amazon.com might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 3.87, which is 2.16x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 6.19%, which is 0.94% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.08 Billion, which is 4.91x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $31.0 Billion, which indicates 2.29x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 11.04% exceeds the industry average of 7.83%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804436_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio assesses the extent to which a company relies on borrowed funds compared to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Amazon.com stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Amazon.com has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.52.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Amazon.com, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that the stock may be overvalued. The low ROE suggests that Amazon.com is not generating significant returns on shareholder equity. However, the high EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth show that the company is performing well in terms of operational and financial metrics compared to its industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AMZN

Exploring The Competitive Space: Amazon.com Versus Industry Peers In Broadline Retail

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>30.53</td>
<td>10.11</td>
<td>11.58</td>
<td>12.0%</td>
<td>$28.26</td>
<td>$39.55</td>
<td>20.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>23.15</td>
<td>6.98</td>
<td>6.62</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>12.84</td>
<td>0.95</td>
<td>1.85</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>14.64</td>
<td>5.58</td>
<td>7.49</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>36.09</td>
<td>3.44</td>
<td>7.44</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>339</td>
<td>2.09</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>24.73</td>
<td>3.61</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>7.46</td>
<td>0.74</td>
<td>1.61</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>14.38</td>
<td>0.49</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>68.27</td>
<td>2.62</td>
<td>1.46</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>40.12</td>
<td>1.31</td>
<td>1.77</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>8.37</td>
<td>0.89</td>
<td>1</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>53.55</td>
<td>2.61</td>
<td>3.25</td>
<td>2.99%</td>
<td>$4.21</td>
<td>$6.75</td>
<td>4.12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting a comprehensive analysis of Meta Platforms, the following trends become evident: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 30.53 is 0.57x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 10.11 which exceeds the industry average by 3.87x.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 11.58, surpassing the industry average by 3.56x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 12.0%, which is 9.01% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $28.26 Billion, which is 6.71x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $39.55 Billion, which indicates 5.86x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 20.63% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 4.12%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804428_0_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In light of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, a comparison between Meta Platforms and its top 4 peers reveals the following information:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Meta Platforms has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.27.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The PE, PB, and PS ratios for Meta Platforms indicate that it may be overvalued compared to its peers in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. However, its high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong operational performance and growth potential relative to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Comparing Meta Platforms With Industry Competitors In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

Aramark's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/ARMK#NYSE">ARMK</a>) short percent of float has fallen 23.92% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 4.20 million shares sold short, which is 1.59% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.56 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Aramark Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804428_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Aramark has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Aramark's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Aramark's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 9.23%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

ARMK

Looking Into Aramark's Recent Short Interest

Legend Biotech's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/LEGN#NYSE">LEGN</a>) short percent of float has fallen 3.66% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 12.63 million shares sold short, which is 13.15% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 10.07 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Legend Biotech Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804423_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Legend Biotech has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Legend Biotech's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Legend Biotech's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 11.60%, which means the company has more short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

LEGN

Peering Into Legend Biotech's Recent Short Interest

In the dynamic and fiercely competitive business environment, conducting a thorough analysis of companies is crucial for investors and industry enthusiasts. In this article, we will perform an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Software industry. By closely examining crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to offer valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>33.08</td>
<td>10.08</td>
<td>11.72</td>
<td>8.17%</td>
<td>$36.79</td>
<td>$47.83</td>
<td>12.27%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>42.51</td>
<td>35.38</td>
<td>9</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>144.66</td>
<td>21.26</td>
<td>18.78</td>
<td>4.06%</td>
<td>$0.62</td>
<td>$2.33</td>
<td>21.34%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>52.37</td>
<td>22.41</td>
<td>17.30</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>889.75</td>
<td>36.55</td>
<td>30.33</td>
<td>-0.57%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>28.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>48.66</td>
<td>56.43</td>
<td>14.25</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>27.47</td>
<td>8.03</td>
<td>4.50</td>
<td>7.48%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.79</td>
<td>4.01%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>516.66</td>
<td>15.50</td>
<td>17.28</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>31.21</td>
<td>3.24</td>
<td>6.23</td>
<td>2.72%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.32</td>
<td>13.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>48.30</td>
<td>28.06</td>
<td>8.79</td>
<td>3.9%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>21.13%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>23.25</td>
<td>1.19</td>
<td>21.18</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>30.35</td>
<td>10.82</td>
<td>8.68</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>28.67</td>
<td>2.25</td>
<td>4.02</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>37.60</td>
<td>5.72</td>
<td>3.41</td>
<td>0.27%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>21.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>21.41</td>
<td>17.87</td>
<td>1.39</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>138.78</td>
<td>18.91</td>
<td>11.8</td>
<td>13.01%</td>
<td>$0.59</td>
<td>$1.3</td>
<td>13.58%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>By conducting an in-depth analysis of Microsoft, we can identify the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 33.08, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.24x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 10.08, significantly falling below the industry average by 0.53x, it suggests undervaluation and the possibility of untapped growth prospects.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively low Price to Sales ratio of 11.72, which is 0.99x the industry average, the stock might be considered undervalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.17% is 4.84% below the industry average, suggesting potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $36.79 Billion, which is 62.36x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $47.83 Billion, which indicates 36.79x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 12.27% is significantly below the industry average of 13.58%. This suggests a potential struggle in generating increased sales volume.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804421_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio gauges the extent to which a company has financed its operations through debt relative to equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
In terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Microsoft stands in comparison with its top 4 peers, leading to the following comparisons:
<ul>
<li>
Microsoft is in a relatively stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers, as evidenced by its lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company relies less on debt financing and has a more favorable balance between debt and equity.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. However, the low ROE suggests lower profitability relative to industry peers. On the other hand, Microsoft's high EBITDA and gross profit signify strong operational performance, while the low revenue growth may raise concerns about future prospects compared to industry peers.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Market Analysis: Microsoft And Competitors In Software Industry

Target's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TGT#NYSE">TGT</a>) short percent of float has fallen 11.85% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 10.87 million shares sold short, which is 2.38% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.07 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Target Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804415_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Target has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Target's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Target's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.38%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

How Is The Market Feeling About Target?

In today's rapidly changing and highly competitive business world, it is vital for investors and industry enthusiasts to carefully assess companies. In this article, we will perform a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) against its key competitors in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing important financial metrics, market position, and growth prospects, we aim to provide valuable insights for investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>53.41</td>
<td>50.28</td>
<td>29.70</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>182.79</td>
<td>16.33</td>
<td>21.85</td>
<td>6.49%</td>
<td>$7.29</td>
<td>$9.0</td>
<td>51.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>29.29</td>
<td>8.01</td>
<td>11.88</td>
<td>9.05%</td>
<td>$596.09</td>
<td>$512.38</td>
<td>38.84%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>18.57</td>
<td>7.08</td>
<td>4.77</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>111.81</td>
<td>3.15</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>216.88</td>
<td>27.07</td>
<td>47.34</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>34.77</td>
<td>9.76</td>
<td>10.62</td>
<td>7.05%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-3.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>27.41</td>
<td>2.28</td>
<td>3.69</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>63.82</td>
<td>2.95</td>
<td>11.07</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>-10.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>19.13</td>
<td>10.64</td>
<td>15.49</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>95.19</td>
<td>4.84</td>
<td>6.19</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>24.55</td>
<td>2.38</td>
<td>1.31</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>14.03</td>
<td>2.44</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>14.40</td>
<td>1.23</td>
<td>1.69</td>
<td>1.95%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>2.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>13.81</td>
<td>2.26</td>
<td>4.48</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>10.07</td>
<td>1.41</td>
<td>2.26</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>20.36</td>
<td>1.66</td>
<td>2.64</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>144.07</td>
<td>12.30</td>
<td>17.21</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qorvo Inc</td>
<td>276.75</td>
<td>2.14</td>
<td>1.96</td>
<td>1.22%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.39</td>
<td>-14.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>28.86</td>
<td>4.30</td>
<td>10.64</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>70.87</td>
<td>6.43</td>
<td>9.75</td>
<td>3.99%</td>
<td>$35.62</td>
<td>$31.05</td>
<td>7.25%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through an analysis of NVIDIA, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The Price to Earnings ratio of 53.41 is 0.75x lower than the industry average, indicating potential undervaluation for the stock.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 50.28 which exceeds the industry average by 7.82x.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 29.7, surpassing the industry average by 3.05x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% that is 27.14% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.64x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has lower gross profit of $26.16 Billion, which indicates 0.84x below the industry average, potentially indicating lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 93.61% exceeds the industry average of 7.25%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804412_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a financial metric that helps determine the level of financial risk associated with a company's capital structure.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By evaluating NVIDIA against its top 4 peers in terms of the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following observations arise:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
The low P/E ratio suggests that NVIDIA may be undervalued compared to its peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. However, the high P/B and P/S ratios indicate that the market values the company's assets and sales at a premium. On the other hand, the high ROE, revenue growth, and low EBITDA and gross profit ratios suggest that NVIDIA is generating strong returns on equity and experiencing significant revenue growth, despite lower profitability margins.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

Industry Comparison: Evaluating NVIDIA Against Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Jabil (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/JBL#NYSE">JBL</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 1.52% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 9.98%. Currently, Jabil has a market capitalization of $18.58 billion. 
Buying $1000 In JBL: If an investor had bought $1000 of JBL stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $6,879.56 today based on a price of $169.65 for JBL at the time of writing.
<h3>Jabil's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739804410_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Jabil Stock In The Last 20 Years

A February filing shows that Senator Thomas H Tuberville reported a sale in Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSCO#NASDAQ">TSCO</a>), valued between $76,006 and $265,000. The transaction date is listed as February 14, 2025, with the report published on February 14, 2025.
At present, Tractor Supply shares are trading down 0.07% at $56.95.
<h3>Senator's Recent Trading Activity</h3>
In the past three years, Thomas H Tuberville made 972 stock trades totaling more than $14.58 million. The largest trades involved stocks like ChannelAdvisor and Microsoft. Their most notable trades made recently include key transactions: 
<ul>
<li>Tractor Supply (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TSCO#NASDAQ">TSCO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
<li>Texas Instruments (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/TXN#NASDAQ">TXN</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
<li>Diageo (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DEO#NYSE">DEO</a>): $15,001 - $50,000 Sale</li>
</ul>
Here's a summary of Thomas H Tuberville's recent trades:
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>Ticker</th>
<th>Stock Type</th>
<th>Amount</th>
<th>Transaction Type</th>
<th>Transaction Date</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Tractor Supply</td>
<td>TSCO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-01-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Carrier Global</td>
<td>CARR</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$1,001 - $15,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-01-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments</td>
<td>TXN</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-01-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Diageo</td>
<td>DEO</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-01-10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft</td>
<td>MSFT</td>
<td>STOCK</td>
<td>$15,001 - $50,000</td>
<td>S</td>
<td>2025-01-10</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
If you want to stay updated on Thomas H Tuberville's trades and other congressional members, check out our <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/gov-trades/members/thomas-h-tuberville">government trades tool</a> to track their activity in real time!
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
A congressional transaction is when any representative or senator either buys or sells an individual stock.
Anyone working in Congress must file a Periodic Transaction Report to inform the public of their recent transaction within 30 days of being notified of the transaction and within 45 days of the transaction date.
In April 2012, Former President Barack Obama signed the STOCK Act into law. The act prohibits members of Congress from using private information given to them by their position for personal gain such as buying or selling a stock. The act also expanded disclosure requirements for members of Congress by requiring them to file a monthly disclosure.
<h3>The Importance of Congressional Transactions</h3>
Congressional transactions shouldn't be the primary reason for an investing decision, but they can be an important factor for an investor to consider.
When a senator or representative makes a new purchase, it could be an indication they expect the stock to rise.
A sale, on the other hand, can be made for a variety of reasons, and may not necessarily mean the seller thinks the stock will go down.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Government

Politics

General

TSCO

This Senator Just Sold Up To $265K In Tractor Supply Stock

<figure class="wp-block-image size-full"><img loading="lazy" decoding="async" width="859" height="509" src="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/17131650/image-10.png" alt="" class="wp-image-5951" srcset="https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/17131650/image-10.png 859w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/17131650/image-10-300x178.png 300w,https://contributor-assets.benzinga.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/17131650/image-10-768x455.png 768w" sizes="(max-width: 859px) 100vw, 859px" /></figure>
&#x1f4c8;The stock market rallied last week, with the S&amp;P 500 rising 1.5% to close at 6,114.63. It's now up 4% year to date and up 70.9% from its October 12, 2022&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/20944800-ed2d-4a00-b42e-7c8285f85637?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">closing low of 3,577.03</a>. For more on market moves, read:&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/c4578495-c493-4adc-983d-5ee5cb57236c?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Investing in the stock market is an unpleasant process</a>&nbsp;&#x1f4c9;
Almost every day, we hear about economic data, financial news, a policy move, a geopolitical event, or some other development that presents a new headwind to the stock market. Rising&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/51b7822e-0615-4e73-ac0c-900d42b25971?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">inflation</a>, higher interest&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/6d1202fd-03d3-4ee8-9188-140de67296b3?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">rates</a>, natural disasters,&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/168c076d-0121-4157-8320-4978424b6166?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">tariffs</a>, war breaking out between our trading partners, viral outbreaks, and so on.
Any of these challenges could hurt business activity or reduce an investor's appetite to take risk in the stock market.
But as history — including recent history — has taught us, it's possible for the economy to flourish and the stock market to rise&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/84950d84-4b3e-48be-abdb-f2a3508b4c15?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">despite</a>&nbsp;emerging headwinds.
These counterintuitive outcomes can often be explained by the most important Latin phrase in investing:&nbsp;Ceteris paribus.
All else equal &#x1f9d0;
Ceteris paribus roughly translates to "all else equal" or "other things held constant."
It's a caveat analysts use when they are examining and discussing the effects of a variable assuming nothing else is changing.
For example: Rising oil prices, ceteris paribus, mean lower earnings because of higher energy costs.
Ceteris paribus gets you clean and simple explanations.
Unfortunately, the world is complicated. And all else is&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/819a500b-0970-4457-a208-812a81dc535c?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">never equal</a>.
What if those higher oil prices are the result of stronger demand from a hotter-than-expected economic activity? This could mean revenue for your business is growing faster than planned, which could more than offset your higher energy costs, which in turn means your earnings are&nbsp;higher.
This is how&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/8ee432b1-d9d7-489f-8ca8-30b74dfb9026?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">I've been discussing</a>&nbsp;evolving expectations for Fed rate cuts for&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/037c573e-9ec2-4060-9d0a-ed3d284da665?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">more than a year</a>. Fewer rate cuts, ceteris paribus, may be considered hawkish for stocks. But these lowered expectations have come amid better-than-expected economic data, which has fueled earnings growth and sent stock prices up and to the right.
TKer subscribers have seen this language used frequently when we've quoted analysts addressing emerging challenges (emphasis added):
"In general, we estimate every 10% rise in the USD translates to a 3% hit to EPS,&nbsp;all else equal." &#8211;&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/d185049b-90f8-48aa-b551-135ec9d7c765?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BofA, January 2025</a>
"We estimate that each 1 percentage point change in the statutory domestic tax rate would shift S&amp;P 500 EPS by slightly less than 1%, or approximately $2 of 2025 S&amp;P 500 EPS,&nbsp;all else equal." &#8211;&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/b3a6d6a1-7c80-4856-b462-21b1d841b13b?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Goldman Sachs, Sept. 2024</a>
"Through the lens of our EPS model a 10% rise in oil would boost S&amp;P 500 EPS by roughly 1%,&nbsp;all else equal." &#8211;&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/24f566ae-012f-4223-9dc5-5ab22760f990?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Goldman Sachs, April 2024</a>
"[C]omparing today&#8217;s valuation to its prior multiples may be more punitive in that today&#8217;s market is more asset-light, labor-light and debt-light than prior cycles and Corporate America&#8217;s renewed focus on efficiency argues for a lower equity risk premium&nbsp;all else equal." &#8211;&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/e2ae4e5c-9af1-4132-b184-bc7c043201fb?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">BofA, October, 2024</a>
"The S&amp;P 500 effective tax rate would need to rise from 20% today to roughly 28% in 20 years to offset the potential earnings boost from AI adoption,&nbsp;all else equal." &#8211;&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/9b4506e6-d8cb-48b0-964d-5336e42a68c8?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">Goldman Sachs, June 2023</a>
"The impact from a 1% buyback tax is two-fold: 1) reduction in earnings from paying the new tax; 2) reduction in overall gross buybacks (all else equal) to compensate for the tax and thus a smaller reduction in ‘S' within EPS." &#8211;&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/b7858888-c76f-43d9-9f51-b3a2c9049e80?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">JPMorgan, September 2022</a>
To be clear, ceteris paribus also means there could be other negative developments that aren't being considered, not just positive ones. Again, the world is complicated.
But in recent months and years, ceteris paribus has frequently been a reminder that even though we are witnessing challenges emerge, there's also a lot of things we're not talking about that could go right.
I've made this point a couple times. (See<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/97749e35-30d7-4e9b-8131-8acc346c6a1c?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&nbsp;here</a>&nbsp;and<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/2b133219-6c61-403e-aa92-a2488a85140d?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">&nbsp;here</a>.)
Notably, see the April 10, 2022 TKer:&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/6a0a161c-5b44-4a11-ba44-2a43cb611ba9?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">The wrong question — and the right one — to ask about earnings headwinds</a>&nbsp;&#x1f4ac;. From that newsletter:
When a new headwind emerges, investors probably think to themselves: How will this hurt the earnings of the companies I'm invested in?
… The problem is we're asking the wrong question.
… The right question is: Can the companies I'm invested in deliver on earnings?
It's similar to the question above, but it broadens the scope of the inquiry to consider more than just the negative impacts of just the unfavorable developments.
Simply put, investors should not be thinking about the effects of some development in isolation. It needs to be considered in the context of everything that affects earnings. Because for investors,&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/84950d84-4b3e-48be-abdb-f2a3508b4c15?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">what ultimately matters is whether earnings will keep going up</a>.
Recent developments &#x1f30e;
There's been&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/168c076d-0121-4157-8320-4978424b6166?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">lots of news about new tariffs</a>&nbsp;and the potential for more tariffs down the road. And tariffs are almost&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/1d255635-d710-4534-962f-25696ca3a732?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">universally considered negative</a>&nbsp;for all of the economies involved.
It's a big deal, especially since many companies and analysts&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/d166e2c5-9624-4698-97a0-cfd10e63553e?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">have yet to factor in</a>&nbsp;the impact of tariffs into their earnings forecasts.
"We estimate that 25% tariﬀs on Canada and Mexico plus 10% incremental tariﬀs on China translates into a 2% hit to EPS, all else equal (1.7% from Canada &amp; Mexico and 0.3% from China)," BofA's Savita Subramanian wrote in a Feb. 9 note.
As Subramanian's use of "all else equal" suggests, the situation is more complicated than simply calculating the cost of tariffs when applied to recent trade data. The ultimate effects could be much worse! And we're not even addressing all of the other tariffs that have been threatened in recent days.
But we also know many companies have&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/906096e4-4def-48b7-9e7d-12ede2d6d8f5?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">actively taken steps</a>&nbsp;to blunt the incremental costs of tariffs and work around potential disruptions to global supply chains.
We also know that companies have been reporting earnings that have&nbsp;<a href="https://substack.com/redirect/ad599c78-88a3-41b6-acc2-118c618ff7c4?j=eyJ1IjoiNThoaTNqIn0.oQOskqZ_hj7KyeETRBdER4rAvQcgl0VTn-sq5tqKUD0" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">exceeded expectations</a>. As we assess the effects of tariffs and other challenges that may emerge, we should also be vigilant of the positive things going on that may help keep earnings growing — which in turn would support stock prices going higher.

Equities

Market Summary

The Most Important Latin Phrase In Investing

ServiceNow (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NOW#NYSE">NOW</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 10.6% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 23.42%. Currently, ServiceNow has a market capitalization of $203.39 billion. 
Buying $1000 In NOW: If an investor had bought $1000 of NOW stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $2,795.46 today based on a price of $985.00 for NOW at the time of writing.
<h3>ServiceNow's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739803508_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

$1000 Invested In This Stock 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Macro Economic Events

Economics

Federal Reserve

Fed's Harker Said Unsure What Impact New Government Policies Will Have On Economy

Fed's Harker Sees Labor Markets Largely In Balance; Economy Functioning From Position Of Strength

Fed's Harker Said Sees Inflation Back To 2% Target Over Next Two Years

Fed's Harker Said Fed Policy Stance Should Continue To Lower Inflation; Inflation Elevated And Has Been Sticky Over Recent Months

AstraZeneca's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AZN#NYSE">AZN</a>) short percent of float has risen 12.24% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 16.94 million shares sold short, which is 0.55% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 3.64 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>AstraZeneca Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1739802622_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for AstraZeneca has grown since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to fall in the near-term but traders should be aware that more shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing AstraZeneca's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, AstraZeneca's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.08%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

How Is The Market Feeling About AstraZeneca?

<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/25/02/43562104/bill-gates-was-the-richest-man-in-the-world-for-a-record-18-years-he-says-money-brings-freedom-but-beyond-that-its-the-same-hamburger">Bill Gates</a> is offering a rare look into his childhood in "Source Code", his new memoir. While many know him as the co-founder of Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) and a billionaire philanthropist, his latest book dives into the lesser-known moments of his early years—including a rather unconventional fourth-grade show-and-tell experiment that left one classmate unconscious.
In an Instagram video from his official account promoting "Source Code," Gates shared that as a fourth grader, he wanted to bring something unique for show-and-tell. With some input from his father, he ended up at a slaughterhouse, picking up a fresh cow lung. "I think he was the one who said, ‘We could go to the slaughterhouse and get a cow lung,'" Gates recalled.
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/are-you-rich">Are you rich?</a> Here&#8217;s what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.</li>
<li>Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl"> you can become an investor for $0.80 per share today.</a></li>
</ul>
So, armed with a cow lung wrapped in a white sheet, young Gates walked into his classroom, ready to impress—or horrify—his classmates. "When I unwrapped it, it was a mixture of awe and disgust," he said, adding that he didn't bother with gloves. He then demonstrated how lungs expand when filled with air, much to the dismay of at least one student. "One girl fainted," he revealed, laughing.
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">‘Get That Thing Out of Here'</h2>
Even the teacher wasn't sure what to do with Gates' bold presentation. "Hey, that was great, but get that thing out of here," she reportedly told him. Looking back, Gates considers it a success. "I think my experiment at school was a big hit," he said.
The story is just one of many childhood experiences Gates shares in "Source Code." The memoir isn't just a collection of quirky anecdotes—it also sheds light on how his early personality and <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/25/02/43495161/more-than-half-of-bill-gates-portfolio-is-tied-up-in-just-two-stocks">interests shaped his future</a>.
Trending: ‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">You can invest today for just $0.26/share with a $1000 minimum.</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Childhood of Curiosity and Independence</h2>
On his "Gates Notes" blog, Gates reflected on how writing "Source Code" helped him connect the dots between his early years and his later success. "Some of the moments that I write about, like that Popular Electronics story, are ones I've always known were important in my life. But with many of the most personal moments, I only saw how important they were when I considered them from my perspective now, decades later," he wrote.
Gates described himself as a kid who was "out of step" with most of his peers, often preferring books to socializing. He also acknowledged that he was a challenge for his parents. "I wanted autonomy and resisted my mother's efforts to control me," he admitted, revealing that a therapist eventually helped him understand that <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/12/42438799/bill-gates-predicts-ai-in-the-workforce-will-lead-to-so-much-leisure-time-but-itll-create-a-what-do-we-do-with-all-that-time-problem">independence would come with time</a>.
One of the more difficult stories he shares in "Source Code" is about the death of his best friend when he was 16. "He was brilliant, mature beyond his years, and, unlike most people in my life at the time, he understood me. It was my first experience with death up close, and I'm grateful I got to spend time processing the memories of that tragedy," Gates wrote.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mark-cubans-advice-for-lotto-winners">Many are surprised by Mark Cuban's advice for lotto winners: Cash or annuity?</a>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">A Look Back at His Beginnings</h2>
Now 70 years old, Gates said the timing felt right to reflect on his past. "Microsoft turns 50. So I thought, okay, I should share what luck I had," he said on NBC's "<a href="https://youtu.be/auk6yCpVPv4?si=wODogJY4qFjc4Ltb">Today</a>." "I had amazing parents. You know, the way they let me go out and hike and try out new things. The time I was born. I was just unbelievably lucky."
While "Source Code" focuses on his early years, Gates said that this is just the beginning. "I'll continue this journey and plan to cover my software career in a future book, and eventually I'll write one about my philanthropic work," he said.
For now, "Source Code" gives readers a glimpse into the childhood of a tech pioneer—one who, at 9, was already leaving a lasting impression on his classmates, one fainting spell at a time.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li>How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/tax-deferring-adv"> Tax deferring is their number one strategy</a>.</li>
<li>Inspired by Uber and Airbnb &#8211; Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets &#8211; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.26/share!</a></li>
</ul>

Comments

(OTC:SIRLF) Stock, Quote.Headers.trade-ideas

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga