Metalert (OTC:MLRT) Stock, Quote.Headers.trade-ideas

Metalert Inc is engaged in the designing, development, manufacturing, distribution, and sales of products and services in the GPS and BLE wearable technology personal location and wandering assistive technology business. Its Products and services include GPS SmartSole, Take-Along Tracker 4G, Track My Workforce, Sole Protector for GPS Smart sole, Take-Along Friends & the Invisabelt, Protective Medical devices & supplies, and VeriTap. The company generates revenue from product sales, recurring subscriptions, software, and intellectual property (IP) licensing, fees for custom hardware and software development, professional consulting, and support & maintenance services.

News

Penny Stocks

Exclusives

MLRT

MetAlert, Inc (OTC: MLRT) announced through its 100% wholly owned subsidiary Level 2 Security, has received and delivered its first commercial order for the game-changing GunAlert firearm recovery device from Range USA, which has 40+ locations across 10 states and headquartered in Cinci

EXCLUSIVE: MetAlert Breaks Ground with First Commercial Order of GunAlert from Range USA

Metalert Inc

Netflix's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NFLX#NYSE">NFLX</a>) short percent of float has fallen 4.68% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 6.90 million shares sold short, which is 1.63% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.58 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Netflix Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737387923_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Netflix has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Netflix's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Netflix's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 8.05%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Short Sellers

Short Ideas

Trading Ideas

NFLX

Peering Into Netflix's Recent Short Interest

First American Financial's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FAF#NYSE">FAF</a>) short percent of float has fallen 18.59% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 1.26 million shares sold short, which is 1.27% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 2.45 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>First American Financial Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737387918_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for First American Financial has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing First American Financial's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, First American Financial's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 2.06%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Peering Into First American Financial's Recent Short Interest

Walmart's (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WMT#NYSE">WMT</a>) short percent of float has fallen 12.9% since its last report. The company recently reported that it has 34.85 million shares sold short, which is 0.81% of all regular shares that are available for trading. Based on its trading volume, it would take traders 1.83 days to cover their short positions on average.
<h3>Why Short Interest Matters</h3>
Short interest is the number of shares that have been sold short but have not yet been covered or closed out. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-short-a-stock/">Short selling</a> is when a trader sells shares of a company they do not own, with the hope that the price will fall. Traders make money from short selling if the price of the stock falls and they lose if it rises.
Short interest is important to track because it can act as an indicator of market sentiment towards a particular stock. An increase in short interest can signal that investors have become more bearish, while a decrease in short interest can signal they have become more bullish.
See Also: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/short-interest">List of the most shorted stocks</a>
<h3>Walmart Short Interest Graph (3 Months)</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737387913_0.png" alt="short_fig" />
As you can see from the chart above the percentage of shares that are sold short for Walmart has declined since its last report. This does not mean that the stock is going to rise in the near-term but traders should be aware that less shares are being shorted.
<h3>Comparing Walmart's Short Interest Against Its Peers</h3>
Peer comparison is a popular technique amongst analysts and investors for gauging how well a company is performing. A company's peer is another company that has similar characteristics to it, such as industry, size, age, and financial structure. You can find a company's peer group by reading its 10-K, proxy filing, or by doing your own similarity analysis.
According to <a href="https://pro.benzinga.com/">Benzinga Pro</a>, Walmart's peer group average for short interest as a percentage of float is 4.54%, which means the company has less short interest than most of its peers.
Did you know that increasing short interest can actually be bullish for a stock? <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/how-to-make-money-on-a-short-squeeze/">This post by Benzinga Money explains how you can profit from it.</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and was reviewed by an editor.

Peering Into Walmart's Recent Short Interest

ExlService Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EXLS#NASDAQ">EXLS</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 13.51% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 26.21%. Currently, ExlService Holdings has a market capitalization of $7.59 billion. 
Buying $100 In EXLS: If an investor had bought $100 of EXLS stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $319.66 today based on a price of $47.15 for EXLS at the time of writing.
<h3>ExlService Holdings's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737387908_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

EXLS

$100 Invested In ExlService Holdings 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

In the current session, the stock is trading at $552.19, after a 1.05% increase. Over the past month, Ameriprise Finl Inc. (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AMP#NYSE">AMP</a>) stock increased by 2.49%, and in the past year, by 42.39%. With performance like this, long-term shareholders are optimistic but others are more likely to look into the price-to-earnings ratio to see if the stock might be overvalued.

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737387011_0.png" alt="Past Year Chart" />

<h3>How Does Ameriprise Finl P/E Compare to Other Companies?</h3>
The P/E ratio is used by long-term shareholders to assess the company's market performance against aggregate market data, historical earnings, and the industry at large. A lower P/E could indicate that shareholders do not expect the stock to perform better in the future or it could mean that the company is undervalued. 
Compared to the aggregate P/E ratio of the 43.31 in the Capital Markets industry, Ameriprise Finl Inc. has a lower P/E ratio of 20.89. Shareholders might be inclined to think that the stock might perform worse than it's industry peers. It's also possible that the stock is undervalued. 

<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737387011_1.png" alt="Guage" />

In summary, while the price-to-earnings ratio is a valuable tool for investors to evaluate a company's market performance, it should be used with caution. A low P/E ratio can be an indication of undervaluation, but it can also suggest weak growth prospects or financial instability. Moreover, the P/E ratio is just one of many metrics that investors should consider when making investment decisions, and it should be evaluated alongside other financial ratios, industry trends, and qualitative factors. By taking a comprehensive approach to analyzing a company's financial health, investors can make well-informed decisions that are more likely to lead to successful outcomes.

Intraday Update

Markets

Price Over Earnings Overview: Ameriprise Finl

Just hours before Donald Trump takes the oath of office for his second term, markets are dialing back expectations for <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/donald-trump">an immediate tariff announcement</a>.
Market odds on Trump enacting new tariffs before Thursday have plunged to just 16% by 9:20 a.m. ET, according to CFTC-regulated prediction platform Kalshi, marking their lowest level since the market opened in December.
According to the <a href="https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-to-lay-out-trade-visionbut-wont-impose-new-tariffs-yet-b9c8378d">Wall Street Journal</a>, Trump plans to issue a memorandum instructing federal agencies to review trade policies and assess U.S. trade relationships with China and neighboring countries. Yet, the directive is expected to fall short of imposing new tariffs on his first day in office.
The news outlet confirmed that it reviewed a summary of the memo and spoke with Trump's advisers about its contents.
<iframe loading="lazy" style="border: 0;" src="https://kalshi.com/external-widgets/events/KXTARIFFSG-25JAN23/markets/KXTARIFFSG-25JAN23?color_scheme=light&amp;widget_size=large" width="100%" height="400px"></iframe>
While tariffs remain a cornerstone of Trump's economic agenda, investors are recalibrating expectations for their timing. This signals that the announcement may come later than initially anticipated.
In currency markets, the U.S. dollar weakened across the board during Monday morning trading. The greenback fell over 1.2% against the euro, and by nearly 1% against the British pound.
&#8220;There will be the risk of a correction in the dollar should it look like Trump will be more selective on tariffs after all – but that should probably come at a later stage,&#8221; said Francesco Pesole, ING forex analyst. 
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Delayed Tariff Timing? Market Signals Caution</h2>
Trump pledged to enact a 25% tariff on imports from Mexico and Canada, two of the United States' largest trading partners as soon as he takes office on January 20, 2025. 
Yet, Goldman Sachs analyst Kamakshya Trivedi highlighted that investors may be taking Trump's "Day 1 pledges too literally,&#8221; pointing out that many early executive orders tend to be symbolic or focus on rolling back previous policies rather than introducing major new initiatives.
The delay in tariff expectations is also being influenced by concerns over financial market stability. 
Alfonso Peccatiello, chief investment officer of macro hedge fund Palinuro, warned that aggressive tariffs could spark an inflationary shock, pushing bond yields higher as investors demand greater risk premiums. 
If tariffs are perceived as inflationary, the Federal Reserve could face renewed pressure to keep monetary policy restrictive, potentially derailing market hopes for interest rate cuts.
Peccatiello outlined a possible tariff framework under Trump's second term:
<ul>
<li>A 10% global tariff across all imports</li>
<li>A gradual escalation of tariffs on China starting at 2.5% per month with no predetermined end date</li>
<li>A 25% tariff on Canadian and European imports, with the potential for further increases.</li>
</ul>
Such a scenario would catch markets off guard, Peccatiello said. He predicts that over the next few weeks, the euro could fall below parity against the dollar. The U.S. dollar-to-Canadian dollar exchange rate could also surge toward 1.50, while bond markets could experience an initial rally before stabilizing. Lastly, equity markets could see a sharp but temporary pullback.
<h3 class="wp-block-heading">Stock Market Implications: Short-Term Volatility, Long-Term Opportunity?</h3>
Veteran strategist Ed Yardeni believes that while initial equity market reactions could be volatile, any pullbacks may be short-lived buying opportunities.
Trump has positioned tariffs as a major revenue generator. He referred to his proposed "External Revenue Service" as a key tool for boosting government income. Estimates suggest that an across-the-board 10% to 20% tariff could generate between $400 billion and $850 billion annually.
Yet, these projections assume that tariffs do not trigger retaliatory trade actions or <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/11/41737933/trump-tariff-proposed-may-cost-americans-78b-in-spending-study">weaken consumer spending</a>. Both outcomes could offset any fiscal gains.
Read now: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/government/regulations/25/01/43068639/betting-markets-brace-for-wave-of-executive-orders-on-trump-day-1-immigration-tariffs-top-issues-on-the-table">Betting Markets Brace For Wave Of Executive Orders On Trump Day 1: Immigration, Tariffs Top Issues On The Table</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Government

Macro Economic Events

Regulations

Econ #s

Economics

Market Bets On Trump's Tariff Announcement Plummet, Dollar Falls: What's Going On?

Inside a Nuuk hotel meeting room, Donald Trump Jr.&#8217;s attempt to gauge local support for his father&#8217;s Greenland takeover plan fell flat. 
According to a report by The Economist, his team gathered what locals describe as a handful of homeless residents, lured by promises of campaign merchandise and free meals at an upscale restaurant.
The staged event creates friction with genuine local sentiment across Greenland&#8217;s capital. &#8220;He&#8217;s scary,&#8221; Ruth, a cultural center worker, told The Economist. &#8220;We don&#8217;t want him here.&#8221; She cited America&#8217;s treatment of Alaska&#8217;s indigenous populations as a key concern for Greenland&#8217;s majority Inuit population.
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li>The average American couple has saved this much money for retirement —<a href="http://www.benzinga.com/money/smartasset"> How do you compare</a>?</li>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/qnetic-2">This 12,000 RPM Spinning Battery With Over $100 Million In LOIs Could Be The Missing Link For Green Energy — Here&#8217;s Why Early Investors Are Flocking To Invest Before Funding Closes</a></li>
</ul>
Trump Jr.&#8217;s <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/global/25/01/42857403/trump-sends-don-jr-on-mission-to-get-the-deal-done-and-make-greenland-part-of-our-nation">visit comes as tensions rise over the island&#8217;s future</a>. While some residents see potential economic benefits in American partnership, most reject outright U.S. control. &#8220;I fear that our language would disappear very quickly,&#8221; Jens Danielsen told Greenland&#8217;s public broadcaster KNR, expressing preference for continued Danish ties.
The debate touches raw nerves about colonialism and independence.&nbsp;
According to recent polling cited by The Economist, nearly two-thirds of Greenlanders support eventual independence from Denmark, though they remain divided over the timing and economic implications. Danish subsidies currently fund over half of Greenland&#8217;s government budget.
Some residents view Trump&#8217;s interest as leverage for greater autonomy. &#8220;Everything is just getting more and more expensive here. Goods from Denmark are extremely expensive, so of course the USA seems more attractive,&#8221; Karen Kielsen, a cleaning assistant, told KNR.
See Also: ‘Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">You can invest today for just $0.26/share with a $1000 minimum.</a>
Greenland&#8217;s pro-independence Prime Minister Múte Egede took a firm stance at a Copenhagen press conference. &#8220;We don&#8217;t want to be Danes. We don&#8217;t want to be Americans. We want to be Greenlanders,&#8221; he said. Student Imaakka Boassen offered a different perspective to KNR. &#8220;There are so many Danes in leading positions in Greenland, but when we live in Greenland, it should be Greenlanders who lead,&#8221; he said, reflecting the growing frustration with Danish influence.
With parliamentary elections approaching in April, independence dominates political discussion. Some lawmakers, like Kuno Fencker, envision potential security partnerships with Denmark and America, similar to arrangements in Pacific island nations.
The debate continues as <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/global/25/01/42864556/trump-does-not-rule-out-military-force-to-acquire-panama-canal-greenland-we-need-them-for-economic-security">Trump refuses to rule out using military</a> or economic pressure to gain control of the strategic Arctic territory and its valuable mineral deposits.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li>It&#8217;s no wonder Jeff Bezos holds over $70 million in art — <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/masterworks">this alternative asset has outpaced the S&amp;P 500 since 1995, delivering an average annual return of 11.4%. Here&#8217;s how everyday investors are getting started.</a></li>
<li>Inspired by Uber and Airbnb &#8211; Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets &#8211; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.26/share!</a></li>
</ul>

Startups

'We Don't Want To Be Americans' – Greenlanders Speak Out On Trump's Plan

Domino's Pizza (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DPZ#NASDAQ">DPZ</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 10 years by 4.34% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 15.76%. Currently, Domino's Pizza has a market capitalization of $14.75 billion. 
Buying $100 In DPZ: If an investor had bought $100 of DPZ stock 10 years ago, it would be worth $432.80 today based on a price of $427.00 for DPZ at the time of writing.
<h3>Domino's Pizza's Performance Over Last 10 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737386108_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Here's How Much $100 Invested In Domino's Pizza 10 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

As Donald Trump takes office as U.S. president on Monday, his meme coin (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/">TRUMP</a>) plummeted in value, while Melania Trump's (CRYPTO: MELANIA) surged by nearly 40% within 24 hours, igniting discussions about the growing power of crypto, and the <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/01/43062997/exclusive-how-donald-trumps-crypto-plans-will-bitcoin-xrp-solana">potential for wider adoption.</a>
What Happened: According to data from CoinGecko, MELANIA experienced a dramatic increase in value, surging nearly 40% within 24 hours.
The token&#8217;s price peaked at just over $13, before settling around $8.74 at last check on Monday. MELANIA also saw a massive leap in 24-hour trading volume, jumping from $1.33 billion on Jan. 19 to $7.6 billion on Jan. 20. 
With these gains, the market capitalization reached $1.54 billion, placing it among the top 100 crypto assets.
In contrast, the Official Trump meme coin saw a decline in value. At last check on Monday, the token hovered at around $52, down 11.4%. The all-time high is $72.42. 
However, this dip did not deter traders. Trading volume exceeded $47 billion on the same day. It&#8217;s now placed among the top 20 crypto assets by market capitalization, with a valuation of roughly $10 billion.
These movements have prompted a variety of expert analyses. 
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/25/01/43082005/market-to-seek-further-information-on-utilization-of-80-trump-token-supply-says-bernstein">Market Seeks Further Information On Utilization Of 80% TRUMP Token Supply: Report</a>
QCP Capital stated that on the "global reach and speed at which TRUMP surged." It&#8217;s a sign of a "paradigm shift in capital formation" and evidence that crypto is increasingly mainstream, the firm noted.
They also speculated that the Solana blockchain might be viewed more favorably by regulators following Trump&#8217;s launch of his memecoin on the platform. The launch could expedite the approval of a Solana (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/sol/usd">SOL</a>) exchange-traded fund, or ETF.
QCP Capital further posited that such launches are likely to attract significant retail inflows, and that Bitcoin (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/btc/usd">BTC</a>) appeared poised to break higher based on funding rates on Deribit. 
The firm suggests the launch of the TRUMP token is viewed by both retail investors and institutions as evidence of a pro-crypto stance by the new President.
Presto Research offered another perspective, stating that Trump is "serious about crypto," viewing the launch as "an attack on Wall Street's monopoly by legitimizing online capital formation." 
They emphasized the need for traditional finance to embrace blockchain technology, or face potential marginalization. 
Solana is experiencing a similar "2017 Ethereum (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/eth/usd">ETH</a>) moment,&#8221; the experts said.
They likened the hype surrounding the token to the ICO craze of 2017. Like Ethereum, the TRUMP launch has cemented Solana's status as a serious contender in the blockchain space.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/01/43065531/coinbase-launches-bitcoin-backed-loans-for-us-users">Coinbase Launches Bitcoin-Backed Loans For US Users</a></li>
</ul>
Image: Shutterstock

Coverage of Bitcoin, Etherum, Ripple and all the latest digital currencies.

Cryptocurrency

$BTC

$ETH

$SOL

$TRUMP

TRUMP

Melania Rises, Official Trump Falls: Experts Say Meme Coins Signal 'Paradigm Shift' And Potential Blow To TradFi

In today's rapidly evolving and fiercely competitive business landscape, it is crucial for investors and industry analysts to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will undertake an in-depth industry comparison, assessing Apple (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/AAPL#NASDAQ">AAPL</a>) alongside its primary competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry. By meticulously examining crucial financial indicators, market positioning, and growth potential, we aim to provide valuable insights to investors and shed light on company's performance within the industry.
<h3>Apple Background</h3>
Apple is among the largest companies in the world, with a broad portfolio of hardware and software products targeted at consumers and businesses. Apple's iPhone makes up a majority of the firm sales, and Apple's other products like Mac, iPad, and Watch are designed around the iPhone as the focal point of an expansive software ecosystem. Apple has progressively worked to add new applications, like streaming video, subscription bundles, and augmented reality. The firm designs its own software and semiconductors while working with subcontractors like Foxconn and TSMC to build its products and chips. Slightly less than half of Apple's sales come directly through its flagship stores, with a majority of sales coming indirectly through partnerships and distribution.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Apple Inc</td>
<td>37.54</td>
<td>60.27</td>
<td>8.99</td>
<td>23.83%</td>
<td>$32.5</td>
<td>$43.88</td>
<td>6.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co</td>
<td>12.13</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>1.04</td>
<td>5.72%</td>
<td>$1.44</td>
<td>$2.61</td>
<td>15.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>NetApp Inc</td>
<td>22.10</td>
<td>27.35</td>
<td>3.92</td>
<td>32.84%</td>
<td>$0.44</td>
<td>$1.18</td>
<td>6.15%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Western Digital Corp</td>
<td>70.60</td>
<td>1.91</td>
<td>1.50</td>
<td>4.28%</td>
<td>$0.86</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>48.91%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pure Storage Inc</td>
<td>167.74</td>
<td>15.13</td>
<td>7.57</td>
<td>4.44%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.58</td>
<td>8.94%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Super Micro Computer Inc</td>
<td>15.49</td>
<td>3.33</td>
<td>1.25</td>
<td>6.68%</td>
<td>$0.4</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>37.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eastman Kodak Co</td>
<td>10.47</td>
<td>0.60</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>1.34%</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>$0.04</td>
<td>-2.97%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Turtle Beach Corp</td>
<td>60.06</td>
<td>3.67</td>
<td>1.11</td>
<td>3.3%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>59.51%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>AstroNova Inc</td>
<td>23.75</td>
<td>0.99</td>
<td>0.60</td>
<td>0.26%</td>
<td>$0.0</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>7.65%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>47.79</td>
<td>6.78</td>
<td>2.2</td>
<td>7.36%</td>
<td>$0.41</td>
<td>$0.82</td>
<td>22.64%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After a detailed analysis of Apple, the following trends become apparent: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 37.54, which is 0.79x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
With a Price to Book ratio of 60.27, which is 8.89x the industry average, Apple might be considered overvalued in terms of its book value, as it is trading at a higher multiple compared to its industry peers.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 8.99, which is 4.09x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 23.83% is 16.47% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $32.5 Billion, which is 79.27x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
Compared to its industry, the company has higher gross profit of $43.88 Billion, which indicates 53.51x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 6.07% is significantly lower compared to the industry average of 22.64%. This indicates a potential fall in the company's sales performance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385338_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When comparing Apple with its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be observed:
<ul>
<li>
Apple is positioned in the middle in terms of the debt-to-equity ratio compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
This suggests a balanced financial structure, where the company maintains a moderate level of debt while also relying on equity financing with a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.87.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Apple in the Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals industry, the PE, PB, and PS ratios indicate that the stock is relatively undervalued compared to its peers. However, the high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and low revenue growth suggest that Apple is efficiently utilizing its resources and generating strong profits, despite slower revenue growth. Overall, Apple's financial performance is solid, with room for potential growth in the future.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

AAPL

Understanding Apple's Position In Technology Hardware, Storage &amp; Peripherals Industry Compared To Competitors

In today's fast-paced and highly competitive business world, it is crucial for investors and industry followers to conduct comprehensive company evaluations. In this article, we will delve into an extensive industry comparison, evaluating Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/META#NASDAQ">META</a>) in relation to its major competitors in the Interactive Media &amp; Services industry. By closely examining key financial metrics, market standing, and growth prospects, our objective is to provide valuable insights and highlight company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Meta Platforms Background</h3>
Meta is the largest social media company in the world, boasting close to 4 billion monthly active users worldwide. The firm's "Family of Apps," its core business, consists of Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, and WhatsApp. End users can leverage these applications for a variety of different purposes, from keeping in touch with friends to following celebrities and running digital businesses for free. Meta packages customer data, gleaned from its application ecosystem and sells ads to digital advertisers. While the firm has been investing heavily in its Reality Labs business, it remains a very small part of Meta's overall sales.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Meta Platforms Inc</td>
<td>28.85</td>
<td>9.38</td>
<td>10.26</td>
<td>9.77%</td>
<td>$22.06</td>
<td>$33.21</td>
<td>18.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alphabet Inc</td>
<td>25.58</td>
<td>7.52</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>8.55%</td>
<td>$35.74</td>
<td>$51.79</td>
<td>15.09%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Baidu Inc</td>
<td>10.77</td>
<td>0.80</td>
<td>1.55</td>
<td>2.98%</td>
<td>$9.27</td>
<td>$17.16</td>
<td>-2.58%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Pinterest Inc</td>
<td>94.97</td>
<td>7.10</td>
<td>6.08</td>
<td>1.0%</td>
<td>$-0.0</td>
<td>$0.71</td>
<td>17.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Kanzhun Ltd</td>
<td>31.56</td>
<td>3.01</td>
<td>6.50</td>
<td>3.18%</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>$1.6</td>
<td>18.98%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ZoomInfo Technologies Inc</td>
<td>339.33</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>3.11</td>
<td>1.35%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.26</td>
<td>-3.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Yelp Inc</td>
<td>24.71</td>
<td>3.61</td>
<td>2.10</td>
<td>5.21%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.33</td>
<td>4.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>JOYY Inc</td>
<td>12.86</td>
<td>0.43</td>
<td>1.18</td>
<td>1.17%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.21</td>
<td>-1.48%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ziff Davis Inc</td>
<td>40.34</td>
<td>1.32</td>
<td>1.78</td>
<td>-2.68%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.3</td>
<td>3.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Weibo Corp</td>
<td>6.42</td>
<td>0.64</td>
<td>1.38</td>
<td>3.78%</td>
<td>$0.14</td>
<td>$0.37</td>
<td>5.05%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Tripadvisor Inc</td>
<td>60.23</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>4.33%</td>
<td>$0.1</td>
<td>$0.48</td>
<td>-0.19%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Hello Group Inc</td>
<td>7.47</td>
<td>0.79</td>
<td>0.89</td>
<td>4.03%</td>
<td>$0.56</td>
<td>$1.05</td>
<td>-12.1%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>59.48</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>3.0</td>
<td>2.99%</td>
<td>$4.21</td>
<td>$6.75</td>
<td>4.12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>After thoroughly examining Meta Platforms, the following trends can be inferred: 
<ul>
<li>
With a Price to Earnings ratio of 28.85, which is 0.49x less than the industry average, the stock shows potential for growth at a reasonable price, making it an interesting consideration for market participants.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 9.38 relative to the industry average by 3.49x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 10.26, which is 3.42x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The Return on Equity (ROE) of 9.77% is 6.78% above the industry average, highlighting efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.06 Billion, which is 5.24x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $33.21 Billion, which indicates 4.92x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 18.87% is notably higher compared to the industry average of 4.12%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385330_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By considering the Debt-to-Equity ratio, Meta Platforms can be compared to its top 4 peers, leading to the following observations:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, Meta Platforms is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.3.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Meta Platforms, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest the market values the company's assets and sales highly. In terms of ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth, Meta Platforms outperforms its industry peers, reflecting strong financial performance and growth potential.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Evaluating Meta Platforms Against Peers In Interactive Media &amp; Services Industry

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Microsoft (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/MSFT#NASDAQ">MSFT</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Software industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Microsoft Background</h3>
Microsoft develops and licenses consumer and enterprise software. It is known for its Windows operating systems and Office productivity suite. The company is organized into three equally sized broad segments: productivity and business processes (legacy Microsoft Office, cloud-based Office 365, Exchange, SharePoint, Skype, LinkedIn, Dynamics), intelligence cloud (infrastructure- and platform-as-a-service offerings Azure, Windows Server OS, SQL Server), and more personal computing (Windows Client, Xbox, Bing search, display advertising, and Surface laptops, tablets, and desktops).
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Microsoft Corp</td>
<td>35.06</td>
<td>10.97</td>
<td>12.48</td>
<td>8.87%</td>
<td>$38.23</td>
<td>$45.49</td>
<td>16.04%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Oracle Corp</td>
<td>39.01</td>
<td>32.46</td>
<td>8.26</td>
<td>25.66%</td>
<td>$5.75</td>
<td>$9.97</td>
<td>8.64%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ServiceNow Inc</td>
<td>164.67</td>
<td>23.48</td>
<td>20.98</td>
<td>4.81%</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>$2.21</td>
<td>22.25%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Palo Alto Networks Inc</td>
<td>45.96</td>
<td>19.67</td>
<td>15.18</td>
<td>6.33%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$1.58</td>
<td>13.88%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CrowdStrike Holdings Inc</td>
<td>712.51</td>
<td>29.27</td>
<td>24.29</td>
<td>-0.57%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.76</td>
<td>28.52%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Fortinet Inc</td>
<td>47.26</td>
<td>79.38</td>
<td>12.70</td>
<td>90.26%</td>
<td>$0.66</td>
<td>$1.24</td>
<td>13.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Gen Digital Inc</td>
<td>27.60</td>
<td>8.03</td>
<td>4.47</td>
<td>7.92%</td>
<td>$0.51</td>
<td>$0.78</td>
<td>3.07%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monday.Com Ltd</td>
<td>559.56</td>
<td>12.35</td>
<td>13.64</td>
<td>-1.28%</td>
<td>$-0.02</td>
<td>$0.23</td>
<td>32.67%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dolby Laboratories Inc</td>
<td>30.11</td>
<td>3.13</td>
<td>6.19</td>
<td>2.39%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>4.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CommVault Systems Inc</td>
<td>41.04</td>
<td>25.45</td>
<td>8.13</td>
<td>5.56%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.19</td>
<td>16.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QXO Inc</td>
<td>24.05</td>
<td>1.24</td>
<td>21.91</td>
<td>-0.21%</td>
<td>$-0.03</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>-2.0%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualys Inc</td>
<td>30.14</td>
<td>11.11</td>
<td>8.64</td>
<td>10.53%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Teradata Corp</td>
<td>36.47</td>
<td>23.73</td>
<td>1.71</td>
<td>32.0%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.27</td>
<td>0.46%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Progress Software Corp</td>
<td>34.26</td>
<td>6.42</td>
<td>3.95</td>
<td>6.88%</td>
<td>$0.06</td>
<td>$0.15</td>
<td>2.11%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SolarWinds Corp</td>
<td>63.86</td>
<td>1.76</td>
<td>3.07</td>
<td>0.94%</td>
<td>$0.07</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>5.5%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>132.61</td>
<td>19.82</td>
<td>10.94</td>
<td>13.66%</td>
<td>$0.6</td>
<td>$1.28</td>
<td>11.24%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>When conducting a detailed analysis of Microsoft, the following trends become clear: 
<ul>
<li>
At 35.06, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.26x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
Considering a Price to Book ratio of 10.97, which is well below the industry average by 0.55x, the stock may be undervalued based on its book value compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The stock's relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 12.48, surpassing the industry average by 1.14x, may indicate an aspect of overvaluation in terms of sales performance.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower Return on Equity (ROE) of 8.87%, which is 4.79% below the industry average. This indicates potential inefficiency in utilizing equity to generate profits, which could be attributed to various factors.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $38.23 Billion, which is 63.72x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
With higher gross profit of $45.49 Billion, which indicates 35.54x above the industry average, the company demonstrates stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 16.04% exceeds the industry average of 11.24%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385322_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio measures the financial leverage of a company by evaluating its debt relative to its equity.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
When examining Microsoft in comparison to its top 4 peers with respect to the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following information becomes apparent:
<ul>
<li>
Among its top 4 peers, Microsoft has a stronger financial position with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.21.
</li>
<li>
This indicates that the company relies less on debt financing and maintains a more favorable balance between debt and equity, which can be viewed positively by investors.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Microsoft in the Software industry, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The PB ratio is also low, suggesting a possible bargain opportunity. However, the PS ratio is high, signaling rich valuation based on revenue. In terms of profitability, Microsoft's ROE is low, while EBITDA and gross profit margins are high, reflecting strong operational performance. Additionally, the high revenue growth rate indicates a promising outlook for the company within the sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

MSFT

Comparative Study: Microsoft And Industry Competitors In Software Industry

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating NVIDIA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/NVDA#NASDAQ">NVDA</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>NVIDIA Background</h3>
Nvidia is a leading developer of graphics processing units. Traditionally, GPUs were used to enhance the experience on computing platforms, most notably in gaming applications on PCs. GPU use cases have since emerged as important semiconductors used in artificial intelligence. Nvidia not only offers AI GPUs, but also a software platform, Cuda, used for AI model development and training. Nvidia is also expanding its data center networking solutions, helping to tie GPUs together to handle complex workloads.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>NVIDIA Corp</td>
<td>52.73</td>
<td>49.64</td>
<td>29.32</td>
<td>31.13%</td>
<td>$22.86</td>
<td>$26.16</td>
<td>93.61%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd</td>
<td>35.04</td>
<td>9.23</td>
<td>13.88</td>
<td>8.36%</td>
<td>$555.05</td>
<td>$439.35</td>
<td>38.95%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Broadcom Inc</td>
<td>177.84</td>
<td>15.89</td>
<td>21.25</td>
<td>6.49%</td>
<td>$7.29</td>
<td>$9.0</td>
<td>51.2%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Advanced Micro Devices Inc</td>
<td>104.81</td>
<td>3.37</td>
<td>7.97</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.55</td>
<td>$3.42</td>
<td>17.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Qualcomm Inc</td>
<td>18.06</td>
<td>6.83</td>
<td>4.68</td>
<td>11.46%</td>
<td>$3.21</td>
<td>$5.78</td>
<td>18.69%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Texas Instruments Inc</td>
<td>34.83</td>
<td>9.90</td>
<td>10.95</td>
<td>7.86%</td>
<td>$2.09</td>
<td>$2.47</td>
<td>-8.41%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ARM Holdings PLC</td>
<td>243.88</td>
<td>25.79</td>
<td>44.34</td>
<td>1.83%</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>$0.81</td>
<td>4.71%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Micron Technology Inc</td>
<td>29.40</td>
<td>2.44</td>
<td>3.96</td>
<td>4.07%</td>
<td>$4.3</td>
<td>$3.35</td>
<td>84.28%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Analog Devices Inc</td>
<td>65.55</td>
<td>3.03</td>
<td>11.37</td>
<td>1.36%</td>
<td>$1.12</td>
<td>$1.42</td>
<td>-10.06%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Microchip Technology Inc</td>
<td>39.02</td>
<td>4.81</td>
<td>5.56</td>
<td>1.24%</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>$0.67</td>
<td>-48.37%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Monolithic Power Systems Inc</td>
<td>67.27</td>
<td>12.38</td>
<td>14.31</td>
<td>6.35%</td>
<td>$0.17</td>
<td>$0.34</td>
<td>30.59%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ASE Technology Holding Co Ltd</td>
<td>21.28</td>
<td>2.44</td>
<td>1.28</td>
<td>3.16%</td>
<td>$28.59</td>
<td>$26.43</td>
<td>3.85%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>ON Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>13.28</td>
<td>2.65</td>
<td>3.16</td>
<td>4.75%</td>
<td>$0.63</td>
<td>$0.8</td>
<td>-19.21%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>STMicroelectronics NV</td>
<td>10.16</td>
<td>1.26</td>
<td>1.63</td>
<td>1.98%</td>
<td>$0.74</td>
<td>$1.23</td>
<td>-26.63%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>First Solar Inc</td>
<td>16.44</td>
<td>2.69</td>
<td>5.33</td>
<td>4.22%</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>$0.45</td>
<td>10.81%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>United Microelectronics Corp</td>
<td>9.99</td>
<td>1.40</td>
<td>2.24</td>
<td>4.0%</td>
<td>$29.73</td>
<td>$20.43</td>
<td>5.99%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Skyworks Solutions Inc</td>
<td>24.78</td>
<td>2.31</td>
<td>3.53</td>
<td>0.95%</td>
<td>$0.18</td>
<td>$0.43</td>
<td>-15.9%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings Inc</td>
<td>137.28</td>
<td>9.38</td>
<td>14.40</td>
<td>2.67%</td>
<td>$0.05</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>33.47%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Lattice Semiconductor Corp</td>
<td>55.27</td>
<td>11.06</td>
<td>13.89</td>
<td>1.03%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.09</td>
<td>-33.87%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Universal Display Corp</td>
<td>29.54</td>
<td>4.40</td>
<td>10.89</td>
<td>4.29%</td>
<td>$0.08</td>
<td>$0.13</td>
<td>14.57%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>59.67</td>
<td>6.91</td>
<td>10.24</td>
<td>4.08%</td>
<td>$33.46</td>
<td>$27.2</td>
<td>8.01%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through a detailed examination of NVIDIA, we can deduce the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
At 52.73, the stock's Price to Earnings ratio is 0.88x less than the industry average, suggesting favorable growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The elevated Price to Book ratio of 49.64 relative to the industry average by 7.18x suggests company might be overvalued based on its book value.
</li>
<li>
With a relatively high Price to Sales ratio of 29.32, which is 2.86x the industry average, the stock might be considered overvalued based on sales performance.
</li>
<li>
With a Return on Equity (ROE) of 31.13% that is 27.05% above the industry average, it appears that the company exhibits efficient use of equity to generate profits.
</li>
<li>
With lower Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $22.86 Billion, which is 0.68x below the industry average, the company may face lower profitability or financial challenges.
</li>
<li>
The gross profit of $26.16 Billion is 0.96x below that of its industry, suggesting potential lower revenue after accounting for production costs.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of 93.61% exceeds the industry average of 8.01%, indicating strong sales performance and market outperformance.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385314_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio indicates the proportion of debt and equity used by a company to finance its assets and operations.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing NVIDIA in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
When comparing the debt-to-equity ratio, NVIDIA is in a stronger financial position compared to its top 4 peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a lower level of debt relative to its equity, indicating a more favorable balance between the two with a lower debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For NVIDIA, the PE ratio is low compared to peers, indicating potential undervaluation. The high PB and PS ratios suggest strong market sentiment and revenue multiples. A high ROE reflects efficient use of shareholder funds, while low EBITDA and gross profit may indicate operational challenges. The high revenue growth rate signals strong top-line performance relative to industry peers in the Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment sector.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

NVDA

In-Depth Analysis: NVIDIA Versus Competitors In Semiconductors &amp; Semiconductor Equipment Industry

XRP's (CRYPTO: <a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/xrp/usd">XRP</a>) price has increased 6.21% over the past 24 hours to $3.33. Over the past week, XRP has experienced an uptick of over 36.0%, moving from $2.43 to its current price. As it stands right now, the coin's all-time high is $3.40. 
The chart below compares the price movement and volatility for XRP over the past 24 hours (left) to its price movement over the past week (right). The gray bands are Bollinger Bands, measuring the volatility for both the daily and weekly price movements. The wider the bands are, or the larger the gray area is at any given moment, the larger the volatility.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385305_0.png" alt="price_chart" />
The trading volume for the coin has increased 133.0% over the past week. while the overall circulating supply of the coin has decreased 0.42% This puts its current circulating supply at an estimated 57.56% of its max supply, which is 100.00 billion. The current market cap ranking for XRP is #3 at $191.39 billion.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385305_1.png" alt="supply_and_vol" />
<a href="https://www.coingecko.com/en/api">Powered by CoinGecko API</a>
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Movers

$XRP

XRP's Price Increased More Than 6% Within 24 hours

In the fast-paced and cutthroat world of business, conducting thorough company analysis is essential for investors and industry experts. In this article, we will undertake a comprehensive industry comparison, evaluating Williams-Sonoma (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/WSM#NYSE">WSM</a>) in comparison to its major competitors within the Specialty Retail industry. By analyzing crucial financial metrics, market position, and growth potential, our objective is to provide valuable insights for investors and offer a deeper understanding of company's performance in the industry.
<h3>Williams-Sonoma Background</h3>
With a retail and direct-to-consumer presence, Williams-Sonoma is a player in the $300 billion domestic home category and $450 billion international home market, focused on expanding its exposure in the B2B ($80 billion total addressable market), marketplace, and franchise areas. Namesake Williams-Sonoma (160 stores) offers high-end cooking essentials, while Pottery Barn (186) provides casual home accessories. West Elm (122) is an emerging concept for young professionals, and Rejuvenation (11) offers lighting and house parts. Brand extensions include Pottery Barn Kids and PBteen (46) as well as Mark &amp; Graham and Greenrow. Williams-Sonoma also has a business-to-business team that supports projects that range from residential to large-scale commercial.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Company</th>
<th>P/E</th>
<th>P/B</th>
<th>P/S</th>
<th>ROE</th>
<th>EBITDA (in billions)</th>
<th>Gross Profit (in billions)</th>
<th>Revenue Growth</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Williams-Sonoma Inc</td>
<td>23.55</td>
<td>12.86</td>
<td>3.42</td>
<td>11.98%</td>
<td>$0.38</td>
<td>$0.84</td>
<td>-2.86%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Arhaus Inc</td>
<td>20.38</td>
<td>5</td>
<td>1.27</td>
<td>3.15%</td>
<td>$0.03</td>
<td>$0.12</td>
<td>-2.18%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Haverty Furniture Companies Inc</td>
<td>14.03</td>
<td>1.20</td>
<td>0.50</td>
<td>1.6%</td>
<td>$0.01</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-20.17%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Average</td>
<td>17.2</td>
<td>3.1</td>
<td>0.89</td>
<td>2.38%</td>
<td>$0.02</td>
<td>$0.11</td>
<td>-11.18%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<style>
 table {
 width: 100%;
 border-collapse: collapse;
 font-family: Arial, sans-serif;
 font-size: 14px;
 }

 th, td {
 padding: 8px;
 text-align: left;
 }

 th {
 background-color: #293a5a;
 color: #fff;
 text-align: left;
 }

 tr:nth-child(even) {
 background-color: #f2f4f8;
 }

 tr:hover {
 background-color: #e1e4ea;
 }

 td:nth-child(3), td:nth-child(5) {
 text-align: left;
 }

 .dividend-amount {
 font-weight: bold;
 color: #0d6efd;
 }

 .dividend-frequency {
 font-size: 12px;
 color: #6c757d;
 }
 </style>Through an analysis of Williams-Sonoma, we can infer the following trends: 
<ul>
<li>
The current Price to Earnings ratio of 23.55 is 1.37x higher than the industry average, indicating the stock is priced at a premium level according to the market sentiment.
</li>
<li>
It could be trading at a premium in relation to its book value, as indicated by its Price to Book ratio of 12.86 which exceeds the industry average by 4.15x.
</li>
<li>
The Price to Sales ratio of 3.42, which is 3.84x the industry average, suggests the stock could potentially be overvalued in relation to its sales performance compared to its peers.
</li>
<li>
The company has a higher Return on Equity (ROE) of 11.98%, which is 9.6% above the industry average. This suggests efficient use of equity to generate profits and demonstrates profitability and growth potential.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization (EBITDA) of $380 Million, which is 19.0x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and robust cash flow generation.
</li>
<li>
The company has higher gross profit of $840 Million, which indicates 7.64x above the industry average, indicating stronger profitability and higher earnings from its core operations.
</li>
<li>
The company's revenue growth of -2.86% is notably higher compared to the industry average of -11.18%, showcasing exceptional sales performance and strong demand for its products or services.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Debt To Equity Ratio</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385305_0_0.png" alt="debt to equity" />
The debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio is a measure that indicates the level of debt a company has taken on relative to the value of its assets net of liabilities.
Considering the debt-to-equity ratio in industry comparisons allows for a concise evaluation of a company's financial health and risk profile, aiding in informed decision-making.
By analyzing Williams-Sonoma in relation to its top 4 peers based on the Debt-to-Equity ratio, the following insights can be derived:
<ul>
<li>
When compared to its top 4 peers, Williams-Sonoma has a moderate debt-to-equity ratio of 0.69.
</li>
<li>
This implies that the company maintains a balanced financial structure with a reasonable level of debt and an appropriate reliance on equity financing.
</li>
</ul>
<h3>Key Takeaways</h3>
For Williams-Sonoma, the PE, PB, and PS ratios are all high compared to its peers in the Specialty Retail industry, indicating potential overvaluation. On the other hand, Williams-Sonoma's high ROE, EBITDA, gross profit, and revenue growth suggest strong operational performance and growth prospects relative to industry competitors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Competitor Analysis: Evaluating Williams-Sonoma And Competitors In Specialty Retail Industry

As Los Angeles grapples with devastating wildfires, the numbers are staggering: at least 11 lives lost, over 150,000 displaced and damage estimates ranging from $135 billion to $150 billion, according to The Guardian.&nbsp;
The Palisades fire has already cemented its place as one of the most destructive in the city's history, leaving behind a trail of destruction that includes homes, businesses and schools. While insurance companies brace for a wave of claims, it's worth revisiting the late <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/startups/24/10/41120804/charlie-munger-gave-his-family-fortune-to-chinese-warren-buffett-he-flipped-it-into-400-million-back">Charlie Munger's bold stance</a> on self-insurance – a philosophy rooted in practicality, not risk.
Don't Miss:
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/are-you-rich">Are you rich?</a> Here&#8217;s what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy.</li>
<li>Deloitte's fastest-growing software company partners with Amazon, Walmart &amp; Target – <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">Many are rushing to grab 4,000 of its pre-IPO shares for just $0.26/share!</a></li>
</ul>
Munger's Take on Self-Insurance
During a November 2023 Daily Journal shareholder meeting, just weeks before his passing, Munger shared his thoughts on why the wealthy should skip traditional insurance altogether. Speaking with CNBC's Becky Quick, he explained, "I'm a big self-insurer and so is Warren."&nbsp;
He quipped, "It's ridiculous to carry fire insurance on my houses because I can so easily rebuild a house that would burn down. So why would I want to bother fooling around with the claims process?"&nbsp;
For Munger, insurance made sense only for risks you couldn't afford to cover yourself. "You should insure against things you can't afford to pay for yourself. But if you can afford to take the bumps, why would you want to fool around with some insurance company if your house burned down? I would just write a check and rebuild it," he added, emphasizing the inefficiencies, waste and fraud that can come with traditional coverage.
See Also: Can you guess how many Americans successfully retire with $1,000,000 saved?<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/1milsaved"> The percentage may shock you</a>.
Munger explained, "<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/09/40759324/want-to-get-very-rich-charlie-munger-and-warren-buffett-say-you-only-need-3-wonderful-businesses">Once I got rich</a>, I stopped carrying fire insurance on houses. I just self-insured. And that's the right way to do it." When interviewer Quick pointed out that this perspective was surprising given Berkshire Hathaway's vast portfolio of insurance companies, Munger didn't hesitate. "I'd rather tell it the way it is than tell it in a way that helps Berkshire," he replied, staying true to his trademark candor.
The Wildfires Price Tag
Of course, not everyone has the financial cushion to simply "write a check" when disaster strikes. The wildfires sweeping through LA illustrate the scale of destruction that even the wealthiest would find challenging to absorb. Entire neighborhoods have been leveled, with thousands of families depending on insurance payouts to rebuild their lives.
Yet Munger's advice highlights a key takeaway for <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/08/40605821/charlie-munger-said-you-dont-need-to-own-a-lot-of-things-in-order-to-get-rich-but-believed-you-a">high-net-worth individuals</a> and corporations: the importance of evaluating what risks are worth insuring and which ones you can absorb. For Meta, Tesla and other massive companies, self-insurance has become a trend, allowing them to bypass traditional insurers and <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/personal-finance/24/12/42702543/warren-buffett-says-borrowed-money-can-make-you-very-rich-or-be-lethal-warning-it-can-even-bring-an-entire-country-to-its-knees">directly manage their own risks</a>.
Trending: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing —<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/boxabl"> you can become an investor for $0.80 per share today.</a>
Is Self-Insurance for Everyone?
Munger's philosophy isn't about ignoring risk but understanding your capacity to handle it. For most people, insurance remains a lifeline in times of crisis. The idea of facing a $1 million rebuild without coverage is unthinkable for the average family.
But for those who can afford it, self-insurance eliminates middlemen, reduces costs and provides flexibility. Munger believed it also removes the burden of subsidizing fraud, inefficiencies and the overhead costs baked into traditional insurance premiums. "There's a lot of waste you're paying when you buy insurance for the other fellow's frauds," he noted in an October 2023 podcast appearance.&nbsp;
Lessons From the Fires
While the current wildfires are a grim reminder of nature's destructive power, they also underscore the value of preparedness. For most Angelenos, insurance is nonnegotiable, a safeguard against <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/real-estate/24/12/42679481/florida-in-particular-is-going-to-have-huge-problems-mark-cuban-says-1-housing-affordability-issue-is-insurance-not-interest-rates">disasters that are becoming too common</a>. But Munger's perspective offers food for thought, particularly for the wealthy: if you can handle major risks directly, why pay for someone else's inefficiencies?
As the fires continue to burn, recovery will depend on a mix of public and private efforts – insured or otherwise. While Munger's approach may not be a fit for everyone, his emphasis on cutting through inefficiencies and focusing on what truly matters remains <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/are-you-rich">timeless advice</a>, even in the face of disaster.
Read Next:
<ul>
<li>How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you?<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/tax-deferring-adv"> Tax deferring is their number one strategy</a>.</li>
<li>Inspired by Uber and Airbnb &#8211; Deloitte's fastest-growing software company is transforming 7 billion smartphones into income-generating assets &#8211; <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/money/mode-mobile-2">with $1,000 you can invest at just $0.26/share!</a></li>
</ul>

Personal Finance

Charlie Munger Said He And Warren Buffett Skip Insurance And All Rich Should Too – 'I Can So Easily Rebuild A House That Would Burn Down'

Krystal Biotech (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KRYS#NASDAQ">KRYS</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 8.82% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 21.51%. Currently, Krystal Biotech has a market capitalization of $4.24 billion. 
Buying $1000 In KRYS: If an investor had bought $1000 of KRYS stock 5 years ago, it would be worth $2,648.40 today based on a price of $148.39 for KRYS at the time of writing.
<h3>Krystal Biotech's Performance Over Last 5 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737385210_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

KRYS

Here's How Much You Would Have Made Owning Krystal Biotech Stock In The Last 5 Years

The <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs">ETF market is never dull</a>, and 2025 promises to be no exception. 
In a podcast discussion on Bloomberg, The ETF Store, Inc. President Nate Geraci, along with Bloomberg&#8217;s Eric Balchunas and Vilna Hyek shared their thoughts on what lies ahead. Here's a look at the predictions shaping the conversation.
First up: A fee war. Geraci believes we're about to see some serious competition among the biggest S&amp;P 500 ETFs. Vanguard S&amp;P 500 ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/VOO#NYSE">VOO</a>) and iShares Core S&amp;P 500 ETF (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/IVV#NYSE">IVV</a>) are duking it out to become the market favorite. 
With fees already thin at 0.02% and 0.03% respectively, any further cuts could make headlines. "It's about capturing that top spot," said Geraci. Vanguard has a history of passing cost savings to investors as funds grow. It's a win for consumers, but it could squeeze margins for providers.
Also See: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/etfs/sector-etfs/25/01/43001690/exclusive-crypto-commodities-take-center-stage-volatility-2025-direxion-ceo">EXCLUSIVE: Direxion CEO Predicts Crypto, Commodities Will Take Center Stage Amid Volatility In 2025</a>
Coming to the second prediction, Geraci is optimistic that 2025 will bring a wave of approvals for spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs, along with some altcoin-focused funds. Why now? The regulatory environment looks set to become more crypto-friendly, especially with potential leadership changes at the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. 
If Geraci is right, expect a flood of new options for investors looking to ride the crypto wave through ETFs.
Not every innovation, however, is a perfect fit for ETFs. Take private credit ETFs, for instance. While they sound intriguing, Geraci is skeptical. The biggest issue? Private credit is illiquid, and ETFs promise daily liquidity. Throw in potential conflicts of interest — like fund managers acting as both liquidity providers and valuation sources — and it's a recipe for disaster. "The structure just doesn't match the asset," he warned.
Tax efficiency is another trend that's gaining traction. Among those gaining popularity are structures like 351 exchanges, which let investors contribute stocks whose prices have appreciated, to an ETF, without triggering capital gains taxes. These setups aren't just about saving money — they also make ETFs a smarter tool for long-term planning.
Of course, the conversation wouldn't be complete without a word of caution. Leveraged single-stock ETFs have been grabbing attention, but they carry significant risks. Geraci is blunt about it: "It's only a matter of time before one of these implodes." Leveraged ETFs built around sensitive stocks are one sharp dip away from falling off the cliff.
So, what does all this mean for 2025? It's clear that the ETF market is evolving rapidly, with innovation and competition driving the next phase of growth. But as always, investors should keep an eye on the risks. As Geraci put it, "These aren't just investment calls — they're predictions about the forces reshaping the ETF industry." 
Here's hoping 2025 lives up to the hype.
Read Next: 
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.benzinga.com/content/43076066/top-etfs-that-beat-the-market-in-2024-and-could-do-it-again">Top ETFs That Beat the Market in 2024 and Could Do It Again</a></li>
</ul>
Photo: Shutterstock

ETFs

ETFs In 2025: Fee Wars, Crypto Booms, And The Risks Ahead

Booking Holdings (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/BKNG#NASDAQ">BKNG</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 20 years by 22.49% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 30.96%. Currently, Booking Holdings has a market capitalization of $163.06 billion. 
Buying $100 In BKNG: If an investor had bought $100 of BKNG stock 20 years ago, it would be worth $21,877.44 today based on a price of $4926.80 for BKNG at the time of writing.
<h3>Booking Holdings's Performance Over Last 20 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737384307_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

BKNG

$100 Invested In This Stock 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Coherent (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/COHR#NYSE">COHR</a>) has outperformed the market over the past 15 years by 2.15% on an annualized basis producing an average annual return of 14.15%. Currently, Coherent has a market capitalization of $15.45 billion. 
Buying $1000 In COHR: If an investor had bought $1000 of COHR stock 15 years ago, it would be worth $7,035.79 today based on a price of $99.89 for COHR at the time of writing.
<h3>Coherent's Performance Over Last 15 Years</h3>
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2025/1737383408_0.png" alt="comp_fig" />
Finally -- what's the point of all this? The key insight to take from this article is to note how much of a difference compounded returns can make in your cash growth over a period of time.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

COHR

$1000 Invested In This Stock 15 Years Ago Would Be Worth This Much Today

Metalert (MLRT – Research Report) received a Buy rating and a C$0.14 price target from Fundamental Research analyst Siddharth Rajeev on March 15. T...

Comments

Metalert

Metalert (MLRT) Forecast

Metalert (OTC:MLRT) Stock, Quote.Headers.trade-ideas

Popular Channels

Tools & Features

Partners & Contributors

About Benzinga