First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (ARCA: AFMC)

Latest News for First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (ARCA:AFMC)

First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF

Truist Securities analyst David Macdonald maintains Quest Diagnostics (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/DGX#NYSE">DGX</a>) with a Hold and raises the price target from $145 to $150.

News

Price Target

Analyst Ratings

Truist Securities Maintains Hold on Quest Diagnostics, Raises Price Target to $150

The first living recipient of a UThymoKidney, in conjunction with a heart pump implant, is recovering after a successful transplant
This transplant builds on two successful UHeart transplants completed in 2022 and 2023

Biotech

General

UTHR

United Therapeutics Announces Xenothymokidney Transplant

WIIM

BranchOut Food shares are trading higher after the company announced it has expanded its existing relationship with the nation's largest retailer, which brings the total annualized value of commitments from the retailer to over $8 million.

2023 Fiscal Year Financial Highlights
<ul>
<li>Net sales decreased to $1.50 billion, compared to net sales of $1.72 billion in fiscal year 2022.</li>
<li>GMV decreased to $1.81 billion, compared to GMV of $2.20 billion in fiscal year 2022.</li>
<li>Gross profit decreased to $167.6 million, compared to gross profit of $216.7 million in fiscal year 2022.</li>
<li>Net loss increased to $59.0 million, compared to net loss of $57.4 million in fiscal year 2022.</li>
<li>Adjusted EBITDA decreased to ($21.3) million, compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $0.6 million in fiscal year 2022.</li>
</ul>
2023 Fiscal Year Operational Metrics
<ul>
<li>Average order value was $379 for the year ended December 31, 2023, compared to $411 for the prior year.</li>
<li>Active customers, defined as unique customer IDs with at least one item purchased on Newegg platforms in the past 12 months, totaled approximately 2.5 million as of December 31, 2023, a decrease from 2.7 million the prior year.</li>
<li>Repeat purchase rate, the percentage of active customers who made at least two purchases on Newegg platforms during the past 12 months, was 29.2% as of December 31, 2023, compared to 31.3% for the prior year.</li>
</ul>

Earnings

NEGG

Newegg FY23 Revenue $1.5B Vs $1.72B YoY; Average Order Value Was $379 In FY23 Vs $411 In FY22

Beleaguered EV maker Fisker Inc. said on Tuesday that it expects to seek <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/24/03/37766138/teslas-india-entry-hurdle-lifts-fisker-hurtling-toward-bankruptcy-rivian-gets-wall-streets-love-">protection under bankruptcy laws </a>within 30 days if unable to receive waivers from its debt holders or raise enough capital to settle its dues. 
What Happened: The company is seeking to restructure its current debts and discussing financing alternatives, it said in a regulatory filing, while adding that there is no assurance it will be able to do either.
Additionally, the company will reduce its workforce and streamline its operations in a bid to cut costs, it added. &nbsp;
Fisker in February warned that it may not have enough funds to operate over the year. The company's shares were delisted from the New York Stock Exchange in March owing to low share prices and potential investment talks with a major automaker collapsed, leaving Fisker&#8217;s financial future uncertain.
Why It Matters: Fisker&#8217;s cash balance dwindled from $736.5 million at the end of 2022 to $325.5 million by December 2023. The company&nbsp;<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/24/02/37407754/whats-going-on-with-fisker-stock-after-hours" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">reported a net loss</a>&nbsp;of $463.6 million and revenue of $200.1 million for the fourth quarter. Despite producing around 10,200 Ocean SUVs in 2023, Fisker only managed to deliver 4,929 vehicles during the year.&nbsp;
To address inventory and financing issues, Fisker initiated a six-week production pause in March. The company also announced price cuts of as much as $24,000 on its Ocean SUV last month to drive sales.
Fisker is not alone in its troubles. EV maker Canoo Inc. <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/24/04/38036342/ev-maker-canoos-stock-falls-on-mixed-q4-results">warned about its ability to continue as a going concern</a> without additional funding earlier this month. Lordstown Motors <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/06/33017879/lordstown-motors-files-for-bankruptcy-protection">filed for bankruptcy protection </a>last year. 
Check out more of Benzinga's Future Of Mobility coverage by&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/topic/mobility" rel="noreferrer noopener">following this link</a>.
Read More:&nbsp;<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/04/38397845/tesla-will-solve-autonomy-even-if-i-got-kidnapped-by-aliens-tomorrow-says-elon-musk-as-he-reveals-ta">Tesla Will Solve Autonomy ‘Even If I Got Kidnapped By Aliens Tomorrow,' Says Elon Musk As He Reveals Talks With ‘Major Automaker' For FSD Licensing</a>
Image Via Shutterstock

Tech

Fisker To File For Bankruptcy Protection In 30 Days If Unable To Settle Debts Or Raise Capital

Canaccord Genuity analyst Maria Ripps maintains Spotify Technology (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/SPOT#NYSE">SPOT</a>) with a Buy and raises the price target from $330 to $370.

SPOT

Canaccord Genuity Maintains Buy on Spotify Technology, Raises Price Target to $370

CAPR

Capricor Therapeutics Announces Type-B Meeting With FDA For CAP-1002 Program For Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, FDA Feedback Supports Requests For Pre-BLA Meeting And Subsequent Rolling BLA Submission Following Upcoming Q2 Type-B FDA Meeting

Truist Securities analyst Michael Swartz maintains Polaris (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/PII#NYSE">PII</a>) with a Hold and lowers the price target from $96 to $92.

Truist Securities Maintains Hold on Polaris, Lowers Price Target to $92

Canadian Pacific Railway (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/CP#NYSE">CP</a>) reported quarterly earnings of $0.93 per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $0.94 by 1.06 percent. The company reported quarterly sales of $3.52 billion which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $3.54 billion by 0.52 percent. This is a 110.02 percent increase over sales of $1.68 billion the same period last year.

Earnings Misses

Canadian Pacific Railway Q1 2024 Adj EPS CAD$0.93 Misses CAD$0.94 Estimate, Sales CAD$3.52B Miss CAD$3.54B Estimate

SNOW

Snowflake Launches Arctic Enterprise-Grade Large Language Model

Truist Securities analyst Michael Ciarmoli maintains Hexcel (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HXL#NYSE">HXL</a>) with a Buy and lowers the price target from $90 to $88.

Truist Securities Maintains Buy on Hexcel, Lowers Price Target to $88

Analysts' ratings for Guess (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GES#NYSE">GES</a>) over the last quarter vary from bullish to bearish, as provided by 11 analysts.
The following table encapsulates their recent ratings, offering a glimpse into the evolving sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">6</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
The 12-month price targets assessed by analysts reveal further insights, featuring an average target of $31.86, a high estimate of $37.00, and a low estimate of $23.00. This upward trend is apparent, with the current average reflecting a 3.88% increase from the previous average price target of $30.67.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713963672_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The standing of Guess among financial experts is revealed through an in-depth exploration of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeff Lick</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mauricio Serna</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$32.00</td>
<td>$26.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Corey Tarlowe</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$29.00</td>
<td>$24.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$37.00</td>
<td>$32.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$30.00</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Eric Beder</td>
<td>Small Cap Consumer Research</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$32.50</td>
<td>$32.50</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Susan Anderson</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$33.00</td>
<td>$31.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$23.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Guess. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Providing a comprehensive analysis, analysts offer qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Guess compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Guess's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/GES/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Guess analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Discovering Guess: A Closer Look</h2>
Guess? Inc designs, markets distributes, and licenses contemporary apparel and accessories that reflect European fashion sensibilities and American Lifestyle under brands including Guess, Marciano, and G by Guess. The company has five reportable segments: Americas Retail, Americas Wholesale, Europe, Asia, and licensing. Geographically, the company derives maximum revenue from the United States.
<h3>Guess: Delving into Financials</h3>
Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers.
Revenue Growth: Guess's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 31 January, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 8.96%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company stands out with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Guess's net margin surpasses industry standards, highlighting the company's exceptional financial performance. With an impressive 12.79% net margin, the company effectively manages costs and achieves strong profitability.
Return on Equity (ROE): Guess's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 19.01%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Guess's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 4.5%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 1.7, Guess adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>What Are Analyst Ratings?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Analyst Ratings For Guess

In the latest quarter, 7 analysts provided ratings for East West Bancorp (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/EWBC#NASDAQ">EWBC</a>), showcasing a mix of bullish and bearish perspectives.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Analysts have recently evaluated East West Bancorp and provided 12-month price targets. The average target is $91.71, accompanied by a high estimate of $106.00 and a low estimate of $88.00. Surpassing the previous average price target of $83.00, the current average has increased by 10.49%.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713963663_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
In examining recent analyst actions, we gain insights into how financial experts perceive East West Bancorp. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>David Chiaverini</td>
<td>Wedbush</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Elan Zanger</td>
<td>Jefferies</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
<td>$86.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Brandon King</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Ben Gerlinger</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$91.00</td>
<td>$85.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dave Rochester</td>
<td>Compass Point</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
<td>$83.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jared Shaw</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$106.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Manan Gosalia</td>
<td>Morgan Stanley</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Overweight</td>
<td>$89.00</td>
<td>$76.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to East West Bancorp. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of East West Bancorp compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of East West Bancorp's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Considering these analyst evaluations in conjunction with other financial indicators can offer a comprehensive understanding of East West Bancorp's market position. Stay informed and make well-informed decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/EWBC/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on East West Bancorp analyst ratings.</a>
<h2>Get to Know East West Bancorp Better</h2>
East West Bancorp Inc is the holding company for East West Bank, a full-service commercial bank with cross-border operations concentrated in the United States and China. East-West Bank is one of a few U.S. based banks with a full banking license in China. The bank's cost strategy has increasingly focused on expanding its deposit base away from time deposits to commercial deposits. The bank has also taken part in entertainment partnerships between participants in China and Hollywood. Most of these efforts include financing the production and distribution of film and television projects. The bank leverages its cultural and regulatory knowledge in the U.S. and China to assist its customers in entering new markets. Most of its earning assets are in loans held for investment.
<h3>East West Bancorp: Financial Performance Dissected</h3>
Market Capitalization: Surpassing industry standards, the company's market capitalization asserts its dominance in terms of size, suggesting a robust market position.
Revenue Challenges: East West Bancorp's revenue growth over 3 months faced difficulties. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a decline of approximately -2.82%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Financials sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is a standout performer, exceeding industry averages. With an impressive net margin of 37.14%, the company showcases strong profitability and effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): East West Bancorp's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROE, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROE of 3.53%, the company showcases efficient use of equity capital and strong financial health.
Return on Assets (ROA): East West Bancorp's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 0.35%, the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance.
Debt Management: With a high debt-to-equity ratio of 0.68, East West Bancorp faces challenges in effectively managing its debt levels, indicating potential financial strain.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Benzinga tracks 150 analyst firms and reports on their stock expectations. Analysts typically arrive at their conclusions by predicting how much money a company will make in the future, usually the upcoming five years, and how risky or predictable that company's revenue streams are.
Analysts attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish their ratings on stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter or whenever the company has a major update.
Analysts may enhance their evaluations by incorporating forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue, delivering additional guidance to investors. It is vital to acknowledge that, although experts in stocks and sectors, analysts are human and express their opinions when providing insights.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

EWBC

Expert Outlook: East West Bancorp Through The Eyes Of 7 Analysts

Renovaro Inc. (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RENB#NASDAQ">RENB</a>), a trailblazer in AI-driven early cancer diagnostics and therapeutics, and Cyclomics, a leader in ultra-sensitive 4th generation multi-omics molecular biology, proudly announce a significant milestone in their collaboration. RenovaroCube has entered into an amendment to its binding letter of intent to acquire 100% ownership of Cyclomics, further cementing their shared commitment to advancing state-of-the-art technologies in cancer diagnostics and treatment. Their combined relationships with Oxford Nanopore and Nvidia will further position RenovaroCube to be a leader in early cancer diagnostics and monitoring of treatment efficacy. Oxford Nanopore is a leader in sequencing technologies and Nvidia will provide vital super computing power and front edge software solutions such as Parabricks, BioNeMo, Monai and Nemo. &nbsp;
Initially set at a 75% acquisition, this decision to acquire the remaining 25% of Cyclomics reflects the resounding success of their partnership and the remarkable synergy between the two companies. Upon closing, we believe the acquisition of Cyclomics into the Renovaro family will further strengthen our ability to create a powerhouse for cancer diagnostics throughout the entire patient journey, from early detection/recurrence and personalized treatment in late-stage disease. "We believe that this combination can transform the landscape of patient care both for early detection as well as for monitoring continuously the therapeutics given," according to Dr. Coenraad K. van Kalken (MD/PHD), Chief Commercial Officer of RenovaroCube.&nbsp;
RenovaroCube's open architecture Artificial Intelligence platform, known as the Cube, currently houses over 3600 high-performance biomarker panels for 13 different cancers. This molecular differential AI platform utilizes multi-omic analysis combined with proprietary algorithms and when coupled with Cyclomics' groundbreaking 4th generation molecular technology, shall be able to decode multi-omic data from just a single vial of blood. "We will work with Cyclomics from ‘strength to strength' providing combined technologies, expertise, and resources which will make us unique and offers what we believe will be an unprecedented accuracy in non-invasive early cancer detection," added Dr. Henk Viëtor (MD/PHD).
Cyclomics has pioneered a groundbreaking diagnostic method named ‘CyclomicsSeq' for monitoring early cancer recurrence, utilizing Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology they have created an assay&nbsp;in partnership with Oxford Nanopore&nbsp;that provides detection of even a single ctDNA molecule in blood with nearly 100% accuracy. Additionally, Cyclomics' OmniOmics 4th generation technology enables reliable, fast, and ultra-sensitive early detection of cancer or recurrence thereof using next-generation whole genome sequencing.
"We are excited to join forces with Renovaro to drive the next wave of innovation in molecular biology integrated into an advanced proprietary AI/ML platform," commented Alessio Marcozzi, CSO of Cyclomics. "This combination reflects our shared commitment to pushing the boundaries of what is possible in our respective fields."

RENB

RenovaroCube To Acquire 100% Ownership Of Cyclomics, Reinforcing Cutting-Edge Cancer Diagnostics Partnership; Financial Terms Not Disclosed

In the last three months, 8 analysts have published ratings on Hibbett (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/HIBB#NASDAQ">HIBB</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a concise overview of recent ratings by analysts, offering insights into the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and drawing comparisons with the preceding months for a holistic perspective.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Hibbett, presenting an average target of $80.5, a high estimate of $88.00, and a low estimate of $70.00. Marking an increase of 10.27%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $73.00. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713963654_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Hibbett. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Anna Glaessgen</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$87.50</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Feldman</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$87.50</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Anna Glaessgen</td>
<td>B. Riley Securities</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sam Poser</td>
<td>Williams Trading</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Feldman</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$74.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Feldman</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Joseph Feldman</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Outperform</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
<td>$73.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mitch Kummetz</td>
<td>Seaport Global</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$88.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Responding to changing market dynamics and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their response to recent developments related to Hibbett. This offers insight into analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Offering insights into predictions, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey expectations for the relative performance of Hibbett compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts set price targets as an estimate of a stock's future value. Comparing the current and prior price targets provides insight into how analysts' expectations have changed over time. This information can be valuable for investors seeking to understand consensus views on the stock's potential future performance.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Hibbett's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/HIBB/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Hibbett analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Get to Know Hibbett Better</h2>
Hibbett Inc is engaged in the retail of sports goods. The company operates small to midsize stores and focuses its business on the South, Southwest, mid-Atlantic, and Midwest areas of the country. It offers a broad range of sporting goods, including apparel, footwear, accessories, and equipment needed for team sports, with brands such as Nike, Under Armour, Adidas, The North Face, Jordan, Costa, and others. The company consists of three kinds of stores: Hibbett Sports, the company's primary retail format stores, accounting for most of the company's total stores, and City Gear, and Sports Additions, smaller-format stores primarily offering athletic footwear with a fashion-based style.
<h3>Financial Milestones: Hibbett's Journey</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Positioned below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization faces constraints in size. This could be influenced by factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Hibbett's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 1.81% as of 31 January, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Hibbett's net margin is impressive, surpassing industry averages. With a net margin of 6.62%, the company demonstrates strong profitability and effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Hibbett's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 7.64%. This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital.
Return on Assets (ROA): Hibbett's financial strength is reflected in its exceptional ROA, which exceeds industry averages. With a remarkable ROA of 3.32%, the company showcases efficient use of assets and strong financial health.
Debt Management: Hibbett's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.87.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: What Are They?</h2>
Ratings come from analysts, or specialists within banking and financial systems that report for specific stocks or defined sectors (typically once per quarter for each stock). Analysts usually derive their information from company conference calls and meetings, financial statements, and conversations with important insiders to reach their decisions.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

HIBB

Key Takeaways From Hibbett Analyst Ratings

Truist Securities analyst Mark Hughes maintains Globe Life (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/GL#NYSE">GL</a>) with a Hold and lowers the price target from $125 to $80.

Truist Securities Maintains Hold on Globe Life, Lowers Price Target to $80

Oxford Industries (NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/OXM#NYSE">OXM</a>) underwent analysis by 6 analysts in the last quarter, revealing a spectrum of viewpoints from bullish to bearish.
The table below summarizes their recent ratings, showcasing the evolving sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">5</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $104.33, a high estimate of $110.00, and a low estimate of $94.00. Marking an increase of 0.12%, the current average surpasses the previous average price target of $104.20. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713963643_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Understanding Analyst Ratings: A Comprehensive Breakdown</h2>
An in-depth analysis of recent analyst actions unveils how financial experts perceive Oxford Industries. The following summary outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Paul Lejuez</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Sell</td>
<td>$94.00</td>
<td>$98.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mauricio Serna</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$104.00</td>
<td>$106.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$110.00</td>
<td>$102.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Dana Telsey</td>
<td>Telsey Advisory Group</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Market Perform</td>
<td>$102.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mauricio Serna</td>
<td>UBS</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$106.00</td>
<td>$105.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts respond to changes in market conditions and company performance, frequently updating their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their reaction to recent developments related to Oxford Industries. This information offers a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Providing a comprehensive analysis, analysts offer qualitative assessments, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings reflect expectations for the relative performance of Oxford Industries compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Gaining insights, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Oxford Industries's stock. This comparison reveals trends in analysts' expectations over time.</li>
</ul>
Assessing these analyst evaluations alongside crucial financial indicators can provide a comprehensive overview of Oxford Industries's market position. Stay informed and make well-judged decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/OXM/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Oxford Industries analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Get to Know Oxford Industries Better</h2>
Oxford Industries Inc is an apparel manufacturing company that designs, sources, markets, and distributes products under the brand name Tommy Bahama, and Lilly Pulitzer. Tommy Bahama designs, sources, markets, and distributes men's and women's sportswear and related products. Lilly Pulitzer designs, sources, markets, and distributes upscale collections of women's and women's dresses, sportswear, and related products. The company generates a majority of its revenue from the Tommy Bahama division.
<h3>Oxford Industries's Economic Impact: An Analysis</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Revenue Growth: Oxford Industries's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 31 January, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 5.74%. This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to competitors, the company surpassed expectations with a growth rate higher than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: The company's net margin is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of -14.85%, the company may need to address challenges in effective cost control.
Return on Equity (ROE): Oxford Industries's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -10.11%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -5.32%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: With a below-average debt-to-equity ratio of 0.6, Oxford Industries adopts a prudent financial strategy, indicating a balanced approach to debt management.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Some analysts will also offer forecasts for metrics like growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide further guidance on stocks. Investors who use analyst ratings should note that this specialized advice comes from humans and may be subject to error.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

Decoding 6 Analyst Evaluations For Oxford Industries

In the last three months, 7 analysts have published ratings on Kura Sushi USA (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/KRUS#NASDAQ">KRUS</a>), offering a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish.
The table below provides a snapshot of their recent ratings, showcasing how sentiments have evolved over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">4</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
Insights from analysts' 12-month price targets are revealed, presenting an average target of $115.14, a high estimate of $130.00, and a low estimate of $93.00. This upward trend is apparent, with the current average reflecting a 27.65% increase from the previous average price target of $90.20.
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713963628_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Breaking Down Analyst Ratings: A Detailed Examination</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Kura Sushi USA by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Brian Mullan</td>
<td>Piper Sandler</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$114.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>George Kelly</td>
<td>Roth MKM</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$120.00</td>
<td>$87.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeremy Hamblin</td>
<td>Craig-Hallum</td>
<td>Maintains</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeffrey Bernstein</td>
<td>Barclays</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Equal-Weight</td>
<td>$95.00</td>
<td>$82.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jon Tower</td>
<td>Citigroup</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$124.00</td>
<td>$122.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Mark Smith</td>
<td>Lake Street</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$93.00</td>
<td>$70.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jeremy Hamblin</td>
<td>Craig-Hallum</td>
<td>Raises</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$130.00</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: Analysts adapt their recommendations to changing market conditions and company performance. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise' or 'Lower' their stance, it reflects their response to recent developments related to Kura Sushi USA. This information provides a snapshot of how analysts perceive the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Analysts unravel qualitative evaluations for stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings offer insights into expectations for the relative performance of Kura Sushi USA compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Analysts predict movements in price targets, offering estimates for Kura Sushi USA's future value. Examining the current and prior targets offers insights into analysts' evolving expectations.</li>
</ul>
Understanding these analyst evaluations alongside key financial indicators can offer valuable insights into Kura Sushi USA's market standing. Stay informed and make well-considered decisions with our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/KRUS/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Kura Sushi USA analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>Get to Know Kura Sushi USA Better</h2>
Kura Sushi USA Inc is a Japanese restaurant company. It operates revolving sushi chain restaurants in the United States. It provides access to the revolving and express conveyor belts, on-demand ordering screen, plate slot, and the Bikkura-Pon rewards machine. The company offers several dishes, including Dashi Olive Salmon, Tomago, Sweet Shrimp, Tuna, Garlic Tuna Steak, Salmon, among others. Geographically, it derives revenue from the United States of America.
<h3>Kura Sushi USA's Financial Performance</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: Below industry benchmarks, the company's market capitalization reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. This could be attributed to factors such as growth expectations or operational capacity.
Positive Revenue Trend: Examining Kura Sushi USA's financials over 3 months reveals a positive narrative. The company achieved a noteworthy revenue growth rate of 30.37% as of 29 February, 2024, showcasing a substantial increase in top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the company achieved a growth rate higher than the average among peers in Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Kura Sushi USA's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of -1.74%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Kura Sushi USA's ROE is below industry averages, indicating potential challenges in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of -0.61%, the company may face hurdles in achieving optimal financial returns.
Return on Assets (ROA): Kura Sushi USA's ROA falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of -0.32%, the company may face hurdles in generating optimal returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Kura Sushi USA's debt-to-equity ratio is below the industry average at 0.78, reflecting a lower dependency on debt financing and a more conservative financial approach.
<h2>Analyst Ratings: Simplified</h2>
Analysts work in banking and financial systems and typically specialize in reporting for stocks or defined sectors. Analysts may attend company conference calls and meetings, research company financial statements, and communicate with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically rate each stock once per quarter.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

KRUS

Expert Ratings For Kura Sushi USA

During the last three months, 4 analysts shared their evaluations of Fox Factory Hldg (NASDAQ:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/FOXF#NASDAQ">FOXF</a>), revealing diverse outlooks from bullish to bearish.
The following table summarizes their recent ratings, shedding light on the changing sentiments within the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th></th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bullish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Indifferent</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Somewhat Bearish</th>
<th style="text-align: right;">Bearish</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Total Ratings</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">3</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Last 30D</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>1M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>2M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>3M Ago</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">1</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">2</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
<td style="text-align: right;">0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
In the assessment of 12-month price targets, analysts unveil insights for Fox Factory Hldg, presenting an average target of $54.0, a high estimate of $60.00, and a low estimate of $45.00. A negative shift in sentiment is evident as analysts have decreased the average price target by 24.65%. 
<img src="https://www.benzinga.com/files/images/story/2024/1713963617_0.png" alt="price target chart" />
<h2>Exploring Analyst Ratings: An In-Depth Overview</h2>
The analysis of recent analyst actions sheds light on the perception of Fox Factory Hldg by financial experts. The following summary presents key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets.
<table>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Analyst</th>
<th>Analyst Firm</th>
<th>Action Taken</th>
<th>Rating</th>
<th>Current Price Target</th>
<th>Prior Price Target</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Jim Duffy</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$45.00</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Alexander Perry</td>
<td>B of A Securities</td>
<td>Announces</td>
<td>Neutral</td>
<td>$55.00</td>
<td>-</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Jim Duffy</td>
<td>Stifel</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Hold</td>
<td>$56.00</td>
<td>$69.00</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Michael Swartz</td>
<td>Truist Securities</td>
<td>Lowers</td>
<td>Buy</td>
<td>$60.00</td>
<td>$90.00</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h3>Key Insights:</h3>
<ul>
<li>Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Fox Factory Hldg. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company.</li>
<li>Rating: Delving into assessments, analysts assign qualitative values, from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings communicate expectations for the relative performance of Fox Factory Hldg compared to the broader market.</li>
<li>Price Targets: Understanding forecasts, analysts offer estimates for Fox Factory Hldg's future value. Examining the current and prior targets provides insight into analysts' changing expectations.</li>
</ul>
Analyzing these analyst evaluations alongside relevant financial metrics can provide a comprehensive view of Fox Factory Hldg's market position. Stay informed and make data-driven decisions with the assistance of our Ratings Table.
<a href="https://www.benzinga.com/quote/FOXF/analyst-ratings?utm_source=Benzinga Insights">Stay up to date on Fox Factory Hldg analyst ratings.</a>
If you are interested in following small-cap stock news and performance <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/small-cap">you can start by tracking it here</a>.
<h2>All You Need to Know About Fox Factory Hldg</h2>
Fox Factory Holding Corp is a designer, manufacturer, and marketer of performance-defining products and systems used predominantly on bikes, Side-by-Sides, on-road vehicles with and without off-road capabilities, off-road vehicles and trucks, ATVs, snowmobiles, specialty vehicles and applications, motorcycles, and commercial trucks. Its business operates under the FOX, FOX RACING SHOX, and RACE FACE brands. Geographically, it derives a majority of revenue from North America and also has a presence in Asia, Europe, and the Rest of the World.
<h3>Key Indicators: Fox Factory Hldg's Financial Health</h3>
Market Capitalization Analysis: The company's market capitalization is below the industry average, suggesting that it is relatively smaller compared to peers. This could be due to various factors, including perceived growth potential or operational scale.
Revenue Challenges: Fox Factory Hldg's revenue growth over 3 months faced difficulties. As of 31 December, 2023, the company experienced a decline of approximately -18.63%. This indicates a decrease in top-line earnings. In comparison to its industry peers, the company trails behind with a growth rate lower than the average among peers in the Consumer Discretionary sector.
Net Margin: Fox Factory Hldg's net margin lags behind industry averages, suggesting challenges in maintaining strong profitability. With a net margin of 1.22%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management.
Return on Equity (ROE): Fox Factory Hldg's ROE is below industry standards, pointing towards difficulties in efficiently utilizing equity capital. With an ROE of 0.33%, the company may encounter challenges in delivering satisfactory returns for shareholders.
Return on Assets (ROA): The company's ROA is below industry benchmarks, signaling potential difficulties in efficiently utilizing assets. With an ROA of 0.21%, the company may need to address challenges in generating satisfactory returns from its assets.
Debt Management: Fox Factory Hldg's debt-to-equity ratio is below industry norms, indicating a sound financial structure with a ratio of 0.62.
<h2>How Are Analyst Ratings Determined?</h2>
Analyst ratings serve as essential indicators of stock performance, provided by experts in banking and financial systems. These specialists diligently analyze company financial statements, participate in conference calls, and engage with insiders to generate quarterly ratings for individual stocks.
Some analysts publish their predictions for metrics such as growth estimates, earnings, and revenue to provide additional guidance with their ratings. When using analyst ratings, it is important to keep in mind that stock and sector analysts are also human and are only offering their opinions to investors.
If you want to keep track of which analysts are outperforming others, you can view updated analyst ratings along withanalyst success scores in <a href="https://benzinga.grsm.io/register174">Benzinga Pro</a>.
This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor.

FOXF

Deep Dive Into Fox Factory Hldg Stock: Analyst Perspectives (4 Ratings)

AT&amp;T Inc.&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/T#NYSE">T</a>)&nbsp;reported fiscal first-quarter 2024 operating revenues of $30.03 billion, down 0.4% year over year and missing the&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/pressreleases/24/04/n38399026/at-t-delivers-strong-first-quarter-cash-from-operations-and-free-cash-flow-powered-by-5g-and-fiber" rel="noreferrer noopener">consensus of $30.54 billion</a>.&nbsp;
Adjusted EPS of $0.55 beat the&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/earnings" rel="noreferrer noopener">consensus of $0.54</a>. The stock price gained after the print.
The results reflected&nbsp;declines in Mobility equipment revenues, driven mainly by lower sales volumes and lower Business Wireline revenues.
Also Read:&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/24/04/38356319/verizons-q1-flat-revenue-bump-in-free-cash-flow-and-stable-2024-outlook" rel="noreferrer noopener">Verizon&#8217;s Q1: Flat Revenue, Bump In Free Cash Flow And Stable 2024 Outlook</a>
In the Mobility segment, AT&amp;T clocked 741 thousand million wireless net adds, including 349 thousand postpaid phone net adds.&nbsp;
AT&amp;T&#8217;s Mobility segment saw a Postpaid churn of 0.89%, versus 0.99% year-ago.&nbsp;The Consumer Wireline segment had 252 thousand AT&amp;T Fiber net&nbsp;adds.
AT&amp;T&#8217;s adjusted EBITDA of $11.0 billion was up from $10.6 billion a year ago.&nbsp;It spent $3.8 billion on Capex.
The company generated $7.54 billion in operating cash flow (Up from $6.68 billion in the year-ago quarter), and $3.1 billion in free cash flow (up from $1 billion last year).&nbsp;
Currently, AT&amp;T&#8217;s dividend yield stands at 6.73%. Higher free cash flows allow the company to raise&nbsp;shareholder returns&nbsp;through higher stock buybacks and dividends.&nbsp;
Prepaid churn&nbsp;was 2.77% compared to 2.73% in the year-ago quarter. Postpaid phone-only ARPU&nbsp;was $55.57, up 0.9% compared to the year-ago quarter.
Operating Income:&nbsp;Operating income was $5.8 billion versus $6.0 billion a year ago.&nbsp;
Mobility segment operating income was up 3.1%&nbsp;Y/Y&nbsp;to $6.47 billion with a margin of 31.4% compared to 30.5% in the year-ago quarter.&nbsp;
The Business Wireline segment operating margin was 1.3% compared to 7.1% in the year-ago quarter. The Consumer Wireline segment operating margin was 6.4% compared to 2.9% in the year-ago quarter.
Under CEO&nbsp;John Stankey, AT&amp;T divested media&nbsp;properties and focused on its longtime core business of providing communications services, Bloomberg&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-04-24/at-t-beats-profit-estimates-on-jump-in-wireless-subscribers?sref=TBDibEcD" rel="noreferrer noopener">reports</a>.
AT&amp;T has also recuperated from two incidents since its first quarter earnings, including an&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/24/02/37309931/at-t-offers-5-credit-for-nationwide-outage-commits-to-2024-objectives-amid-fcc-investigation" rel="noreferrer noopener">outage&nbsp;of its wireless network</a>&nbsp;in February and&nbsp;a security breach,&nbsp;disclosed on March 30, in which data from about 73 million current and former customers&nbsp;was compromised.
FY24 Outlook:&nbsp;AT&amp;T reiterated&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/news/earnings/24/01/36758764/why-is-telecom-giant-at-t-stock-down-today" rel="noreferrer noopener">Wireless service revenue growth</a>&nbsp;in the 3% range, Broadband revenue growth of 7%+, and adjusted EPS of $2.15 – $2.25 versus&nbsp;the&nbsp;<a target="_blank" href="https://www.benzinga.com/calendars/guidance" rel="noreferrer noopener">$2.21 consensus</a>.
It maintained full-year adjusted EBITDA growth in the 3% range and a full-year free cash flow of $17 billion-$18 billion.
For 2025, the company affirmed the adjusted EPS growth guidance.
AT&amp;T stock lost 6% in the last 12 months. Investors can gain exposure to the stock via&nbsp;Invesco S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight Communication Services ETF&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/RSPC#NYSE">RSPC</a>) and&nbsp;The Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund&nbsp;(NYSE:<a class="ticker" href="https://www.benzinga.com/stock/XLC#NYSE">XLC</a>).
Price Action:&nbsp;T shares traded higher by 4.06% at $17.18 in the premarket&nbsp;at&nbsp;the last check Wednesday.
Also Read: <a href="https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/24/04/38186223/at-t-comcast-verizon-challenge-subsidy-slash-threatens-internet-for-23m-households" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">AT&amp;T, Comcast, Verizon Challenge: Subsidy Slash Threatens Internet for 23M Households</a>
Photo courtesy: Pixabay