Market Overview Article Provides Evidence As False Arrest Victim Sues For Damage To Reputation


Following Julian Morris' wrongful arrest for DUI in 2008, he filed a personal injury lawsuit over damage caused to his reputation. Legal news website,, covered the case and reported on the DUI charges which were thrown out. Subsequently, the report was used as evidence during Morris' lawsuit concerning the damage to his reputation Morris now states he is thankful to for being instrumental in saving his reputation.

Litchfield, CT (PRWEB) October 31, 2012

Julian Morris says that a article regarding his DUI case in 2008 was used as evidence that he had been harmed. His attorney demonstrated that Morris' reputation was damaged because the article was viewed nationwide. “The defense argued that my reputation wasn't damaged because nobody—except locally--knew about my case, but your article proved them wrong,” says Julian. is a legal news website with a readership extending not only across the U.S., but across the globe. The legal news website also provides state-by-state legal news which attracts readers who are seeking local legal news and information. Some of the website's most highly visited state legal news pages are California, New York and Florida.

At the time in which the article about Julian Morris' false arrest case was published (July 2008), it was not known if Julian would file a personal injury lawsuit to sue for the damage caused to his reputation. “Your article inspired me to seek legal counsel and I did bring legal action against Connecticut State Police Officer Jeffery Poach and Connecticut DEP Sgt. James Warren (Morris v. Warren, et al., Case No. 3:10-cv-01167-SRU, United States District Court for the District of Connecticut),” says Julian.

The false arrest case was allowed to proceed through summary judgment against Sgt. James Warren for malicious prosecution and a compromise was strongly suggested by the presiding Federal Judge. A resolution was reached through the Federal Magistrate whereby the State of Connecticut agrees to pay the Plaintiff a monetary sum.

Julian's DUI (Driving Under the Influence) was tossed out of court by Superior Court Judge Paul Matasavage, who indicated that Morris should never have been charged with a crime in the first place. Morris had passed the breathalyzer test after a paddlewheel boat he was operating capsized—they were caught in a storm. Still, Morris--a former police officer--had been arrested for boating under the influence.

Julian says he was charged with DUI because of one police officer seemed to have a personal vendetta against him. “They said my eyes were bloodshot but I am allergic to the lake water,” he says. They said ‘subject was evasive' but I was careful answering my questions—having been a cop. They convoluted and twisted everything.”

The Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) was also at the scene. Because the accident happened on a state lake, the state police turned the case over to the DEP. And because Julian passed the breathalyzer test at the state police barracks, the police knew they didn't have a DUI case. But the DEP charged Julian with the felony version of boating over the influence, a higher charge, and without chemical evidence.

“Hence my attorney went after malicious prosecution,” says Julian. “Still, the DEP continued to state that the police officers did a fine job of investigation. It showed up in the local newspaper for weeks until we went to trial, which lasted 10 minutes due to lack of evidence.”

The prosecution dropped the charges but it was a traumatic experience for Julian, regardless. And time consuming. For his personal injury lawsuit, Julian had to provide 10 years of tax forms; and he had to answer hundreds of personal questions sent by the defense.

“In my opinion, the judges were sympathetic to my case because they allowed it to progress to summary judgment. They suggested that the defendant settle, then we went to a settlement hearing.

“To this day the DEP contend that they did nothing wrong and I have yet to receive my settlement. But I am thankful to for being instrumental in saving my reputation.” provides comprehensive legal news and critical information for those affected by once-in-a-lifetime situations involving medical device lawsuits, personal injury, defective products, California Overtime and labor issues or a host of others. Readers seeking legal help can request it by completing a form which is distributed to attorneys specializing in these cases. Trial attorneys utilize the site to keep abreast of hot legal issues and settlements as well as connect with potential clients. Web:
About Online Legal Media
Online Legal Media owns and operates websites providing information for the general public and the legal community., founded in 2001, is an online legal news publication with over 2.7 million visitors annually and hundreds of thousands of requests for attorney help from its readership. serves as a portal for trial attorneys to network and to market their firms to other attorneys and legal professionals. offers up-to-date resources and news for those suffering from asbestos exposure and mesothelioma. Online Legal Media is based in Santa Cruz, California.
Follow Online Legal Media on Twitter @OnlineLegalNews and on Facebook at
All trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

For the original version on PRWeb visit:

View Comments and Join the Discussion!