Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP Files Class Action Suit against Kansas City Southern

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--

Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP (“Robbins Geller”) (http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/kansascitysouthern/) today announced that a class action has been commenced in the United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri on behalf of purchasers of Kansas City Southern (“KCS”) KSU common stock during the period between October 18, 2013 and February 18, 2014 (the “Class Period”).

If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than 60 days from today. If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this notice or your rights or interests, please contact plaintiff's counsel, Samuel H. Rudman or David A. Rosenfeld of Robbins Geller at 800/449-4900 or 619/231-1058, or via e-mail at djr@rgrdlaw.com. If you are a member of this class, you can view a copy of the complaint as filed or join this class action online at http://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases/kansascitysouthern/. Any member of the putative class may move the Court to serve as lead plaintiff through counsel of their choice, or may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.

The complaint charges KCS and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. KCS operates railroads in the Midwest and Mexico that run north to south, unlike most other U.S. railroads that run east to west.

The complaint alleges that during the Class Period, KCS issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company's financial performance and future prospects and failed to disclose the following adverse facts: (i) that KCS's utility coal volumes and crude oil shipments were declining below forecasted levels during its 2013 fourth quarter; (ii) that the construction of the Company's new Port Arthur crude oil terminal was experiencing operational difficulties which was delaying its completion and the Company's realization of the benefits from the plant; (iii) that carloads in the Company's Chemical & Petroleum shipments to Mexico had declined during the fourth quarter of 2013 due to operational issues with the Company's customers in Mexico; (iv) that KCS's anticipated ramp-up of its Mexican auto shipment business was not advancing to the degree KCS led the market to believe, as the new plants were not coming on-line and there would be a negligible benefit to KCS's revenues and profits in 2014; and (v) that Mexican government officials were privately clamoring to take back or control the monopoly pricing power KCS had by way of an agreement giving KCS and another company exclusive use of tracks in Mexico. As a result of defendants' false and misleading statements and omissions, KCS common stock traded at artificially inflated prices during the Class Period, reaching a high of $125.96 per share on November 14, 2013.

On January 24, 2014, KCS issued a press release announcing its fourth quarter and fiscal 2013 financial results. The Company's reported fourth quarter and fiscal 2013 net income significantly missed the net income the investment community had been led to expect based on defendants' Class Period statements. The Company also offered a disappointing earnings growth outlook for fiscal 2014, forecasting per-share earnings for 2014 to rise only in the mid-teens, while the investment community had been led to expect 26% growth based on defendants' Class Period statements. On this news, the price of KCS common stock declined more than $17.79 per share to close below $100 per share on January 24, 2014. Then, on February 18, 2014, the market learned that the lower house of the Mexican legislature had approved a new bill to increase rail competition in Mexico by giving third-party companies access to KCS's exclusive freight and passenger rail networks, and to give the government control over tariffs. On this news, the price of KCS stock fell another $4.00 per share.

Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of all purchasers of KCS common stock during the Class Period (the “Class”). The plaintiff is represented by Robbins Geller, which has expertise in prosecuting investor class actions and extensive experience in actions involving financial fraud.

Robbins Geller represents U.S. and international institutional investors in contingency-based securities and corporate litigation. With nearly 200 lawyers in ten offices, the firm represents hundreds of public and multi-employer pension funds with combined assets under management in excess of $2 trillion. The firm has obtained many of the largest recoveries and has been ranked number one in the number of shareholder class action recoveries in MSCI's Top SCAS 50 every year since 2003. Please visit http://www.rgrdlaw.com for more information.