Google's Loss On Motorola Isn't As Bad As It Seems...Here's Why
Despite what appears to be a $9.5 billion loss, Michael J. De La Merced of New York Time's DealBook wrote that Google “did not do so bad.”
How is this possible? Using some simple accounting techniques, Google “technically” paid much less than $12.5 billion for Motorola.
When Motorola was initially acquired it had $3 billion in cash on hand in addition to $1 billion in tax credits, technically lowering the original deal to $8.5 billion.
Google later on sold Motorola's set-top box business to Arris for around $2.4 billion. As this was cash related to the initial Motorola acquisition, this lowers the effective acquisition price to around $6.1 billion.
Effectively, Google paid $6.1 billion for Motorola and has sold the division for $2.9 billion, translating to a $3.2 billion loss, which doesn't sound as bad the originally $9.5 billion loss that many investors fixated on.
But wait, there's more.
In a regulatory filing in 2012, Google valued its Motorola's overall “patents and developed technology” at about $5.5 billion. Under the terms of the deal announced on Wednesday, Google will retain ownership of the majority of the patents.
Once all this is said and done, did Google really commit what Time described as a “gargantuan mistake only Google could afford to make?”
© 2016 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.