Best & Worst ETFs and Mutual Funds: Mid-cap Value Style
The mid-cap value style ranks tenth out of the twelve fund styles as detailed in my style rankings for ETFs and mutual funds. It gets my Dangerous rating, which is based on aggregation of ratings of 12 ETFs and 176 mutual funds in the mid-cap value style as of October 22, 2012. Prior reports on the best & worst ETFs and mutual funds in every sector and style are here.
Figures 1 and 2 show the five best and worst-rated ETFs and mutual funds in the style. Not all mid-cap value style ETFs and mutual funds are created the same. The number of holdings varies widely (from 25 to 662), which creates drastically different investment implications and ratings. The best ETFs and mutual funds allocate more value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks than the worst, which allocate too much value to Neutral-or-worse-rated stocks.
To identify the best and avoid the worst ETFs and mutual funds within the mid-cap value style, investors need a predictive rating based on (1) stocks ratings of the holdings and (2) the all-in expenses of each ETF and mutual fund. Investors need not rely on backward-looking ratings. My fund rating methodology is detailed here.
Investors should not buy any ETFs or mutual funds because none get an Attractive-or-better rating. If you must have exposure to this style, you should buy a basket of Attractive-or-better rated stocks and avoid paying undeserved fund fees. Active management has a long history of not paying off.
Get my ratings on all ETFs and mutual funds in this style on my free mutual fund and ETF screener.
Figure 1: ETFs with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
* Best ETFs exclude ETFs with NAV’s less than 100 million.
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
First Trust Mid Cap Value AlphaDEX Fund (NYSE: FNK) and Rydex S&P Midcap 400 Pure Value (RFV) are excluded from Figure 1 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity standards.
Figure 2: Mutual Funds with the Best & Worst Ratings – Top 5
* Best mutual funds exclude funds with NAV’s less than 100 million.
Sources: New Constructs, LLC and company filings
Six mutual funds are excluded from Figure 2 because their total net assets (TNA) are below $100 million and do not meet our liquidity standards.
WisdomTree MidCap Earnings Fund (NYSE: EZM) is my top-rated mid-cap value ETF and Artisan Partners Fund, Inc.: Artisan Mid Cap Value Fund (NYSE: APHQX) is my top-rated mid-cap value mutual fund. Both earn my Neutral rating.
SPDR S&P400 Mid Cap Value ETF (NYSE: MDYV) is my worst-rated mid-cap value ETF and Transamerica Funds: Transamerica Small/Mid Cap Value (NYSE: IIVAX) is my worst-rated mid-cap value mutual fund. Both earn a Dangerous-or-below rating.
Figure 3 shows that 386 out of the 1,513 stocks (over 29% of the total net assets) held by mid-cap value ETFs and mutual funds get an Attractive-or-better rating. However, none of the 12 mid-cap value ETFs or 176 mid-cap value mutual funds get an Attractive-or-better rating.
The takeaways are: mutual fund managers allocate too much capital to low-quality stocks and mid-cap value ETFs hold poor quality stocks.
Figure 3: Mid-cap Value Style Landscape For ETFs, Mutual Funds & Stocks
Investors need to tread carefully when considering mid-cap value ETFs and mutual funds, as no ETF or mutual funds in the mid-cap value style allocate enough value to Attractive-or-better-rated stocks to earn an Attractive rating. Investors should focus on individual stocks instead. Here are two very different stocks that are held by mid-cap value mutual funds.
The Progressive Corp (NYSE: PGR) is one of my favorite stocks held my mid-cap value funds. PGR receives my Very Attractive rating. PGR has generated positive economic earnings eleven out of the past fourteen years. In 2011 they produced an economic earnings margin of 10.5%. This ranks in the 89th percentile of all 3000+ companies in our coverage universe. This level of profitability places PGR among the elite, however the market prices its stock amongst the cheapest. PGR currently trades at a price-to-economic book of 1.0; this implies the company will never grow its after-tax operating earnings (NOPAT) beyond current levels. Over the past ten years, PGR has grown its after-tax operating earnings 9% compounded annually. Given the company’s past, the market appears overly pessimistic about its future. The market’s low stock price coupled with PGR’s high profitability make it a Very Attractive stock.
Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. (NYSE: ELS) is one of my least favorite stocks held by mid-cap value funds. It receives my Very Dangerous rating. ELS is a value-destroyer. Over the past fourteen years, ELS has never produced positive economic earnings. Many investors have flocked into REITs as they offer high dividend yields in this low interest rate environment. In seeking this income, they have bid up the price of REITs to the point where they have put their principal at risk. To justify ELS’s stock price of $67.58, the company would have to grow its after-tax operating earnings (NOPAT) at 15%, compounded annually, for the next fourteen years. It is not worth purchasing shares of ELS for its 2.60% dividend yield when the downside risk is so large.
Figures 4 and 5 show the rating landscape of all mid-cap value ETFs and mutual funds.
Our style rankings for ETFs and mutual funds report ranks all styles and highlights those that offer the best investments.
Figure 4: Separating the Best ETFs From the Worst Funds
Figure 5: Separating the Best Mutual Funds From the Worst Funds
Review my full list of ratings and rankings along with reports on all 12 ETFs and 176 mutual funds in the mid-cap value style.
Disclosure: I do not own any of the stocks, ETFs or mutual funds in this report. I receive no compensation to write about any specific stock, sector, style or theme.
The following article is from one of our external contributors. It does not represent the opinion of Benzinga and has not been edited.