Market Overview

At First Glance, SolarCity Deal Would Be A Big Negative For Tesla

At First Glance, SolarCity Deal Would Be A Big Negative For Tesla
Related TSLA
Mike Khouw's Put Fly Trade In Tesla
Here's Why You Shouldn't Buy Tesla's Hype
Tesla, Automakers Face 'Serious Concerns' On Autonomy; Model X Reliability Hit (Investor's Business Daily)
Cramer Shares His Opinion On 8Point3 Energy, PPG Industries And Allergan
Watch These 5 Huge Put Purchases In Wednesday Trade
Tesla Readies Q3 Earnings Report During Tumultuous Time (Investor's Business Daily)

Tesla Motors Inc (NASDAQ: TSLA) has offered to acquire SolarCity Corp (NASDAQ: SCTY) in an all-stock deal that represents a 21-30 percent premium to the latter’s closing price on Tuesday. Pacific Crest’s Brad Erickson maintained a Sector Weight rating for Tesla, saying that the deal seemed to be “fraught with financial risk” and the initial take is “largely negative” for the automaker.

Tesla’s offer, which values SolarCity at $26.50-$28.50 per share, is still to be approved by the latter’s board and is subject to normal regulatory approvals. Analyst Brad Erickson pointed out that the transaction would require Tesla to issue about 14 million new shares, or 10 percent.

SolarCity Financials Negative for Tesla

Although both companies operate in the broader alternative energy sector, their business and financing models are very different.

Related Link: Tesla's Bid Suggests "Very Little Value" In SolarCity; Gordon Johnson Maintains Sell

“The concern on SolarCity from our outsider's perspective was investor uncertainty about whether its cost of capital structure would support profitable economics down the road. Coming under Tesla's wing could serve to improve certainty, although we are not sure how,” Erickson wrote.

SolarCity has an atypical model, which is based on the net present value [NPV] of future cash flows from its long-term annuity agreements. This is likely to weigh on Tesla's financials, the analyst stated.

SolarCity's management indicated that the company had sufficient recurring revenue under contract to repay all debt. Erickson mentioned, however, that the consensus estimates imply that SolarCity would burn about $400 million in cash from operations next year, while recording non-GAAP losses of nearly $1 billion.

Latest Ratings for TSLA

Oct 2016Goldman SachsDowngradesBuyNeutral
Sep 2016Cowen & Co.Initiates Coverage onUnderperform
Jun 2016Argus ResearchDowngradesBuyHold

View More Analyst Ratings for TSLA
View the Latest Analyst Ratings

Posted-In: Brad Erickson Pacific CrestAnalyst Color Commodities Reiteration Markets Analyst Ratings Best of Benzinga


Related Articles (TSLA + SCTY)

View Comments and Join the Discussion!